Package: lightdm
Version: 1.10.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hello,
I cannot start lightdm on my system with Intel graphics since yesterday's
upgrade from 1.10.1-3 to 1.10.2-1.
The service fails with:
root@nostromo:~# systemctl start lightdm
Job for lightdm.servic
Dear Aurelien, dear all,
for unrelated reasons I had to reinstall my system and now everything
works fine with the latest libc6.
I suppose there was some sort of horrible conflict somewhere.
Hopefully it won't be reproducible anywhere else.
As far as I'm concerned, case closed.
--
To UNSUBS
Dear Aurelien, dear all,
I was trying once more the upgrade to libc6-2.10.2-2 and I have noticed
that when dpkg configures libc6, it spits out a message like:
dpkg: considering deconfiguration of libc6, which would be broken by
installation of libc-bin ...
dpkg: yes, will deconfigure libc6 (brok
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 19:28 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Are you using libpam-mount?
Hello Aurelien,
thanks for keeping up with this.
I have upgraded my desktop system to 2.10.1-5 and everything works fine,
while the laptop still gives the same problem when upgrading to this
version.
I also tho
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:41 +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> Do you have /var/log/dpkg.log? Even if it does not contain the action
> that failed first, the lines before the failure may show if packages
> were being installed in an unexpected order.
Hi Gabor,
thanks for helping out.
Here it is, I can
Ok, I took a shortcut.
I booted a livecd and I mounted the / partition of the laptop.
Then I downloaded the following files:
libc6_2.9-27_amd64.deb
libc6-dev_2.9-27_amd64.deb
libc6-i386_2.9-27_amd64.deb
and unpacked them in the newly mounted directory:
$ dpkg-deb -X /tmp/where/the/root/is/mounte
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 08:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Do you have the list of packages that have been upgraded?
I wish I did, but as soon as debconf asked "would you like to upgrade
libc6 now?" and I answered "yes", the system became completely unusable.
However, my desktop has not been upg
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 14:42 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Could you try changing the line in
> /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/conftest.h that says:
>
> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,29)
>
> to
>
> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,27)
>
> And then doing module-assis
Hello everyone,
180.44-2 still does not build against 2.6.28, but it does build fine
against 2.6.29, both debian stock kernels and headers.
linux-kbuild are homemade since they seem to be missing from unstable
and they are built according to:
http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKe
9 matches
Mail list logo
