Greetings,
Can you explain why you think that this bug should still be active? The
version 2.20 of shell-in-a-box builds against openssl 1.1. According to
the buildd, it has already been built for all of the architectures.
Perhaps I am misconstruing this issue in that 2.19 *is* going to be
r
From: Marc Singer
Date: Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#667938: shellinabox: depends on unavailable packages
To: Sven Joachim
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-04-07 21:27 +0200, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12
From: Marc Singer
Date: Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#667938: shellinabox: depends on unavailable packages
To: Sven Joachim
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-04-07 20:39 +0200, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-04-07 19:34 +0200, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> >> Package: shellinabox
> >> Version: 2.11-1
> >> Severity: grave
> >>
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: shellinabox
> Version: 2.11-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Your package is not installable:
>
>
I thought that that might come back to haunt me. Part of the trouble is
that the shlib:depends automatic
dependency won't include libssl. Do yo
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:31:25PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * beewoolie [2009-09-24 14:17]:
> > >[1] See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2009-09/msg00072.html
> > Will do. It may take a few days as my development box is offline.
>
> Is your system back or should I do an NMU?
Doing it right now.
BTW, this code is surprisingly complicated to do a simple function. I'll
add to my todo list
to revise apex-env so that it can emit a list of commands to save/restore
the environment
using a shell script.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:03:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the lemon package:
>
> #520557: lemon: lempar.c not C++ clean
>
> It has been closed by Zack Weinberg .
>
> Their explanation is
Package: lemon
Version: 3.5.9-6
Severity: serious
Justification: unknown
The lempar.c file includes the following lines:
/* The yyzerominor constant is used to initialize instances of
** YYMINORTYPE objects to zero. */
static const YYMINORTYPE yyzerominor;
This statement doesn't compile wi
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:49:14AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-05 18:21]:
> > Looks like an inadvertent change of the output file name. I'll fix
> > it and do an upload.
>
> ... or we simply stay with the new nam
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 12:30:05AM -0700, Gordon Farquharson wrote:
> Package: apex
> Version: 1.4.14
> Severity: important
>
> apex-nslu2 1.4.14 breaks the current debian-installer build because
> /boot/apex.flash no longer exists in the 1.4.14 deb.
>
> cp /boot/apex.flash ./tmp/ixp4xx_netboot/a
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:50:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Bug #394418 is a report filed regarding a recurring build problem with mono
> on arm that results from mono generating code that's incompatible with the
> arm v3 instruction set. Likewise, it appears shadow fails to buil
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:40:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:53:00PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:22:29PM -0400, Patricio Rojo wrote:
> > > Package: buici-clock
> > > Version: 0.4.5+b1
> > > Severity
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:22:29PM -0400, Patricio Rojo wrote:
> Package: buici-clock
> Version: 0.4.5+b1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After last upgrade of the X system, buici-clock got removed. When trying
> to reinstall it, I get the following message...
>
>
close 346639
Updated to autoconf2.59 so that the configure script can find the X
libraries without libxt being installed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:57:35AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 04:43:50PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> > I'm depending on libx11-dev installing libX11.a in /usr/X11R6/lib. Is
> > it there on the s390?
>
> It is, but /usr/X11R6/lib is not in th
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:30:10AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> reopen 346639
> found 346639 0.4.3
> thanks
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of buici-clock_0.4.3 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
> [...]
> > Checking for source dependency conflict
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:38:01AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Package: buici-clock
> Version: 0.4.2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
> build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
> no longer available
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.4-2sarge2
Followup-For: Bug #324473
Unlike the other reports, I don't ever see a window.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ > mozilla-firefox
(firefox-bin:12259): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_property_get(): length value has
wrapped in calculation (did you pass G_MAXLONG?)
19 matches
Mail list logo
