Thanks Florian, for your prompt responses. And please excuse the ugly e-mail
style without proper line wrappings that Outlook (company...) causes in
Debian's BTS.
I'm still curious why the bug we've stumbled upon in OpenSSL was no issue in
previous versions of bind9 in lenny?
Best regards,
Mir
> BIND uses the NULL argument, as far as I can tell. So this might be
> an OpenSSL bug.
Well, all I can say is that bind9 as provided by the package version
"1:9.5.1.dfsg.P3-1+lenny1" doesn't show the reported behavior, and that both
"1:9.5.1.dfsg.P3-1+lenny1" and the current "1:9.6.ESV.R1+dfsg
Package: bind9
Version: 1:9.6.ESV.R1+dfsg-0+lenny1
Severity: serious
(This also seems to affect newer versions of bind9; also tested with
1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1~bpo50+1 from backports.)
I had to invest quite some time today in figuring out why the recent security
update for bind9 worked fine on all
Thank you very much!
Mirko
This message contains information which may be confidential and
privileged.Unless you
are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive this message for the
intended
recipient), you may not use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the
message or
any informati
Package: sun-java6-jdk
Version: 6-17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Package sun-java6-jdk on sid/amd64 lags behind sid/i386 quite a bit now. That's
a pity, since the current version of Sun Java has quite a list of security
fixes compared to the package in sid/amd64.
I'm tracking sun-java6-j
5 matches
Mail list logo
