Hi there,
I am writing in this bug cause noone seems to be able to help me in the
aforementioned #427514 and #428399.
I have the same issues on a RAID 1 system. I'll copy paste all the info
I gathered by reading the previous messages.
---start
I found this bug and I think that it's
Subject: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.21-5~snapshot.8808
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi there,
since I have installed 2.6.21-4 from
Hi there,
looks like that launching your java application by preloading the
libXinerama shipped by Debian solves the problem:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6532373
It works just fine for Azureus:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/azureus$
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1
Sam Morris wrote:
What is the output of the 'locale' command on your system?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ locale
LANG=C
LANGUAGE=en_CH:en_US:en_GB:en
LC_CTYPE=C
LC_NUMERIC=C
LC_TIME=C
LC_COLLATE=C
LC_MONETARY=C
LC_MESSAGES=C
LC_PAPER=C
LC_NAME=C
LC_ADDRESS=C
LC_TELEPHONE=C
LC_MEASUREMENT=C
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Well, can you provide some logs of the error mode? Can you
start by removing the ./debian directory, building a new kernel
image, and capture the full installation log?
Actually it wasn't happening with a homemade kernel, but upgrading the
normal
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.063
Followup-For: Bug #394661
Hi there,
I just wanted to report that the latest version of kernel-package does not
fix the issue. The workaround proposed by Sven still applies.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
Package: openafs-modules-source
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi there,
I have upgraded my Debian Sid and rebuilt the openafs kernel module against
my kernel 2.6.18 (stock Debian kernel). I have used m-a:
# m-a a-i openafs
it worked alright just like
Package: libaspell15c2
Followup-For: Bug #317873
I'd just like to confirm that the last distupgrade (15/7/2005) tends to fail
because of
this package. It is however enough to exclude gaim/gaim-data and
gedit/gedit-common from upgrade to go straight without problems.
I also tried to pull Gaim
8 matches
Mail list logo