I welcome your NMU! :-)
I've been backlogged and couldn't deal with this in a timely fashion.
Thank you for the help.
PS.: I think you forgot to attach the patch (not that it matters much)
On Dom, 2006-01-15 at 17:57 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> I intend to NMU camorama if you are not alread
Are you guys still on this?
I had some time today and I think I'll upload this with another few
bugfixes.
(with all the thanks, of course! :-) )
That ok?
Cheers
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 17:29 +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This is not an appropriate changelog entry, in an NMU or ot
On Ter, 2006-01-17 at 10:21 +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Sure! It's your package, it wants *your* love! :*
Ok, cool, then I'll upload it right away.
Sorry to make you guys work on it and then suddenly come around and fix
it myself! And thanks a lot for the poke anyway!
damn... I'm a slacker :-(
Cheers
Subject: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors
Package: amavis-ng
Version: 0.1.6.9-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After an upgrade, amavis started spewing a lot of emergency errors and
stoped working (bringing down all mail delivery with it).
I use the Courier m
Agreed on all accounts, this package should be removed.
Should I file a bug myself for its removal?
On Dom, 2005-09-11 at 16:25 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: icukrell
> Version: 2.0.0pre0.1-2
> Severity: serious
> After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will re
Hi,
A couple of news of interest:
Firstly, gaim-encryption has finally been uploaded to Debian's unstable
branch. It's now instalable by all Debian users, there's no more need
for my personal repository to contain Gaim-encryption's packages.
This might actually generate a lot of bug reports[1] and
This had completely slipped my mind.
Sorry for the noise, I received the bug report and forwarded it to you
without giving it the proper attention. I should have remembered this
before.
Anyway, no harm no foul.
Another very small thing that crossed my mind: when compiled with a
diferent Gaim vers
I think it's a safe bet:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/faq.html#q3.1
No harm, no foul.
Cheers and thanks again
On Qua, 2005-03-23 at 23:05 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10237 March 1977, Leo Antunes wrote:
>
> > About this bug, where is gaim-encryption linked with OpenSSL?
severity 337677 important
thanks
--
Check the severities list [1], this bug is not 'grave'.
Probably upstream, will look into it.
Thanks.
Cheers
[1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
On Sáb, 2005-11-05 at 19:07 +0100, Laurent CARON wrote:
Package: knockd
Version: 0.5-1
Seve
OK, hadn't notivced that, I'm going to contact debian-release and see if
we can get the new version pushed into Sarge.
Thanks for the heads up
On Sáb, 2005-06-04 at 23:30 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: gaim-encryption
> Version: 2.36-3
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sarge
>
>
> This is a remin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Btw, it's better to Cc the reporter if you want him to help ;) Reporters
> don't receive the mails sent to the bugs automatically.
True. Totally slipped my mind.
Thanks anyway!
Cheers
- --
Leo "costela&qu
11 matches
Mail list logo
