On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:35:16PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> I believe this is a serious bug, since it affects the most common way
> to deploy bind9 server which is in a chroot.
> In my opinion, we should probably not release stable stretch with
> bind9 in this state.
>
> This is
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> $ grep lmtp /etc/postfix/master.cf
> lmtp unix - - y - - lmtp
Is there by any chance any trailing whitespace on that line?
lamont
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:43:16PM -0500, James Cloos wrote:
> shlib_directory=/usr/lib/postfix/lib
> daemon_directory=/usr/lib/postfix/daemons
I've been kicking this around with Scott K, and we're going to go with
shlib_directory=/usr/lib/postfix
Package: anope
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
If the daemon is not running, reload should fail. It currently passes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:34:43PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 08:29:14AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
Package: anope
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
If the daemon is not running, reload should fail. It currently passes.
Really? A quick review of init
severity 773170 important
--
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 09:33:16AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:58:09 +0100 Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com
wrote:
Well, postfix uses Required-start: $named because it needs name
resolution. And I guess dnsmasq provides $named by
tag 741285 + moreinfo
--
I'll need someone with kfreebsd to provide a patch.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 08:52:42PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:42:29PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
I'd like to echo this; 9.9.x has useful and important functionality
for DNSSEC deployment.
The bug in question seems to be a repeat of #720813 which was
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:19:49PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Doti wrote:
I've been able to solve the problem by adding this line to the conf
(main.cf) :
smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated,
permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
but I'm not sure there will be no side
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:53:01AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Given these, I am not convinced that this should be RC for wheezy.
How about a NEWS item drawing attention to the issue and workaround,
and a downgrade to
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:31:00AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: bind9
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00828
Stable is not affected. This needs to be fixed through
testing-proposed-updates,
since the
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:05:06PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:42:11PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
That should be fine, thanks!
What's the status?
fix-committed, one more bug to decide how
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:33:27PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:48:30AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote [edited]:
I'll ponder this an get back with you on Monday (US time).
and? what about my earlier proposal of using debconf only if it happens to be
installed?
Well
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:38:41PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Lamont, are you fine with an NMU?
This bug has been open for a long time and needs to be fixed for Squeeze
soon.
I have another upload for util-linux that I'm planning doing late this week
or monday. (566072)
Is that soon
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:41:37PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
Please consider the attached patch that displays a warning using debconf. Note
that I've added the warning in the postinst script (as opposed to preinst, as
suggested in msg #54 of this bug report) so that it suffices to Depend
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 06:58:21PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Clint Adams wrote:
Is there a legitimate reason to set a pass number if you actually do not want
the filesystem to be checked?
I would say probably not. But in the past, I (and others) would
often cut-and-paste fstab lines, then
Good point. OTOH, an actual bit of content in the bug would have
helped simplify the work of understanding what your issue was.
lamont
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 04:05:10PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Severity: serious
Package: bind9
Version: 1:9.7.1.dfsg-1
User:
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:05:10PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
retitle 588055 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D
The issue is identical to the issue in the last bug report? But right,
I have retitled this bug report now so at least it has the same subject.
In which case,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:54:44PM +0200, Michael Braun wrote:
Package: bind9
Version: 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P3-1+lenny1
Today, named crashed suddenly after a few hours of operation with
the failed assertion mentioned above. This in turn broke DHCP, as DNS
was no longer resolvable, which in turn made
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:24:18AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
This source package contains the following files from the
IETF under non-free license terms:
Nice boilierpate bug. I thought I had gotten all of these, I'll deal with
the rest shortly.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:35:58AM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
tags 554585 + help
Most likely, it's related to these errors, or something similar:
../nbtk/nbtk-widget.c: In function 'nbtk_widget_get_pseudo_classes':
../nbtk/nbtk-widget.c:853: warning: return from incompatible pointer
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:04:23AM +0200, Mader, Alexander (N-MSR) wrote:
Something additional: I am running a Debian kernel not a self built one,
and /lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules was not there in the first place
so I had to create it.
That file is delivered by util-linux what
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 02:54:31PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
No response from the maintainers, no action, raising the priority.
that is happening again and again, although it never happened in all
the many years I am using Debian before. Now it
is getting a pain, esp when you are
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 09:00:24PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
You are right. However I'm the maintainer of that package as well and it seems
to be used by about the same number of users. I think that package can
be removed as well.
Also, nmap 5.00-3 will Provide/Replace: ndiff in addition to
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 07:47:59AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
i'm talking about a network being disrupted, not a single host.
the hosts DON'T have 127.0.0.1 in resolv.conf, they have the namesever.
I've gone back as far as 9.2.4, and haven't found anywhere that the
bind9 package actually kept
-by: LaMont Jones lam...@debian.org
OTOH, that commit lacks changes to not stop it on upgrade.
an even better option is for the bind9 package to actually make some
effort to minimise downtime by restarting after upgrade rather than
stopping early and starting late.
And it would appear that I
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:47:16AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
when upgrading bind9, named is stopped until the upgrade is completed.
And there is no real way to make sure it stays working while the
libraries and such are changed out from under it, based on some of the
issues we ran into
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:52:15AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
In any case as you state that ndiff has changed a lot in the recent
years I think we should remove the ndiff package anyway as it would not
work. Unmaintained software is not good to keep in the archive unless
some Debian developer
tags 516616 + help moreinfo
forcemerge 516616 520688
--
This will need someone in the mips / mipsel porting world to provide a
patch for bind9 to fix it.
lamont
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:02:51PM +0100, Rainer Canavan wrote:
This problem has also been reported on the mips architecture
and
tags 524574 + unreproducible
severity 524574 normal
--
Nothing in the postfix config would cause us to chgrp
/var/spool/postfix/etc to the sasl group, nor would we chmod 710 that
directory. I rather suspect this is a bug in another package.
lamont
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:39:25AM +0200,
Package: texlive-base
Severity: critical
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-4
While building matplotlib on hppa, the following error occurred:
(see
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=matplotlibver=0.98.5.3-1arch=hppastamp=1243891746file=log
)
tags 521271 + moreinfo unreproducible
--
What version of the various packages do you have? Installing dnsutils
in a virgin sid chroot on amd64 gives me a working nslookup, with the
correct libraries all present, and I don't see anywhere that the
dependencies for dnsutils are incorrect.
lamont
tag 515110 + wontfix
severity 515110 wishlist
--
It is perfectly reasonable to ask the kernel what we are, and build
accordingly. Given the valid solution of using linux32, I don't see
that this is even a bug. Leaving it open anyway, but won't be fixing
it.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:33:46AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
While browsing through the list of release critical bugs searching for
something I could do for Lenny, I noticed that your package bind9 has a
release critical bug open for more or less a year.
And serious for nearly
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 05:37:54PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I uploaded the following changes to delayed/3.
Lamont, if you do not like these changes, please upload alternate fixes,
but do not block them.
Any chance you have the diff in a sane (separate commit per change)
diff, or just
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 05:47:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BIND 9.5.1rc1 is now available (since today):
http://oldwww.isc.org/sw/bind/view/?release=9.5.1rc1
Yeah, I have the patch for just that bug backported, will be uploading
this week sometime.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:17:43AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
bind9 in lenny has several problems with ACL parsing. Emmanuel Bouthenot
investigated those, and contacted upstream, who provided a patch that
backports several fixes from the new upstream release (not yet
released).
I'll be
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:16:12PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Will you upload a fixed package soon? Do you want someone to NMU or do
you think the fix is not ready?
I'm still not sure if the patch is just masking an issue, or if it's a
proper fix.
And no, a random NMU is not the right answer for
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 09:09:28PM +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
Here are the two files you need in attachment.
include /etc/bind/named.conf.options;
I need this file as well...
include /etc/bind/named.conf.local;
If there is anything other than zone declarations here, I'd like it,
too.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:19:06PM +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
If I want to stop or to restart bind9, I can't by default. I get this message
:
Stopping domain name service...: bindrndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953:
connection refused
failed!
Starting domain name service...: bind failed!
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:53:08AM -0400, Magnus Heinz wrote:
postfix can't resolve hostnames anymore.
The problem appeard 2 days ago.
The mail.log shows:
postfix/smtp[8659]: 7D5E1971C4: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none,
delay=0.02, delays=0.02/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.4, status=bounced (unable to
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:41:34PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
* Add support for syslogd configuration files under /etc/syslog.d/.
(Closes: #370349, #462739)
Do you think this bug can now also be solved on the postfix side?
From reading the bug report, it would appear that he added
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:58:43PM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote:
I've been holding off upgrades to DNS here for a week and a half
on this bug, since I don't know if upgrading is going to cause me
problems. Is anything happening on this?
I have yet to reproduce it either in testing with
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0700, Ben Holt wrote:
bind9 dies with the following showing in the logs:
Mar 20 03:51:02 firewall named[5714]: adb.c:2617: INSIST(bucket == (-1))
failed
Mar 20 03:51:02 firewall named[5714]: exiting (due to assertion failure)
This has happened three times,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 12:01:57AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
This bug introduce a serious risk of loosing important log data, which
is - especially for a MTA - not acceptable. Asking people to restart
postfix after reloading syslog is a *stupid* workaround, which also
results in the loss of
severity 311812 important
--
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:17:12PM +, Alexander Wirt wrote:
severity 311812 grave
It's only grave if the bug is against syslogd. Syslogd doesn't provide
a method for postfix to change the config file, and therefore it would
be a policy violation for postfix to
+ * Fix implicit definitions throughout. Closes: #441115
+
+ -- LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:38:18 -0600
+
expect (5.43.0-13) unstable; urgency=low
* Applied patch from Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
diff -urN t/expect-5.43.0/debian/patches/00list expect-5.43.0/debian
tags 443089 + moreinfo
--
dpkg --fsys-tarfile postfix_2.3.8-2+b1_i386.deb | tar tvf - | grep
postfix-script
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 6840 2007-03-21 05:17 ./etc/postfix/postfix-script
I'm at a loss to understand how this file _isn't_ on your system.
Any ideas?
lamont
I expect that
tags 435634 + etch
--
Forwarding to the bts.
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:18:47AM +0200, Falk Siemonsmeier wrote:
Am Do 02.08.2007 16:28 schrieb LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could you load the latest nfs-common and mount from sid and see if
that
resolves the problem?
I just tested
reassign 435983 mdadm
--
done
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 03:44:32PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 04, James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LABEL=foo entries can no longer be mounted;
I love generalizations...
So, whatever populates /dev/disk/by-label is not aware of (LVM2 MD),
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 02:43:04PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
Everything worked fine 'til I upgraded...
So, whatever populates /dev/disk/by-label is not aware of (LVM2 MD),
and since mount no longer itself supports LABEL= directly, mount fails
to mopunt perfectly good filesystems. This
tags 435537 + moreinfo
--
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:25:48AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
Preparing to replace mount 2.12r-19 (using .../mount_2.13~rc2-5_amd64.deb) ...
You have NFS mount points currently mounted, and this version of mount
requires that nfs-common be upgraded before NFS
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:35:07AM +0200, Falk Siemonsmeier wrote:
When try to mount
mount -o mountvers=2,nfsvers=3 netapp:/vol/vol_bc/bc_homes /media
I get
Segmentation fault
Could you load the latest nfs-common and mount from sid and see if that
resolves the problem?
thanks,
lamont
--
Package: gettext
Version: 0.16.1-1
Severity: serious
/usr/bin/autopoint contains the following excuse for requiring cvs:
# The requirement that the user must have the CVS program available is not
# a severe restrictions, because most of the people who use autopoint are
# users of CVS.
#
# Check
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:20:47AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
| ./sys_defs.h:749:25: error: operator '' has no left operand
I'd be interested to see the cpp output, as I've been unable to
reproduce this.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 09:00:28PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
Contrary to its being marked Fixed this error still appears on my system
every time I apt-get upgrade. Here's a cut-and-paste:
Interesting... It would appear that you didn't upgrade
/etc/postfix/postfix-script at some point in the
Package: bind8
Severity: serious
Version: 8.4.7-3
BIND 8 is old and crufty and should not be in Lenny.
thanks,
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:08:13PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
As it has already been deprecated in README.Debian and the upgrade path
from bind to bind9 can hardly be done in an automated manner, it should
be sufficient to simply have bind8 removed? Or should we add a note
into the
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 06:54:43PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Bind 8 is obsolete and should not be included in Lenny, which would
require to support it at least until 2011.
Absolute agreement here.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
forcemerge 415670 415727
--
After upgrading postfix in Debian etch from 2.3.7 to 2.3.8, postfix does not
allow any connections to port 25 any more, it simply does not
respond. The /var/log/mail.log (and mail.warn and mail.info) are filled with
lines like:
See #415670.
lamont
--
To
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:15:33AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
../../lib/libdns.a: undefined reference to `_info'
Well, that's a different error than I've seen on the mipsel buildd for
unstable... Which I also haven't been able to reproduce
Can you capture the failed build tree for
severity 411872
merge 411872 410871
--
And fixed in 2.3.7-3
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.12r-17
Severity: serious
If built with sudo, util-linux doesn't deliver the mount deb. This is
bad.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
close 411749
merge 411749 410871
tags 411749 + etch
--
Postfix postinst fails when inetd does not have any services enabled. (At
least) in this case, the call to update-inetd on line 177 dumps some output
And fixed in 2.3.7-3
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:07:45AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
On 2/14/07, LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:23:43PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
There is also no complaint about the service already being started:
# /etc/init.d/postfix start
Starting Postfix
severity 411071 serious
close 411071
merge 411071 410781
--
This was exposed by update-inetd changing, and is fixed in 2.3.7-3
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
postfix.postinst). My attempts to install postfix from experimental
failed in the same way, as did
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:23:43PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
On 2/14/07, LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The installation worked fine, but there now seems to be something else
# mailq
postqueue: warning: Mail system is down -- accessing queue directly
If postfix was not running
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:03:55PM +, Mark Purcell wrote:
I'm also a little curious that this is only happening on ia64, if it was a
source problem I would imagine it would also be occurring on other arch's as
well.
Perhaps we could reschedule a rebuild, or how can I get the necessary
severity 398449 important
merge 398449 386226
--
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 03:36:18AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386226
Merged.
Thanks,
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 03:31:05PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 02:32:00PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Can you try adding CFLAGS=-g -Wall -ffunction-sections at the bottom
of debian/rules? It works fine on merulo at least.
-ffunction-sections stands a good chance of
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:48:54AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This problem seem to have solved itself, as the hppa binary is
uploaded and the latest build log claim it built just fine. Closing
it as fixed.
Thanks - I was unable to reproduce it, and a simple give-back let the
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 10:23:59AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I am unable to find any newer version in /usr/share/misc/. We use
config.guess dated 2006-07-02 and config.sub dated 2006-09-20. What
version do we have to use to get the source built on hppa?
Something from 2004 or so...
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:07:42PM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about using the system inotify syscall numbers and such instead of
private ones???
Ehhh, I don't know why they do that. Maybe so that they can verify that
those arches work first? Who knows...
Package: libsvn-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 1.4.0-5
In the build attempt of medsua found at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=medusaver=1.2-1%2Bb1arch=i386stamp=1161300496file=log
the following errors show up:
i486-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -g -DDEBUG -fPIC -I/usr/local/include
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:33:34PM +0200, Patrik Wallstrom wrote:
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006, Micah Anderson wrote:
Does this patch work with just plain ole 'bind' (not bind9)? That
package also seems vulnerable...
No, there are separate packages för BIND 8. (All BIND users should
upgrade to
reopen 287812
--
g++ -c -pipe -Iplatform -Ircxlib -Inqc -Icompiler -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -I/usr/local/include/LegoUSB -Wno-deprecated
-DDEFAULT_SERIAL_NAME='/dev/rcx' nqc/nqc.cpp -o nqc/nqc.o
cc1plus: warning: command line option -Wstrict-prototypes is valid for
Package: vpopmail-bin
Severity: serious
Version: 5.4.4-1
vpopmail-bin Depends: libmysqlclient10, which is no longer in the
archive, making the package uninstallable.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 382386 + patch
thanks
This adds support for HPPA linux machines.
lamont
diff -ur t/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf
tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf
--- t/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf2006-08-10 22:50:08.0
+
+++ tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 02:34:44AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
After pinging Lamont on IRC, I decided to try the fix myself...
glib2.0 with debian/patches/999_ia64_atomic_ops_broken.patch removed built
fine on merulo (sid chroot).
ii gcc 4.1.1-3 The GNU C compiler
Is
by LaMont Jones from the ubuntu package)
lamont: can debian drop this now that we're using gcc 4.1?
I expect so. The good part is that it fails to build if we still need
it, rather than just building bad debs.
I'll test it out sometime soonish
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:25:33AM +0200, Martin Waitz wrote:
Package: mount
Version: 2.12r-9
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
It seems the new NFS4 patch is not entirely fixed as CFS does not work
with the new mount version. Going back to 2.12r-8 makes CFS work
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 09:33:26PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
I just did an upgrade on my laptop running Sid and found that I could
no longer mount a remote NFS share on my desktop. The NFS server is
running Sid as well with the nfs-user-server 2.2beta47-22 package.
Research showed that
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:22:26PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
find an updated patch attached.
How much longer should I wait for the latest and and most updated patch?
and what specifically makes this a policy violation and/or release
critical bug (thereby justifying serious, and
Package: libc6
Severity: serious
Version: 2.3.6-4
After initializing a mutex, regcomp zeros the structure. On
architectures that have non-zero free lock values (e.g., hppa) this
results in deadlock.
The following patch fixes the problem.
(See
Package: vpopmail-bin
Version: 5.4.4-1
Severity: serious
In a buildd chroot, attempting to install vpopmail-bin results in:
Unpacking vpopmail-bin (from .../vpopmail-bin_5.4.4-1_hppa.deb) ...
Checking vpopmail user...not exist.
Checking vchkpw group...not exist.
Creating vchkpw
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:47:46PM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Could you test forcing on the client side to mount it with udp. The patch
changes the default to tcp (maybe that could be reverted..).
% sudo mount -oudp -v foo.example.com:/tftpboot /mnt
mount: no type was given - I'll assume nfs
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:20:31PM +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
An /etc/ldap/ldap.conf file needs also to be in chroot.
In my case it has to have
TLS_REQCERT allow
in it.
Or, if you'd rather not have that in the chroot, use proxy:ldap:... for
the map entry. I'd rather not copy large chunks of
severity 348645 important
tags 348645 + unreproducible
--
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 09:37:14AM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 10 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Those 2 not-fully-installed packages cause me some wonder..
Running
reopen 326961
--
You need the 2nd half of the patch (found in my reply to the original
bug report, as well as below...)
thanks,
lamont
diff -urNad iproute-20041019/tc/paretonormal.c
tags 307210 + patch
--
The patch below fixes the problem.
thanks,
lamont
diff -ur t/nufw-1.0/src/nuauth/authsrv.c nufw-1.0/src/nuauth/authsrv.c
--- t/nufw-1.0/src/nuauth/authsrv.c 2005-03-03 01:23:54.0 -0700
+++
the detected heap corruption.
Additionally, the arguments to calloc are backwards.
The patch below fixes this.
lamont
=
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## normal.dpatch by LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
##
## All lines beginning
Sadly, I spoke too quickly... Here's the corrected patch, which also
fixes tc/paretonormal.c :-(
lamont
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## normal.dpatch by LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
##
## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
## DP: Correct calloc call
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:02:37PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
util-linux needs to be changed to account for the slang1 transition.
This is because util-linux has a versioned Pre-Depends on slang1a-utf8,
while slang1a-utf8 is now merely provided by libslang1-utf8, which does
not work with our
compile errors. Closes: Debian #300860
+
+ -- LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:58:54 -0600
+
klic (3.003-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Change maintainer address.
diff -ur t/klic-3.003/compiler/klic.c klic-3.003/compiler/klic.c
--- t/klic-3.003/compiler/klic.c1999-03-25 00
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 02:10:59PM +0200, Aurélien Labrosse EXT RSC-CIP-GRE
wrote:
Could you integrate the patch or at least change the dependency from
slang1a-utf8 to libslang1-utf8 ? This is needed to create pbuilder
images..
Just waiting for a libc6 upload to fix a header-file FTBFS, and
fixed in 2.2.2-1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:58:32AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Installing new version of config file /etc/postfix/postfix-files ...
postconf: error while loading shared libraries: libpostfix-global.so.1:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Are there any diversions of
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:26:41AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
I'm not convinced that this is actually a bug in defoma; the trouble is that
the failure happens in the fontconfig *pre*rm script, and fontconfig depends
on defoma -- so how is it possible that defoma's files have been removed
Package: defoma
Version: 0.11.8-0.1
Severity: serious
In the case where both defoma and, say fontconfig, are being removed in
the same dpkg run, defoma was removed first, and then fontconfig's prerm
script failed with:
Removing defoma ...
Purging configuration files for defoma ...
dpkg -
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
