Bug#1041040: [Aspectc-developers] Fwd: Bug#1041040: aspectc++ autopkg tests fail with GCC 13

2023-07-25 Thread Olaf Spinczyk
e created to satisfy the clang parser are not 100% compatible with the real _Float types. So, it is possible that further improvements are needed. Cheers, Olaf On 25.07.23 16:58, Olaf Spinczyk wrote: Right. /usr/include/math.h does not include a template specialization of struct __iseqsig_t

Bug#1041040: [Aspectc-developers] Fwd: Bug#1041040: aspectc++ autopkg tests fail with GCC 13

2023-07-25 Thread Olaf Spinczyk
/4471659/raw I've also attached my buildlog from an ARM64 machine to this email. thanks for looking into this! On 7/24/23 10:39 AM, Olaf Spinczyk wrote: Hi! It seems that my previous commit was too simple. I hope that today's modification helps: olaf@x1:~/workspace2/AspectC++$ svn commit -m

Bug#953540: [Aspectc-developers] Fwd: Bug#953540: aspectc++: FTBFS on armel

2020-03-22 Thread Olaf Spinczyk
> > Hi Adrian, > > Olaf, the upstream developer, has a question regarding your patch to > aspectc++. > Would you mind having a look and ideally sharing your reply to everyone? > > Thank you! > -rt > > On 3/17/20 11:05 AM, Olaf Spinczyk wrote: >> Hi Reinhard!

Bug#853319: [Aspectc-developers] Fwd: Bug#853319: aspectc++: ftbfs with GCC-7

2017-08-31 Thread Olaf Spinczyk
1] https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/changes.html >>>>> [2] >>>>> template >>>>> __attribute__((always_inline)) inline TResult __Get__Z4mainv_1_0 >>>>> (TEntity , >>>>> AC::RT){ >>>>> typedef TJP__Z4mainv_1_0

Bug#853319: [Aspectc-developers] Fwd: Bug#853319: aspectc++: ftbfs with GCC-7

2017-08-31 Thread Olaf Spinczyk
. It is the only one that already uses g++-6. - Olaf On 08/31/2017 15:47, Olaf Spinczyk wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I already suspected that I should think longer about this. ;-) > > I agree that the interface of ac++ for configuring the language standard > is not very convenient.

Bug#853319: [Aspectc-developers] Fwd: Bug#853319: aspectc++: ftbfs with GCC-7

2017-08-31 Thread Olaf Spinczyk
t;> >>> instead of >>> >>> template >> typename TIdx0> >>> __attribute__((always_inline)) inline TResult __Get__Z4mainv_1_0 (TEntity >>> ()[TDim0], >>> TIdx0 >>> idx0, AC::RT){ >>> typedef TJP__Z4mainv_1_0&l

Bug#853319: [Aspectc-developers] Fwd: Bug#853319: aspectc++: ftbfs with GCC-7

2017-08-31 Thread Olaf Spinczyk
t; > >> I've uploaded a new package that simply ignores failures from tests. Not >> exactly an ideal >> situation because it renders the test ineffective. >> >> From what I understand I could instead dialer disable these the tests >> instead. But before

Bug#853319: [Aspectc-developers] Fwd: Bug#853319: aspectc++: ftbfs with GCC-7

2017-08-29 Thread Olaf Spinczyk
On 08/23/2017 12:07 PM, Olaf Spinczyk wrote: >> Hi! >> >> You can generate the config file easily with ag++ --gen_config. Sorry >> for the inconvenience. The background is that when I wrote the first >> ac++ tests, I did not want the makefile to depend on ag++. >

Bug#853319: [Aspectc-developers] Fwd: Bug#853319: aspectc++: ftbfs with GCC-7

2017-08-23 Thread Olaf Spinczyk
On 08/23/2017 17:57, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > On 08/23/2017 04:29 AM, Olaf Spinczyk wrote: >> Hi Reinhard, >> >> when trying to compile the tests, ac++ seems to have no (or an invalid) >> puma.config file. It doesn't find the system header files, e.g. stdio.

Bug#853319: [Aspectc-developers] Fwd: Bug#853319: aspectc++: ftbfs with GCC-7

2017-08-23 Thread Olaf Spinczyk
Hi Reinhard, when trying to compile the tests, ac++ seems to have no (or an invalid) puma.config file. It doesn't find the system header files, e.g. stdio.h and iostream. For 'make test' to succeed PUMA_CONFIG must point to a valid config file. Are you sure that there is one? Where do you set the

Bug#853319: [Aspectc-developers] Fwd: Bug#853319: aspectc++: ftbfs with GCC-7

2017-08-22 Thread Olaf Spinczyk
Hi Reinhard! Simon was here today and promised to look into it as soon as possible. I don't expect support for clang 4.0.1 to be difficult to integrate. Olaf On 08/22/2017 03:15, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > tags 853319 help > stop > > Hi AspectC++ Developers, > > gcc-7 is now used by default in