severity 541679 important
thanks
Hi,
I just noticed that this package was never successfully built for
architectures without a threading runtime, so the FTBFS ought not to be
release critical. Downgrading it (but a fix is expected to happen
nevertheless).
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2009, 23:51 +0300 schrieb Riku Voipio:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:35:04PM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
Please don't remove ghc6 on ia64 from unstable. ghc6 has a
Build-Depends on ghc6 and the current 6.8.2 on ia64 is sufficient for
building 6.12.
would dropping
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 01.09.2009, 15:18 +0200 schrieb Micha Lenk:
in the past you've sponsered uploads for me, so I'm asking you again:
Can you please sponsor the upload to DELAYED/7-day/ the following NMU?
http://micha.lenk.info/debian/unstable/gnucash_2.2.6-3.1.dsc
It fixes Debian bug
Hi John,
I have hit a similar problem with hlint:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541679
I guess you’ll have to make the -parallel parameter depend on a cabal
flag, and that it based on the arch you are compiling on, or dynamically
based on the existence of the threaded runtime.
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 21.08.2009, 14:34 -0500 schrieb John Goerzen:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:49:26PM +, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi John,
I have hit a similar problem with hlint:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541679
I guess you???ll have to make the -parallel
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2009, 01:36 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Freitag, den 21.08.2009, 14:34 -0500 schrieb John Goerzen:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:49:26PM +, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi John,
I have hit a similar problem with hlint:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Hi Marco,
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 00:24 +0200 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
Package: gtk2hs
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
due to the (quite) recent automake 1.11 upload, your package fails to
build, since it doesn't depend explicitly on 1.10 but tries to use
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2009, 14:15 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane:
There appears to be something weird going on with hs-plugins. If you
check out debian/rules then there is a lot of logic for installing the
documentation (I don't understand why this is needed; can't we bring
the package into
Hi Neil,
trying to build hlint does not work on some architectures (at least
alpha, s390, mips) where no threaded RTS is available. An example build
log is available at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=alphapkg=hlintver=1.6.4-1
This is caused by
ghc-options:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2009, 17:47 +0100 schrieb Neil Mitchell:
trying to build hlint does not work on some architectures (at least
alpha, s390, mips) where no threaded RTS is available. An example build
log is available at
Hi,
I thought I give it a shot and tried to build ghc-6.10.4 on ia64. In the
sid dchroot on merulo, I removed haddock from ghc6’s build-dependencies
and ran debuild. Here it fails with:
/usr/bin/make -C utils with-stage-2
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/nomeata/ghc6/ghc6-6.10.4/utils'
Hi,
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 00:25 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I thought I give it a shot and tried to build ghc-6.10.4 on ia64. In the
sid dchroot on merulo, I removed haddock from ghc6’s build-dependencies
and ran debuild. Here it fails with:
/usr/bin/make -C utils with-stage-2
Hi,
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 02:21 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I debugged it some more, adding putStrLn’s in various locations. It
seems it crashes when parsing the packages files, which lead me to the
hypothesis that the problem is related to the happy-generated-files.
These files
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2009, 23:47 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane:
I can not reproduce it on Debian unstable:
How did you build it? I just built with a sid sbuild chroot (on a
Karmic host, admittedly), and:
la...@chicken dpkg --info libghc6-edison-api-dev_1.2.1-10_amd64.deb |
egrep ^
Hi Iain,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2009, 14:01 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane:
I don't quite know what's wrong with this package, hence filing a bug
instead of just fixing it myself...
I've rebuilt it on Karmic and noticed that the dependencies aren't
autogenerated correctly for -dev; namely there
Hi,
FYI, whoever fixes this (might be me). It seems edison has been split
into
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/EdisonCore
and
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/EdisonAPI
I guess EdisonCore should Replace: edison in Debian.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2009, 19:12 +0200 schrieb Arjan Oosting:
Op donderdag 16-07-2009 om 17:22 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Joachim
Breitner:
Hi,
FYI, whoever fixes this (might be me). It seems edison has been split
into
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/EdisonCore
Hi,
I’ll be collecting problems with packages that would hold up a ghc6
transition and send them here, in case someone looks for something to
do:
haskell-edison does not build, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534038
An upgrade to 1.2.1.3 will fix this. Arjan has agreed to
Package: haskell-cgi
Version: 3001.1.7.1-1
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi kaol,
in haskell-cgi, a dependency on libghc6-mtl-dev was forgotten, and now
it does not build on the buildds.
BTW: What is your attitute WRT to NMUs? Do you welcome if other
Package: haskell-tagsoup
Version: 0.6-2
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kaol,
same as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536584:
in haskell-tagsoup, a dependency on libghc6-mtl-dev is missing, and now
it does not build on the buildds.
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2009, 08:41 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
Em Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:47:48 +0200
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org escreveu:
(...)
haskell-uulib_0.9.10-0.1 (nmu by Marco) fails due to:
Configuring uulib-0.9.10...
hlibrary.setup: ffihugs
Hi Kaol,
arrows-0.4.1.1 has a dependency on base that allows for base-4.1.
Upgrading to that should make it installable again.
Feel free to ask for an NMU.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID:
Hi,
haskell-uulib_0.9.10-0.1 (nmu by Marco) fails due to:
Configuring uulib-0.9.10...
hlibrary.setup: ffihugs is required but it could not be found.
Marco, did you see that?
Is there anyone in the DHG that feels especially attached (and thus
responsible :-)) for hugs?
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.06.2009, 07:29 +0200 schrieb A. Baur:
Package: libghc6-x11-xft-dev
Version: 0.3-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Todays update of libghc6-utf8-string-dev to 0.3.5-1 broke
libghc6-x11-xft-dev, making it unusable (ie.
Package: libmyodbc
Version: 3.51.19r646-1
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the package is uninstallable on amd64, as it depends on libltdl3
(= 1.5.2-2). I assume it is enough to just ask for a binNMU to fix
this.
Thanks,
Joachim
- -- System Information:
reopen 530732
notfixed 530732 0.8.1-3+b1
thanks
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 13:18 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 12:53 +0200 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz:
Package: ghc6-doc
Version: 6.10.3-1
Severity: serious
Setting up ghc6-doc (6.10.3-1
Hi Kurt, hi d-haskell,
Am Sonntag, den 24.05.2009, 14:56 +0200 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
reopen 530238
notfixed 530238 1.4.5-3+b1
thanks
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 01:33:15PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Samstag, den 23.05.2009, 11:09 +0200 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
Package: libghc6-x11-doc
tags 529773 + pending
notfound 0.8-1
found 0.8.1-3
thanks
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2009, 15:04 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
Package: libghc6-xmonad-dev
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: grave
libghc6-xmonad-dev can not be upgraded to the latest version since its'
dependencies are not
Hi Enrico,
Am Donnerstag, den 07.05.2009, 14:09 +0200 schrieb Holger Levsen:
1m0.3s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
/etc/default/nodm not owned
as you know the maintainer scripts of nodm best, are you going to fix
this, or do you not have time for it?
If you do make
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2009, 18:44 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
this problem is with haskell-devscripts. I've done already a package
that fixes it. It's available in:
http://debian.holoscopio.com/haskell-devscripts/
Joachim, can you upload it please?
done. (I modified
Hi,
what’s the state of this bug? Will g-p-m be fixed to work in the absence
of consolekit?
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Hi,
FYI, a mere rebuild does not work:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=haskell-http;ver=30010004-3%2Bb1;arch=amd64;stamp=1237212155
Probably a new upstream release that is ghc-6.10 compatible is required.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
Package: haskell-http
Version: 30010004-3
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Arjan,
I’m sure you are aware of this, but I still like it to have it tracked.
haskell-http is currently uninstallable and needs to be re-built against
ghc6-6.10
Thanks,
Joachim
- --
Package: libghc6-utf8-string-doc
Version: 0.3.4-3
Severity: grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Chris,
just to let you know: kaos recently fixed the arch dependency issues
with .haddock files in ghc6-6.10.1+dfsg1-13 and haddock-2.4.1-4. This
means that all packages built on
Am Samstag, den 28.02.2009, 11:21 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Hi Chris,
just to let you know: kaos recently fixed the arch dependency issues
with .haddock files in ghc6-6.10.1+dfsg1-13 and haddock-2.4.1-4. This
means that all packages built on amd64 need to be re-uploaded
Package: libghc6-utf8-string-dev
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Chris,
for updating xmonad-contrib, I’m waiting for an updated package of
haskell-utf8-string for ghc6.10.
Note that you should consider using this chance to switch to the
Hi,
Am Montag, den 23.02.2009, 17:59 + schrieb Chris Lamb:
However, I went to upload haskell-utf8-string yesterday but could not
build the documentation due to (what appears to be) a bug in haddock:
**
BUILDING libghc6-utf8-string-doc FOR
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 20.02.2009, 11:09 +0200 schrieb Kari Pahula:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 05:45:55PM -0800, David Fox wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Joachim Breitner
nome...@debian.org wrote
* We mach all -doc packages arch any instead of all.
(Easiler but less elegant
Package: haddock
Version: 2.4.1-3
Severity: grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kaol,
I was about to start packaging libraries for ghc6.10 (haskell-X11 to be
precise), using the just built haddock from incoming, when I this
this problem:
$ /usr/bin/haddock
[CC’ing d-haskell, this might be a larger annoyance]
Hi again,
Am Freitag, den 20.02.2009, 01:18 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I was about to start packaging libraries for ghc6.10 (haskell-X11 to be
precise), using the just built haddock from incoming, when I this
this problem
Hi,
for those that didn’t stumble over it:
Am Donnerstag, den 15.01.2009, 01:10 +0200 schrieb Kari Pahula:
haskell-devscripts needs to be updated, since it will still put in
-999 instead of + in some cases. See #511857. After that, the
following will need to be binNMUd (did I miss any?):
+
+ * Fix dh_haskell_prep generates postinsts that fail with ghc6
+6.8.2dfsg1-1 by looking at the contents of the ghc6 package, instead
+extracting the version from the package version (Closes: #512063)
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:24:51 +0100
+
haskell
Package: link-monitor-applet
Version: 3.0-2
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this is kind of a FTBFMS bug (Fails To Build From Modified Source).
Since I know have a 16:9 screen, I really need to get rid of the icon.
But when I try to compile it, I get:
Type
Hi,
I notice that missingh has no versioned binary dependencies. John, is
there a good reason why this is the case (in contrast to most other
haskell library packages around), and why you are not using
haskell-utils or haskell-devscripts for this package?
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata
Hi,
so you found out how to correctly build against the new xulrunner? And
the bindings do work? Great! I’ll see when I can find time to do the
upload, but might be until next week – gtk2hs just too slow to build.
Greetings,
Joachim
Am Freitag, den 20.06.2008, 11:52 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
# not RC, as no ia64 binary is in stable/testing
forcemerge 481593 483162
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I got a last build problem for the Debian package, this time on s390,
and the problem appears in a different package: gtkrsync does not build,
and the maintainer believes the problem lies within the gtk2hs package:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 02.06.2008, 11:59 +0200 schrieb Axel Simon:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 11:48 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
I got a last build problem for the Debian package, this time on s390,
and the problem appears in a different package: gtkrsync does not build
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
# release scripts seem to be confused because this bug was not closed âinâ
missing
notfound 477007 1.0.1.0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Am Montag, den 14.04.2008, 19:20 +0200 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 21:06 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Version: 0.7r1785-2
Hi,
I removed powerpc from the list of architectures. On the upstream
mailing list I was told that there is little chance
Hi,
I have just uploaded a new version of xaralx. Once the powerpc version
was autobuilt, would you care to check if this bug is still present:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=382658
You can track the state of the build on:
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=xaralx
Thanks,
Package: libghc6-happs-dev
Version: 0.9.2.1-1
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
libghc6-happs-dev does not depend on these packages, although it should
(not installable otherwise):
libghc6-stm-dev
libghc6-html-dev
libghc6-xhtml-dev
libghc6-http-dev
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 14.03.2008, 12:54 -0400 schrieb Matthew Danish:
gtk2hs packages currently do not have up-to-date versions in unstable
for amd64 because of a very small issue: they attempt to force the
usage of gcc-4.1 which will not work with GHC 6.8 on amd64. I have
successfully
[Resending to the bug, for the record]
Hi,
Am Montag, den 11.02.2008, 19:04 +0100 schrieb Rubén Porras:
2008/2/11, Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 11.02.2008, 17:15 +0100 schrieb Rubén Porras:
2008/2/11, Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
sorry
Hi Ruben,
you said that the bug is still present in 0.6-2. Can you please
elaborate how the bug apperas in 0.6-2? Or are you refering to the fact
that you can not get rid of 0.6-1 in a properly manner?
Greetings,
Joachim
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 22:15 + schrieb Debian Bug Tracking
Hi Ruben again,
sorry for all these mails.
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 22:15 + schrieb Debian Bug Tracking
System:
retitle 0.6-2 Depends on non-available package
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Now I see what you were trying to do. Note that I’m tracking this issue
Package: libghc6-xmonad-contrib-dev
Version: 0.6-1
Severity: serious
Hi myself and other people looking at this list,
xmonad-contrib currently has a versioned build dependency and dependency
on libghc6-x11-dev 1.4.1, which is not yet in debian. This bug is here
to track this.
Greetings,
Joachim
Hi,
Am Montag, den 11.02.2008, 17:15 +0100 schrieb Rubén Porras:
2008/2/11, Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
sorry for the bug, it was a little mistake with the dependencies. Fixed
version is being uploaded.
If you have trouble removing the package, try to remove
the /lib
Hi,
sorry for the bug, it was a little mistake with the dependencies. Fixed
version is being uploaded.
If you have trouble removing the package, try to remove
the /lib/dpkg/info/libghc6-xmonad-contrib-dev.postrm file before trying
to remove it, it might help.
Greetings,
Joachim
Am Montag, den
Package: xmonad
Version: 0.6-1
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi myself and other people looking at this list,
xmonad currently has a versioned build dependency on libghc6-x11-dev
1.4.1, which is not yet in debian. This bug is here to track this.
Greetings,
Version: 0.6.2-1
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 03.02.2008, 01:22 +1000 schrieb Kel Modderman:
On Friday 01 February 2008 21:58:14 Kel Modderman wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008 21:11:03 Joachim Breitner wrote:
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.6.1~git20071119-1
Severity: serious
Hi
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.6.1~git20071119-1
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
trying to recompile the package here I get this error:
/usr/share/qt3/bin/uic wpagui.ui -o .ui/wpagui.h
uic: File generated with too recent version of Qt Designer (4.0 vs.
Package: gtk2hs
Version: 0.9.12-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
ghc6.8 is now in unstable, and gtk2hs needs to be re-built. This will
most likely also require an upgrade to 0.9.12.1.
Liyang HU, will you be able to do this?
Thanks,
Joachim
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers
Hi,
Am Montag, den 19.11.2007, 09:05 +0100 schrieb Bastian Blank:
Package: haskell-x11-extras
Version: 0.4-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of haskell-x11-extras_0.4-2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by
sbuild/s390 98
[...]
Package: yarssr
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
Duncan Gilmore reported this issue to me:
Am Freitag, den 26.10.2007, 03:19 +0100 schrieb Duncan Gilmore:
Hi Joachim,
Thanks for maintaining the yarssr package for Debian...
I noticed a client-side code execution
Hi Lucas, Hi Ana,
Am Montag, den 22.10.2007, 12:10 +0200 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
On 22/10/07 at 05:51 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
Time to NMU?, I would do, but it is your patch...
Uploaded to DELAYED/3 with the attached patch, to give a change to
Joachim to upload himself before!
sorry for
Hi,
these bugs #444196 and #444824 are probably related...
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libghc6-haskell-src-dev
Version: 1.0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package depends on ghc6.6+, please re-build it so that it can be
installed with sid’s current version ghc 6.6.1.
Thanks,
Joachim
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
Hi,
I just checked: running
debian/control update-generated-files
and rebuilding works just fine.
If you want me to upload the package with this modification, just say
so.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 07.09.2007, 10:59 +0200 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Joachim Breitner:
I think mounting the file system no-exec covers that. IIRC,
Subversion directly executes the hook scripts, and this will fail in
that case.
Then this should be mentioned in the file. I also think
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 07.09.2007, 00:45 -0700 schrieb Kaleb Pederson:
Thanks Florian,
The following are now disabled for svn:
editor-cmd,
diff-cmd,
diff3-cmd, (just added)
config-dir,
But that does not prevent commiting to a repository with hooks, right?
You write in the security docs:
Am Freitag, den 07.09.2007, 10:49 +0200 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Joachim Breitner:
These files have specific filenames at specific locations relative to
the svn repository root.
But since I can put a repository _anywhere_ by just copying it there,
how do you want the admin to prevent
Hi Bastian,
I just uploaded 0.9.12-1 to the archive. Could you please see if the bug
is still present?
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
--
To
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 04.09.2007, 13:10 -0700 schrieb Kaleb Pederson:
Yes, you are exactly right. This was discovered a while ago and documented
in
our SECURITY document currently only in CVS. You can see it here:
suggestions and/or comments, please let us
know.
Thanks.
--Kaleb
On Tuesday 04 September 2007, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
please read through:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437148
Basically: Allowing svn or svnserve is unsafe.
Greetings,
Joachim
Hi Cyril,
in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423773#10 you write
that the bug is fixed, and you specify “0.6.17-1” as the version it is
fixed in. That version number does not seem to be gtk2hs’ nor ghc6’s
version − what package is it? If the bug was fixed somewhere else than
in
Hi Lucas,
I just uploaded the new version, 0.9.12-1, to the archive. Could you
test your auto-build again with that?
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Hi Bastian,
I just uploaded 0.9.12-1 to the archive. Could you please see if the bug
is still present?
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 02.09.2007, 18:29 +0200 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Joachim Breitner:
This is an unfortunate interaction between scponly and Subversion, but
not a real bug in any of the programs. The same problem arises when a
scponly-restricted user uploads any form of executable
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 02.09.2007, 20:27 +0200 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Joachim Breitner:
You need write permission on the Subversion repository. I think it's
pretty obvious that you can change the Subversion hook scripts once
you've got them.
There are tons of programs which
Hi Michael,
I just came across this bug. Wouldn’t it make more sense to have a
dependency on libsmbios-dev only on those platforms that have it (amd64,
i386)?
e.g.:
Build-Depends: libsmbios-dev [i386 amd64]
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2007, 07:58 +0200 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Joachim Breitner:
messing around with some friends here, I tried to access his computer
with only a scponly protected account. I discovered this way of gaining
full shell access:
I locally created a subversion
Package: scponly
Version: 4.6-1
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi Thomas Wana,
messing around with some friends here, I tried to access his computer
with only a scponly protected account. I discovered this way of gaining
full shell access:
I locally created a
Hi,
unfortunately, I do not have a USB cardreader, so of course patches are
very welcome :-)
Otherwise maybe Moritz can comment on that. Moritz, are you still
working on libpam-poldi?
Greetings from DebConf,
Joachim
Am Freitag, den 08.06.2007, 14:05 +0200 schrieb Alexander Wirt:
Package:
Package: libghc6-filepath-dev
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
filepath is currently not installable, as it Depends on ghc6 6.6+, but the
current version is 6.6.1. A simple re-compilation is enough, no code
changes necessary (tested locally).
Thanks,
Joachim
-- System Information:
Debian
Hi,
bug #421684 might be a problem with libgnome2-vfs-perl. Does anyone feel
like checking that? Maybe a recompile is all it takes so solve it, maybe
not.
Greetings,
Joachim
Am Samstag, den 05.05.2007, 18:45 +0200 schrieb Frank Pavageau:
Hi.
I've got the same problem since last night, when
Hi,
thanks for the patch. Some questions:
* Did you send your patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I can’t see it
there.
* It is always easier for the maintainer if the patch is against the
deebian sources, not the original sources. Basically what you sent me is
a new debian package, not a patch on the
Hi,
thanks for the info. I will fix the debian/rules when a working powerpc
patch is available (or a new version is uploaded anyways). I think Alex
Bligh, who wrote the patch, monitors xaralx pts mails, so maybe he can
comment on the crash.
Greetings,
Joachims
Am Samstag, den 24.02.2007, 19:31
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 19.01.2007, 16:13 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 12:52:56AM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 11:35:19PM +, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Do I need to take action or will xaralx be removed automatically from
etch now
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 20.01.2007, 11:37 + schrieb Alex Bligh:
FWIW I'd tend to agree. It would be good to keep it in non-free (or
whatever) for if and when the guys at Xara focus on it again.
We keep it in Debian unstable’s non-free. I’m just saying that it is not
something we really need in
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 20.01.2007, 00:07 +0100 schrieb Aurélien GÉRÔME:
The powerpc package is unusable, so this bug is RC. To lower the
severity to important, you can ask for the removal of the powerpc deb
from the archive and restrict the build of xaralx to some architectures
where the package
Package: gaim-otr
Version: 3.0.0+cvs20060530-2
Severity: grave
Hi,
please see
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gaim?view=revrevision=17479
Gaim has changed the required values in the ui_requirement field of the
plugin info record, and currently the plugin is non-functional in beta4.
Package: gaim-encryption
Version: 3.0~beta5-3
Severity: grave
Hi,
please see
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gaim?view=revrevision=17479
Gaim has changed the required values in the ui_requirement field of the
plugin info record, and currently the plugin is non-functional in beta4.
Greetings,
Package: gaim-extendedprefs
Version: 0.5-5
Severity: grave
Hi,
please see
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gaim?view=revrevision=17479
Gaim has changed the required values in the ui_requirement field of the
plugin info record, and currently the plugin is non-functional in beta4.
Greetings,
Package: gaim-hotkeys
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
please see
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gaim?view=revrevision=17479
Gaim has changed the required values in the ui_requirement field of the
plugin info record, and currently the plugin is non-functional in beta4.
Greetings,
Package: tomboy
Version: 0.3.9-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
the package contains a lot of file in /var/lib/scrollkeeper, which is
most likely not right. Probably make install called scrollkeepr-update,
which it should not. See dh_scrollkeeper.
(I didn't look deeper, sorry for that)
Greetings,
Package: libghc6-hsql-dev
Version: 1.6-8
Severity: serious
Hi,
it seems that the package needs to be recompiled to be installable along
ghc6 6.4.2, which is in unstable now.
Greetings,
Joachim
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
severity important
thanks
Hi,
after some thought, I'm downgrading the severity of this bug. It sure
can break your loginability, but so can any pam module if installed
incorrectly. In this case I think we can expect that the admin tests it
first (e.g. staying logged in, testing only for su).
Package: libaqhbci8
Version: 1.6.2-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
I just tried to install libaqhbci8, but I can't:
apt-get install libaqhbci8
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible
Package: boson-base
Severity: serious
Hi,
I can'st install boson-base here:
# LANG=C apt-get install boson boson-base
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are
301 - 400 of 406 matches
Mail list logo
