I've asked upstream whether sources for the papers are available.
- Jim Van Zandt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I've asked upstream whether the sources are available.
- Jim Van Zandt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I cannot reproduce your failure. I can install emacspeak-ss with no
problem on my system.
I have not worked with pbuilder before. However, I tried
apt-get install cowbuilder
cowbuilder --create
cowbuilder --login
apt-get install emacspeak-ss
and it installed fine.
I'm inclined to
to the 26.0
package.
- Jim Van Zandt
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:33:28 -0600
From: Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:09:15PM -0500, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
Yes, I realize that my first package of version 28.0 missed
be installed at the same time (emacs20,
emacs21, xemacs21, etc.). In accordance with the Debian emacs policy,
emacspeak is byte-compiled separately for each supported flavor -
@@ -85,3 +88,5 @@
=20
James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mon Jan 30 21:36:59 EST 2006
=20
Andreas -
Thanks, I've reopened the bug.
I note your original report shows a version of 0.4.0-7+b1. I don't
recognize the +b1 - what does that signify?
I also see you're running a 64 bit system, whereas I have a 32 bit
system, and I suspect that's the real problem. Would you mind dumping
a
minpack builds correctly on hppa bumping the automake build dependency
to automake1.9.
Actually automake is not required to build the package, so I removed
it from the list.
- Jim Van Zandt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
For the record, I suggest something like this for recovery:
dpkg-reconfigure debconf
select some frontend other than readline
dpkg --configure -a # recover from failed configurations
apt-get install --reinstall sash# recover from even worse corruption
T. V. Raman -
Another Debian developer noticed that the emacspeak sources have
several contradictory copyright notices, and questions whether it
meets the Debian Free Software Guidlines. We'd appreciate some
clarification on two points:
What copyright actually covers emacspeak?
Is
Dr. Raman -
I think a couple more answers can clarify things enough.
First, the copyright: Do you now have the copyright for emacspeak?
(Various files in the sources assign the copyright to you, to Adobe,
and to DEC. I suppose some of those statements are out of date.)
Second, the license: I
10 matches
Mail list logo
