Bug#831265: elfutils: FTBFS: tests failures

2016-07-14 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 11:52 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: elfutils > Version: 0.165-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: stretch sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160714 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > [...] > >

Bug#810885: [PATCH] libelf: Add ELF compression types and defines to libelf.h for older glibc.

2016-01-14 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 18:37 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:20:17PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > Does the attached work for you? > > Yes. Thanks for testing. Pushed to master.

Bug#810885: [PATCH] libelf: Add ELF compression types and defines to libelf.h for older glibc.

2016-01-13 Thread Mark Wielaard
/bugreport.cgi?bug=810885 Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <m...@redhat.com> --- libelf/ChangeLog | 5 + libelf/libelf.h| 28 tests/ChangeLog| 8 tests/Makefile.am | 9 +++-- tests/syst

Bug#810885: libelf-dev requires libc >= 2.22

2016-01-13 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 16:58 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > But maybe I can fix the installed headers to not require a newer > glibc version ... I just posted an upstream fix to do this: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/elfutils-devel%

Bug#810885: [PATCH] libelf: Add ELF compression types and defines to libelf.h for older glibc.

2016-01-13 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 18:01 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Older glibc elf.h might not define the new ELF compression defines and > > types. If not just define them in libelf.h directly to make the libelf > >

Bug#748694: sys/sdt.h is architecture specific, and causing issues on unsupported architectures

2014-07-05 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Matthias, On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 17:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: re-raising the severity of the issue, and preparing a NMU to move the header file to an architecture specific location. What is the issue you are seeing? I thought that what you saw was something unrelated to sys/sdt.h. And

Bug#748694: sys/sdt.h is architecture specific, and causing issues on unsupported architectures

2014-07-05 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 18:32 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: could you tell me why you need the header on architectures that don't need it? Which architectures don't need it? Any architecture that support glibc and gdb for example benefits from having sdt markers available. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#748694: sys/sdt.h is architecture specific, and causing issues on unsupported architectures

2014-05-20 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 22:53 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Am 19.05.2014 21:00, schrieb Mark Wielaard: It is just the package name that refers to systemtap, but it could as well have been called gdb-sdt-devel for example. In which case it should at least work as is on any arch gdb supports

Bug#748694: sys/sdt.h is architecture specific, and causing issues on unsupported architectures

2014-05-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 20:17 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: The sys/sdt.h header file is shipped in an architecture independent package, and installed into /usr/include where it is found on the include path for every architecture. [...] what about issues on architectures not supported by

Bug#649038: elfutils FTBFS on kfreebsd

2013-11-13 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 23:31 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: On 11/11/2013 15:32, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 00:45 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: Nothing as far as ELF compliance is concerned. This tag is ment to be consumed by the kernel ELF loader only. For elfutils elflint

Bug#649038: elfutils FTBFS on kfreebsd

2013-11-11 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 00:45 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: ELFOSABI_FREEBSD indicates this binary has been built to run on kFreeBSD and uses its kernel ABI. If a binary is set to ELFOSABI_LINUX, then the kernel will enable Linux emulation mode, i.e. Linux syscall interface. Aha. Interesting.

Bug#649038: elfutils FTBFS on kfreebsd

2013-10-22 Thread Mark Wielaard
Two questions: - Would it help to just disable the testsuite on the kfreebsd arch? Clearly the package itself build fine. But some tests are failing. Although it would be nice to have 100% PASS as on GNU/Linux, the failures don't look too terrible for a new architecture that has not been

Bug#707438: valgrind: FTBFS: x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-V'

2013-05-09 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:18:58AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: valgrind Version: 1:3.8.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130509 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package

Bug#684825: elfutils: FTBFS: md5.c:108:3: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing]

2012-08-14 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 09:07 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -I. -I.. -I. -I. -I../lib -I.. -I./../libelf -std=gnu99 -Wall

Bug#558291: libtool issue

2010-01-30 Thread Mark Wielaard
The libtool error seems to have been resolved upstream with this patch: http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-January/006381.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#353555: jvm_find: command not found

2006-02-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
Package: eclipse-efj Version: 3.1.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable eclipse-efj wants to source /usr/share/java-common/java-common.sh which is not available. /usr/bin/efj starts with: #!/bin/bash source /usr/share/java-common/java-common.sh JAVA_HOME=`jvm_find ecj` if

Bug#307211: saxon-catalog: FTBFS (testing): Semantic Error: The abstract method java.lang.String getRawName(int $1);, inherited from type org.xml.sax.Attributes, is not implemented in the non-abstract class cz.kosek.CatalogXMLReader.

2005-05-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 15:19 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: And classpath is going nowhere fast, because the current version of gjdoc depends on kaffe, which is not built on arm. Note that the gjdoc dependency is only needed when you want to generate the documentation as published on

Bug#300388: libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java: FTBFS: NullPointerException

2005-03-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 15:34 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.text.DecimalFormatSymbols.setCurrency (DecimalFormatSymbols.java:397) at java.text.DecimalFormatSymbols.DecimalFormatSymbols (DecimalFormatSymbols.java:151) at