Hi,
On 09/01/2017 01:41 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> since we got no answer, and this is blocking the gnat transition (one of the
> last blockers), I think
> we should bump severity and go ahead even without a maintainer answer (please
> followup, there is still
> time to address the issue
Hi Breno
On 07/26/2014 10:15 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On 07/24/2014 06:20 PM, Reto Buerki wrote:
>> On 07/24/2014 10:21 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
>>> This is a bug that is impacting ppc64el bootstrap also.
>>>
>>> My recomendantion is to keep just a b
On 07/24/2014 10:21 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> This is a bug that is impacting ppc64el bootstrap also.
>
> My recomendantion is to keep just a build-depend on gnat, unless you have
> strict
> dependency of version 4.6, which is not the case in 90% of the packages that
> depends on version 4.6
You
Hi,
On 01/29/2013 09:56 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> tags 699194 + pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for pcscada (versioned as 0.7.1-3.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Thanks for the NMU, but I already fixed
Hi,
On 02/19/2012 01:18 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> During the BSP in Paris at IRILL, I prepared an NMU for the pcscada
> package, versioned as 0.7.1-1.1. I did not upload it since I am a
> DM. The patch is attached.
Thanks for the patch. I already fixed this bug but did not have time to
uplo
Hi,
On 12/07/2011 05:28 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> * Reto Buerki [21 22:45]:
>
>>>> Thanks for preparing a NMU for pcscada. But this is not needed in this
>>>> case because I got the new PCSC/Ada version 0.7 almost ready for upload.
>>> C
On 11/21/2011 10:38 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Il 21/11/2011 22:20, Reto Buerki ha scritto:
>> Thanks for preparing a NMU for pcscada. But this is not needed in this
>> case because I got the new PCSC/Ada version 0.7 almost ready for upload.
>
> Cool! I've reschedule
Hi,
On 11/21/2011 10:03 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> tags 647796 + patch pending
> thanks
>
> I've prepared an NMU for pcscada (versioned as 0.6-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Thanks for preparing a NMU for pcscada. But this is not
Hi,
On 11/16/2011 11:55 AM, Didier Raboud wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for ahven (versioned as 2.1-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Thanks for preparing an NMU for ahven. But I think the better approach
would be for me to prepare a n
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 01/03/10 at 23:00 +0100, Reto Buerki wrote:
>> Is there a policy which defines the network setup and firewall rules for
>> an official build host? If every host is different, we better disable
>> the MIOP test because testing multicast functionality
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 28/02/10 at 14:02 +0100, Reto Buerki wrote:
>> The relevant part of the build log is:
>>
>>>> / Begin of Scenario CORBA_MIOP
>>>>
>>>> Scenario CORBA_MIOP
>>>> Description: CORBA/MIOP te
Hi,
The relevant part of the build log is:
>> / Begin of Scenario CORBA_MIOP
>>
>> Scenario CORBA_MIOP
>> Description: CORBA/MIOP test
>> Starting scenario CORBA_MIOP
>>
>> -- Begin of Test CORBA_MIOP_0
>>
>> Read : test CORBA_MIOP_0
>> Id : Simple test
>> Type: client_
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> The kfreebsd-i386 buildd, finzi.debian.org, had similar failures,
> this time the error message is:
>
> polyorb.utils.sockets: connect to 172.17.12.2 failed: [61] Connection
> refused
>
> (as opposed to 172.17.12.3 on fano.debian.org).
>
> Is it possible that these IP add
Ludovic Brenta schrieb:
> Some of the tests of 2.6.0~20090423-4 just failed on the kfreebsd-amd64
> buildd (they all passed in the previous build). Apparently all the test
> failures were due to:
>
> polyorb.utils.sockets: connect to 172.17.12.3 failed: [61] Connection
> refused
>
> The IP addre
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Should polyorb build-depend on Python? If so, why and which version of
> Python? Excerpt from the buildd log:
The support/reconfig script needs it to create the IDL tree accessors
for idlac.
- reto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Package: polyorb
> Version: 2.6.0~20090423-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64
>
> Excerpt from the buildd log:
>
> Running all 35 scenario files from:
> /build/buildd-polyorb_2.6.0~20090423-1-kfreebsd-amd64-XNmMrY/polyorb-2.6.0~20090423/testsui
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> I rebuilt polyorb in my i386 chroot (on a dual-core amd64 system) and
> the test suite passed, so I uploaded. I am not closing this bug yet
> because I want to understand the test failure; if this test depends on
> certain hardware or kernel versions to succeed, I want to k
17 matches
Mail list logo
