* Mark Purcell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20061207 06:46]:
> While we await a decision from debian-release. Could you post
> packages to either experimental or people.debian.org so we can
> start the integration.
Sure. I have limited airtime on the network; will do my best.
Peter
--
.+'''+.
* To Mark Purcell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20061206 16:43]:
> I have an almost ready 0.12 packaged. 0.11 was skipped due to
> the misunderstandings around sonames and C++ ABI upgrades. The
> release managers allow upload of 0.12, I can do it today at
> midnight UTC. If you have changes other than t
Mark,
I have an almost ready 0.12 packaged. 0.11 was skipped due to
the misunderstandings around sonames and C++ ABI upgrades. The
release managers allow upload of 0.12, I can do it today at
midnight UTC. If you have changes other than the bugs, please
send them to me.
Peter
--
.+'''+.
* Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060615 23:35]:
> checking whether select() modifies the time value... no
> And you should probably look at why the configure script returns
> that.
I can't reproduce it on any platform. Care to attach config.log?
Peter
--
.+'''+. .+'''+.
* Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060615 19:23]:
> whowatch.o: In function `main':
> /build/buildd/whowatch-1.6.0a/src/whowatch.c:288: undefined reference to
> `read_key'
Which platform is this?
Peter
--
.+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+''
Kelemen Péte
* Lars Wirzenius ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060408 13:22]:
> [...] c) what happens if xinetd or some other inetd
> implementation is installed instead of inetd?
Dunno. Is there a generic framework for handling inetd/xinetd?
Peter
--
.+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+.
* Loïc Minier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20050716 19:49]:
> Do you have a .gnome2/session-manual file? Please attach it if you do.
I don't have either. However, I scrubbed GNOME completely and
reinstalled from experimental/sid, and the problem went away, so
I'm not concerned any more.
Peter
--
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20050704 15:30]:
> What if you remove gaim from your session? It is known to have a
> broken session handling. (Same question for xpad, but I doubt
> this one is at fault.)
Removing either or both of them does not change the situation.
Even removing the ~/
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20050704 12:46]:
> Please attach your .gnome2/session file.
Here you are.
Peter
--
.+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+''
Kelemen Péter / \ / \ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+' `+...+'
Package: gnome-control-center
Version: 1:2.10.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrade, GNOME session startups are blocked by
/usr/lib/control-center/gnome-settings-daemon sitting in a read()
syscall and not advancing. Reproduced on two different hardware.
-- Sys
10 matches
Mail list logo