Bug#579583: marked as done (netatalk: db version missmatch?)

2010-04-29 Thread Frank Lahm
2010/4/29 Jonas Smedegaard : > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:07:37PM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote: >>> >>> From: Jonas Smedegaard >>> ... >>> This one is not a bug, however, but a shortcoming of upstream code which >>> cause breakage each time we bump the

Bug#579583: marked as done (netatalk: db version missmatch?)

2010-04-29 Thread Frank Lahm
> From: Jonas Smedegaard > ... > This one is not a bug, however, but a shortcoming of upstream code which > cause breakage each time we bump the BerkeleyDB version. Rescue is near though, from the manual [1]: "Note that the first version to appear after Netatalk 2.1 ie Netatalk 2.1.1, will suppor

Bug#559060: netatalk: FTBFS due to autoreconf issues when autotools are installed

2009-12-01 Thread Frank Lahm
2009/12/1 Cyril Brulebois : > Jonas Smedegaard (01/12/2009): >> My builds using cowdancer+pbuilder on amd64 and i386 with a fully >> up-to-date Sid shows no such things. > > Note I'm talking about porter boxes, so a bit more than just chroot + > Build-Depends. > >> Perhaps some environment variabl

Bug#533141: Current netatalk fails to build from source

2009-06-16 Thread Frank Lahm
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard > >> You've asked those patches before, and I told you not (as upstream) > >> to worry about those pathces to autogenerated files): I agree that > >> they are not of concern for upstream. > > > >But you are *not* patching _generated_ files here. You are patching > >confi

Bug#533141: Current netatalk fails to build from source

2009-06-16 Thread Frank Lahm
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:59:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote: > >2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard > >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote: > >> >2009/6/16 Itai Seggev > >> >> Any other suggestions? >

Bug#533141: Current netatalk fails to build from source

2009-06-16 Thread Frank Lahm
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote: > >2009/6/16 Itai Seggev > >> Any other suggestions? > > > >Although you're only reporting this problem with a rc and the final is > >alread available, whatev

Bug#533141: Current netatalk fails to build from source

2009-06-16 Thread Frank Lahm
2009/6/16 Itai Seggev > Any other suggestions? Although you're only reporting this problem with a rc and the final is alread available, whatever causes your error may still be present. Therefore I'm digging into this and will be talkin to the libtool folks. Stay tuned. -Frank, Netatalk Developer

Bug#533141: Current netatalk fails to build from source

2009-06-15 Thread Frank Lahm
2009/6/15 Itai Seggev : > Package: netatalk > Version: 2.0.4~rc2-1 > Severity: serious > > Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there's something seriously wrong with my > system, > but this has never failed me in the past.  I am try to rebuild the package > from > source to enable openSSL. Please re-r