to debian wouldn't take much long but I have no idea how to be
able to do that currently, maybe someone could contact me directly at
jwillem...@remedy.nl to discuss that.
Johnny
On 4/7/20 11:43 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 01:57:44PM +0200, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
&g
Hi,
Would help everyone when someone could upgrade ACE to 6.5.8, the most
recent micro
Johnny
Hi,
This issue has been fixed in ACE 6.4.4 which can be obtained from
http://download.dre.vanderbilt.edu/. At the moment someone can assist in
getting ACE uploaded again please contact me directly.
--
Johnny Willemsen
Remedy IT
Postbus 81 | 6930 AB Westervoort | The Netherlands
http
Hi,
Please create a pull request for the necessary changes, ACE is hosted
upstream at https://github.com/DOCGroup/ATCD/.
Best regards,
Johnny Willemsen
Remedy IT
On 11/07/2015 01:12 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Source: ace
> Version: 6.3.2+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Control: block
Hi,
It is just that someone needs to get ACE 6.2.7 and package that, support
for gcc 4.9 has been added upstream already some time ago.
I personally have all knowledge of ACE but not about packaging, but as
said, willing to help
Johnny
On 07/21/2014 01:25 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi,
Great, did you use the branch I created earlier this week?
Johnny
Op zondag 29 juni 2014 heeft Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org het
volgende geschreven:
Hello,
I am packaging ACE+TAO 6.2.7, which should solve #746825
Packaging is done. Now I need to do some QA. There are
Hi,
Thanks for your email. I am also interested in this, but I am unable to
pull code from the pkg-ace debian git repository. Nothing changed at my
side but I now get a public key error. I know all the details of
ACE/TAO, but the debian packaging guidelines are completely new to me. I
just
Hi,
This is already fixed upstream, an export is lacking
Hi, Johnny, thanks for the upstream help.
Is that fix included in latest 6.2.0 ACE upstream release?
Not 100% sure, you have to try it. It is part of the latest micro, 6.2.6.
Unfortunately seems that Debian ACE is way behind
Hi,
This is already fixed upstream, an export is lacking
Johnny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I'm more annoyed by #697848. The first two issues raised by Ansgar were
not yet discussed with upstream because I need a confirmation on what
is exactly the issue. If this is what I underlined in my reply then I
am afraid we will have no easy solution except for moving ace to
non-free.
I
Hi,
For the AW license, I would recommend to check that on the regular ACE
mailing list, the files where added by Doug Schmidt himself.
Theoretically TAO_IDL can be replaced at some point by ridlc as new IDL
compiler which doesn't have this license problem, but probably that is 6
months of
Hi,
On 23/01/2013 09:08, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
Agreed, but I believe Sun intent here was to ensure that
standardization and implementation efforts (IDL to C++ and IIOP
marshalling rules) do not get ruined by code modifications. Yes, I am
interpreting.
@Johnny: any opinion on this? See [1
Hi,
This file has already been removed from the latest ace versions.
Johnny
Op 18 jun. 2011 om 16:56 heeft Sam Geeraerts sam...@elmundolibre.be het
volgende geschreven:
Source: ace
Version: 5.7.7-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 2.1.6, 2.1.7
User:
Hi,
I will commit the file tomorrow upstream
Johnny
On Sunday, August 22, 2010, Marek Brudka mbru...@aster.pl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Revision 706
(http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-ace?view=revrevision=706) contains
new configuration file for
Hi,
Looks a problem with visibility. What is the exact GCC version used?
Johnny
On 08/16/2010 02:51 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Package: ace
Version: 5.7.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi maintainer,
Your package fails to build from source on armel:
g++ -Wl,-O3 -D_REENTRANT
Hi,
I think the first step is to really port ace to this platform using
config.h/platform_macros.GNU, this hasn't been tried before.
Johnny
On 08/11/2010 06:40 PM, Petr Salinger wrote:
Hi,
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-ace/trunk/debian/config.h?revision=704pathrev=704
does not work.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Looks like the wrong config file is included.
Johnny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMWTJMAAoJEF6eObUNSFTQljwIANevpvaFDQd+tKlC0ehVU3ry
Hi,
Is there anyone at debian who has experience with opensuse build service? If
someone can take x.7.4 and see what has to be done to the
ACE_wrappers/debianbuild package in the distribution, we can integrate it.
We really would like to see ACE support debian package support out of the
box.
Hi,
Is there anyone at debian who has experience with opensuse build
service? If
someone can take x.7.4 and see what has to be done to the
ACE_wrappers/debianbuild package in the distribution, we can
integrate it.
We really would like to see ACE support debian package support out of
Hi,
All the files from Thomas are part of the distribution, see
ACE_wrappers/debianbuild. Part is updated, if you have patches for these
debian package file, send them to the list, then we can integrate it.
What is the real problem?
Johnny
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Luk Claes
Hi,
I would propose yout take a short at 5.7.4, all debian files from Thomas are
under ACE_wrappers/debianbuild. We really want to get debian support inside
the package, just as we did with rpm support for fedora/rhel under rpmbuild.
Johnny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
21 matches
Mail list logo
