Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.7
Followup-For: Bug #851066
Okay, attached is that patch I mentioned in my previous message.
This patch adds a new option to update-flashplugin-nonfree:
--using
Specifies the name of a local tar file instead of attempting to
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.7
Followup-For: Bug #851066
Dear Maintainer,
This note is more for followers of this bug than the maintainer.
I decided to spend some non-trivial time to try and craft a patch
that would skip downloading and checking the little informatio
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.7
Followup-For: Bug #851819
___ _ _ _
| _ \_ _| \ | |/ ___| |
| |_) | || \| | | _| |
| __/| || |\ | |_| |_|
|_| |___|_| \_|\(_)
$ sudo update-flashplugin-nonfree
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.6.1+b1
Followup-For: Bug #832493
Same problem here, for about two weeks so far. And now
v11.2.202.626 has been blacklisted by Mozilla/Firefox, so all Flash-based
Web content is inaccessible until this is fixed.
-- Package-specific info:
Debian
Package: tex-common
Version: 6.05
Followup-For: Bug #824862
Dear Maintainer,
Also fails on x84_64. Failure log attached.
Schwab
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'test
Package: dnet-common
Version: 2.56
Followup-For: Bug #635604
Concur with previous reporters. I was experiencing mysterious
network stalls on the two machines on which dnet-common had been hauled in
as a dependency. It was only by serendipity that I figured out it was
decnet stomping on m
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:00:35PM +, Julien Cristau wrote:
> found 550977 2.6.30-8
Also persisted in 2.6.32-rc8. I haven't tried anything past that.
> tag 560126 - unreproducible
Actually, I was able reproduce it fairly reliably on this machine
(which is of limited help to
Further information:
- An extended 'smartctl' test revealed no errors. So it's probably
not the disk.
- 'debsums -s' reported errors for a couple of files in OpenOffice;
everything else was fine.
I also did some fiddling with options in xorg.co
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:45:35AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Leo L. Schwab wrote:
> > I've upgraded to the 'unstable' mesa libraries, and to the
> > 2.6.32-rc8 kernel. Same problems.
> >
>
> You may try upgrading to experimental now...
>
Package: drip
Version: 0.9.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Upon installing 'drip' 0.9.0-2 for the first time on this
machine, I attempted to run it, and was immediately greeted with the
following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ drip
drip: error while loading shared
10 matches
Mail list logo