Op wo 19 apr 2023 om 06:04 schreef Anton Gladky :
>
> Hi,
>
> boost-defaults_1.81.0 is in experimental. But boost1.81
> is also available in the Debian Bookworm [1].
>
> [1] https://packages.debian.org/source/testing/boost1.81
Hi Anton,
Ah, it's even available in bpo, thanks a lot!
--
Olaf
Package: libc6
Version: 2.31-13
Followup-For: Bug #990069
X-Debbugs-Cc: olafvds...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
The original issue of not being able to open a new SSH connection during the
upgrade still seems to be present.
Greetings,
Olaf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
APT prefe
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 1:19 AM Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 1:12 PM Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:24 PM Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > > I wish somebody could contribute with exact steps on how to reproduce
> > >
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:24 PM Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> I wish somebody could contribute with exact steps on how to reproduce
> the issue. So far I've gotten some half attempts at that but they
> haven't been actionable for me.
Hi Otto,
I'd point to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
> Op za 22 mei 2021 om 23:30 schreef Otto Kekäläinen :
> > Would somebody like to review/test it?
Doesn't seem to be working for me:
# apt full-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packag
Op za 22 mei 2021 om 23:30 schreef Otto Kekäläinen :
>
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 4:18 PM Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> >
> >
> >> > But as said, the bug #988089 can only be fixed by a change in galera-4
> >> > debian/control. Changing the mariadb-10.5 debian/control to
> >> > recommends:gale
Op vr 14 mei 2021 om 09:53 schreef Otto Kekäläinen :
> Investigating (0) galera-4:amd64 < none -> 26.4.7-3 @un uN Ib >
> Broken galera-4:amd64 Conflicts on galera-3:amd64 < 25.3.25-2 ->
> 25.3.31-2+b1 @ii umU Ib >
> Considering galera-3:amd64 0 as a solution to galera-4:amd64 0
> Holding Back g
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 5:27 PM Michael Farmbauer
wrote:
> in the latest update the pid and socket files have been moved from
> /var/run/mysqld to /run/mysqld.
>
> The directory /run/mysqld must be created in the init files:
>
> /etc/init.d/mysql
> /var/lib/systemd/system/mariadb*
>
> Those file s
Should it be in unstable?
--
Olaf
ould you be willing to continue maintaining mytop if the conflict
with mariadb was resolved?
Greetings,
--
Olaf van der Spek
e/2.4.37 (Debian) OpenSSL/1.1.1a configured -- resuming
normal operations
[Mon Nov 26 14:14:21.281526 2018] [core:notice] [pid 3554] AH00094:
Command line: '/usr/sbin/apache2'
--
Olaf van der Spek
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:45 AM Jeremy Davis wrote:
> As of the (automated) installation of today's MariaDB server security update
> (10.1.37-0+deb9u1)
> all of our user's LAMP based appliances uninstalled mariadb-server (i.e.
> default-mysql-server,
> mysql-server, mariadb-server-10.1 & mariadb
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> su 17. kesäk. 2018 klo 10.27 Pirate Praveen (prav...@debian.org) kirjoitti:
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:57:18 +0800 Andy Li wrote:
>> > I'm sure you have been busy, but this issue has been there unfixed for
>> > several months.
>> > I wo
Dimitri John Ledkov:
> boost1.65 has been rejected by ftp-masters, on copyright reasons.
Hi Dimitri,
Got a link?
Not having Boost in Debian would be unfortunate. I'm sure there's a
way to resolve this.
Gr,
--
Olaf
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:24 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> MariaDB 10.3 needs to be finalized and imported into Debian. After
> that all the mess that are a fallout of a misfortunate upload of
> mariadb-10.2 to Debian unstable will start to become resolved. Until
> then we need to live w
Hi,
> Anyone else have any good ideas on how to handle this?
I do. The solution is quite simple: do not, ever, remove user data / databases.
It makes everything so much simpler, both on the user side and on the
dev side. No weird questions when installing, no databases gone by
accident..
--
Ol
Hi,
Any updates?
--
Olaf
Same as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854382 but
that one was only fixed in unstable, not stable..
--
Olaf
Dear Python team,
Is there anything I can do to help fix this bug?
Gr,
--
Olaf
Package: awscli
Version: 1.11.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: unkn
Dear Maintainer,
$ aws s3 ls
'AWSHTTPSConnection' object has no attribute 'ssl_context'
Gr,
Olaf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.1
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
2017-05-29 10:12 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý :
> I am not sure about that. We still live in the strange dichotomy where
> we consider that MySQL server might get installed from different
> repository (or unstable) and the original "mytop" is meant to be used
> with MySQL server (from Oracle).
Is the one
NS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
> Knot Resolver (https://www.knot-resolver.cz/) – secure, privacy-aware,
> fast DNS(SEC) resolver
> Vše pro chleba (https://vseprochleba.cz) – Mouky ze mlýna a potřeby pro
> pečení chleba všeho druhu
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2
2017-05-08 11:42 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý :
> Definitely, I am just building the fixed version. I did a cleanup of
> upstream files not being installed in the last bigger mariadb update,
> and I was just not aware mytop was already packaged. Sorry for the
> troubles.
Shouldn't it also declare a Repla
Hi Ondřej,
Shouldn't it conflict / replace the mytop pkg?
2017-05-08 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ondřej Surý :
> Hi Olaf,
>
> mytop is part of MariaDB a version that fixes little bugs here and
> there:
>
> +=item Michael "Monty" Widenius
> +
> +Fixed a couple of minor bugs that gave warnings on startup.
> +
Package: udev
Followup-For: Bug #843160
Dear Maintainer,
I've got an unstable system (for dev/testing) in a VM running 686-pae and I'm
affected as well..
What's the simplest way to recover? I don't seem to end up on a recovery shell.
Gr,
Olaf
P: /devices/LNXSYSTM:00
E: DEVPATH=/devices/LNXSYST
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> lighttpd currently fails to build when using pbuilder. This is due
> to a missing automake build dependency.
Isn't automake part of autotools-dev?
There's a dep on autotools-dev
--
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff
wrote:
> Maybe we can switch to a FLOSS-friendly fork like mariadb after Wheezy
> release...
Postgres might be a better alternative.
--
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> [FAIL] Starting MySQL database server: mysqld . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> failed!
> Indeed, starting manually fails as well:
What do the logs (syslog etc) say?
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.deb
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> However it is also clear that an application with an embedded MySQL server,
> like amarok, should avoiding making use of system wide MySQL config files to
> insulate itself not just to changes in the Debian packaging but also
> changes tha
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Nicholas Bamber
wrote:
> Patrick,
> Some ideas. Not sure how the application works so not sure which is
> most liekly to be deoable.
>
> * There is a --default-storage-engine=type start up option. If you let the
> standard mysql scripts manage the mysqld p
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
>> Are you sure this is right?
>> Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found automatically?
>>
>> Olaf
>
>
> Normally yes, but I am pretty sure that the patch would not be backwards
> compatible.
What patch, exactly?
--
Olaf
--
To U
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Nicholas Bamber
wrote:
> Thomas,
> I attach a patch to enbale libdbi-drivers to build against the latest
Are you sure this is right?
Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found automatically?
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@li
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Moritz,
> The Debian MySQL team is debating pushing mysql 5.5 into unstable
> (including the latest upstream releases), transitioning the dependencies and
> dropping mysql 5.1. As such you probably won't see any activity on mysql
>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:59 PM, micah anderson wrote:
> I agree. However, the reality is that the security upgrade brought in
> unrelated changes to the security upgrade and caused unrelated software
> to break.
The problem is that Oracle does not release individual security
updates. So Debian c
On 28-3-2012 14:41, Andreas Ulm wrote:
IMO it's grave because a main functionality of mysql is that you can
write your own my.cnf and run mysql with your user.
But because of this bug you can't use mytop while running mysql as your
user.
At my company each developer has his/her own mysql daemon
Hi,
> Severity: grave
Why grave?
Mytop works fine for most users.
I'd suggest to downgrade this bug.
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Alexander Kurtz
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 18:24 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> So what's the advantage of c/sfdisk?
>
> Well, it's smaller, has fewer dependencies and is installed on almost
> every system. And since most admi
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Alexander Kurtz
wrote:
>> Isn't it kind of silly to have so many tools that try to do the same thing?
>
> GNU parted has way more features than {c,s,}fdisk will probably ever
> have; the most popular being perhaps support for a lot of different
> partition layouts
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Alexander Kurtz
wrote:
> That's hardly a bug:
True
> * If you delete something, data loss is the expected outcome.
True, but deleting and recreating was advised in a number of how to's.
> * If you want to do advanced operations like resizing a partiti
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:36:28AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors
>> wrote:
>> > Olaf van der Spek writes:
>> >> In that case it should be forwa
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors
wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek writes:
>> In that case it should be forwarded upstream.
>
> Sure, but I couldn't find the upstream BTS. I was just adding extra info
> to the bug report since I hit the same bug.
Let'
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors
wrote:
> if (last >= total_size) {
> *errmsg = _("Partition ends in the final partial cylinder");
> return -1;
> }
>
> and the check was added in
>
> commit 7eda085c41faa3445b4b168ce78ab18dab87d98a
> Author: Karel Zak
> Date: Thu Dec 7
| [Changing misc_word_char(X) into something which is still valid:]
Does it work if you don't change anything?
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> What's the real problem of a dangling alternative?
>
> I'm not sure exactly which section (probably 6.8) but this is or should
> be a policy violation.
Alternatives aren't mentioned in 6.8.
--
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-r
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> lighttpd split out the spawn-fcgi binary and manual page to spawn-fcgi
> but does not handle removal of the alternatives. As a result anyone
Would be nice if this was taken care of automatically (by dh, dpkg or
something else).
> upgrading from
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.17.2-9
Severity: serious
File: /sbin/fdisk
Justification: Near Data Loss
Hi,
I wanted to resize a partition, so I deleted it and recreated it (is there no
better way?). After this, the system no longer booted...
Turns out the old partition started at sector 63 and
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.17.2-9
Severity: serious
File: /sbin/cfdisk
Justification: Doesn't start
Hi,
Just installed Squeeze. cfdisk refuses to start: FATAL ERROR: Bad primary
partition 1: Partition ends in the final partial cylinder
fdisk says:
Disk /dev/sda: 17.2 GB, 17179869184 bytes
2
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>> These lines from this package's maintainer scripts suggest that it likely
>> is affected by the vulnerability:
>>
>> ---
>> chmod 640 $FRESHCLAMLOGFILE
>> chown "$d
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 08/26/2010 01:39 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>> The upload itself can probably be arranged one way or the other. Of more
>>> immediate concern would be if the release team would accept such an upload
>>&
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Will Boyd wrote:
> I am at something of a loss to diagnose or debug this, since the "FamErrlist"
> message is apparently harmless and no other information is forthcoming.
Try strace -s 80 lighttpd -D -f /etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf
Does cat /var/log/lighttpd/error
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> # killall apache2
> # dpkg --configure -a
> Setting up lighttpd (1.4.28-1) ...
> Starting web server: lighttpd.
> # echo $?
> 0
>
> I had uninstalled but not purged apache and clearly I do not know
> how to use netstat. :(
You're kidding me
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> net.ipv6.bindv6only = 1
>
> Wait, wasn't that changed back in netbase? Well, yes, for _new_
> installs, but this is a conffile so it keeps the existing value
> for existing installations.
That sucks, IMO it should've been set to 0 before
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> That are not your "changes".
I thought Mehdi wanted the contents.
> If you want, that your new build gets uploaded to Debian by a sponsor, you
> have to build and check your package+changes+diff and after that upload the
> whole to any sp
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 05:59 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> No upload yet?
>>
>> Waiting on someone with upload rights.
>>
>
> Do you have a .dsc r
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> No upload yet?
Waiting on someone with upload rights.
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> The upload itself can probably be arranged one way or the other. Of more
> immediate concern would be if the release team would accept such an upload
> into squeeze - if not it's probably better to also not put it into sid.
Hi release team,
The Lighttpd version in testing depends on ipv6only =
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>>> SVN contains a fixed version, 1.4.27. It can be uploaded, but it seems
>>> Eloy isn't around to do that.
>>
>> The upload itself can pro
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Martin Meredith wrote:
> On 16/06/10 16:54, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> Given that 2.1.0rc1 has been released, please package it.
>>
> An RC is not a stable release,
I know, but it's better than the current version.
> I'll consult
Given that 2.1.0rc1 has been released, please package it.
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: php5-xdebug
Version: 2.0.5-1+b1
Severity: grave
Hi,
Does the packaged version of xdebug support 5.3 at all? Mine just crashed and
upstream appears to say xdebug >= 2.1 is required for 5.3.
Olaf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
>
> Dne Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:39:17 +
> ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) napsal(a):
>
>> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
>> which was filed a
Package: php5-cgi
Version: 5.3.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Memory leaks might affect the entire system
Hi,
I'm not sure why php is using so much memory. The system has 8 gb real and 4 gb
swap and the OOM killer has been invoked several times already.
/etc/php5/cgi/php.ini:
memory_limit
Can't udev depend on the newer kernel required so it gets installed
automatically?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: samba
Version: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: IPv4 is kinda required
Hi,
Samba binds only to IPv6 and not to IPv4. I think this breaks stuff.
Greetings,
Olaf
$ sudo netstat -nlp
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address For
Package: lighttpd
Version: 1.4.25-1
Severity: critical
Hi,
http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-1987
doesn't appear to be fixed in unstable yet.
Olaf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'unstable'), (1, 'testing')
Architecture:
Looks like a dupe of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539479
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I installed a new server with Debian Lenny last week.
phpMyAdmin was working, now it's not.
Is pMA still vulnerable?
/var/lib/phpmyadmin# ls -l
total 8
-rw-r- 1 root www-data 60 2009-09-15 19:20 blowfish_secret.inc.php
-rw-rw 1 root www-data 635 2009-09-20 18:00 config.inc.php
# d
Your title and body don't seem consistent... Should it be with or
without 16?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Just wondering, why doesn't it depend on like libdb-dev >= 4.6?
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: lighttpd
Version: 1.4.23-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: 192.168.1.7
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1)
Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language:
Package: molly-guard
Followup-For: Bug #483822
And it appears to be fixed in testing:
debian:~# reboot
W: molly-guard: SSH session detected!
Please type in hostname of the machine to reboot:
Good thing I asked; I won't reboot debian ...
W: aborting reboot due to 30-query-hostname exiting with cod
Package: molly-guard
Version: 0.2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #483822
Hi,
On a fresh minimal Debian system, via SSH:
debian:~# reboot
molly-guard: SSH session detected!
Please type in hostname of the machine to reboot:
Good thing I asked; I won't reboot debian ...
debian:~# su - olaf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.06.17.1109 +0200]:
So this won't be fixed in stable?
No.
Doesn't that make this package fairly useless in stable?
It does not, for me. Your usage scenario is quite special, it seems.
You also di
So this won't be fixed in stable?
Doesn't that make this package fairly useless in stable?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> since mysql doesn't bother to fix this, maybe debian will, or at
least debian could not put affected mysql servers into stable
So Lenny should ship MySQL 4.1?
Or not ship MySQL at all?
That doesn't seem like an improvement over the current situation, as
many, many users are using MySQL and re
Hi,
What about stable?
Greetings,
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: netselect-apt
Version: 0.3.ds1-10
Followup-For: Bug #451889
Hi,
Etch is affected. It would be nice to get this fixed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux
On 7/27/07, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Urgency: low
Shouldn't updates containing security fixes be uploaded with a high(er) urgency?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lighttpd
Version: 1.4.15-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
Lighttpd 1.4.16 has been released and contains security fixes, see
http://www.lighttpd.net/2007/7/24/1-4-16-let-s-ship-it
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
AP
This is not a bug, it is because you have to #include
now that we used the headers officially exported by the linux tree, and
not linux-kernel-headers anymore.
Why doesn't the header include that file itself if it's always needed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=428368
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/17/07, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Package: sqwebmail
> Version: 0.53.3-5
> Followup-For: Bug #426330
>
> Hi,
>
> I reproduced this on a fresh Etch install, see below.
> However, I think this is a bug in Apach
Package: sqwebmail
Version: 0.53.3-5
Followup-For: Bug #426330
Hi,
I reproduced this on a fresh Etch install, see below.
However, I think this is a bug in Apache, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=415698
# ls -l /usr/lib/cgi-bin
ls: /usr/lib/cgi-bin: No such file or directory
Package: lighttpd
Followup-For: Bug #422254
Hi,
This bug doesn't look harmless. What is the reason it hasn't been fixed yet?
Olaf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6
> i think it's fairly common knowledge that this is to be expected when
installing mysql, as you will find this to be the case for every other
distribution of unix/linux that includes mysql.
Unfortunately, yes. It's also upstreams fault.
But why can't Debian do better?
A apt-get install mysql-se
Hi,
Cc: Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
I didn't receive your mail. :(
mysql -e 'update mysql.user set password=PASSWORD("foo") where user="root";
flush privileges;'
mysql -pfoo -e 'delete from mysql.user where user="root"
Package: mysql-server-5.0
Version: 5.0.38-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
Hi,
I pressed Enter when it asked for a new password for root (root already had a
password).
Three rows were inserted into mysql.user:
(0x6c6f63616c686f7374, 0x726f6f74, '', 'Y', 'Y',
rrors were encountered while processing:
apache2-common
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
--
Olaf van der Spek
http://xccu.sf.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Olaf van der Spek]
The quick way out fix doesn't appear to be safe. :(
Yes. Terribly sorry I did not discover its problem with removed but
not purged packages before uploading it. This script is safer:
for p in `dpkg -S /etc/init.d/*|cut -d: -f1|so
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:22 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely
Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Are you sure?
Yes:
It worked for me too today. But not yes
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely
Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Are you sure?
$ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. Thi
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
$ sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
So, it's the version 8.2 that failed to stop at this point.
dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
Stopping NTP server: ntpdinvoke-rc.d: initscript ntp-server, action "stop"
failed.
This is the new version of the prerm script, but not the new
Package: ntp-server
Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
The new version seems to have an issue with the init script too, although the
previous bugs have been closed.
$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tre
Package: python2.3
Version: 2.3.5-14
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Setting up python2.3 (2.3.5-14) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 1365, in ?
main()
File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 1359, in main
rv = action.run(globa
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=16218
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d=1
Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: The manual page at
http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Crashing.html contains
Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld[4151]: information that should help you find
out what is causing the crash.
Jan 1 14:19:59 xwis mysqld_safe[4218]: Number of processes running now: 0
Jan 1 14:1
r i've
> heard back from the first brave soul to test them out that there are
> no problems, i'll go ahead and send them to tpu if there are no
> objections.
It seems I've ran out of testing virtual machines and I'm away this
weekend. I'll not be able to test
sean finney wrote:
notfound 341705 5.0.16-1
thanks
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:32:58PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
If/when binutils gets fixed it's at least another 10 days.
What about testing-proposed-updates?
honestly, it's more work/time than i'm willing to give, and i
sean finney wrote:
hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:52:22PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
well, if you're not able/willing to try the version in unstable, then
i suggest that we do the following:
I can confirm that the linked reduced test case does not crash in
5.0.16-Debian_1.
ok
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
