Bug#475757: should this package be orphaned or removed?

No I do not agree that it should be orphaned. I am currently in the middle of finishing a basement redesign to build out an office so my computers are currently offline. Dust and servers don't mix unless you want to make costly server repairs. On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Thomas Viehmann <[EMA

Bug#401797: contains non-DFSG-free code

Well known issue for ... oh the past year or two IIRC... It's why I haven't done anything with any PEAR packages in almost 2 years now... file away the bug and it will sit until the PHP license changes. On 12/5/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Package: php-image-canvas Version: 0.2.

Bug#400989: License of Image_Color

It was the PHP License itself that was the problem and unless it's been revised to deal with the issues that had already been brought up to the PHP group's attention it will remain one... I'll look but as far as I know it hadn't been dealt with as it was requiring a license revision and then the P

Bug#400989: php-image-canvas: Lacks Image/Color.php required by Color.php

I'll have to re-visit Image_Color then from Pear to see if the PHP group has resolved the licensing issues that was keeping it from being packaged previously. On 11/29/06, Igor Tamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Package: php-image-canvas Version: 0.2.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders pa

Bug#319389: acidlab: ACID looks dead should get replaced by BASE

Very good call then and makes sense... Maybe once I've finished moving and have my computers set back up at my new location cross-country I'll get to dealing with stuff that is currently being neglected. Note I'm sending this from my Gmail account as my systems are offline and unavailable till ever