On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:54:41PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Package: hugs
> Version: 98.200609.21-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> This breaks compatibility with a ton of packages. I have tried to find
> this in some package, but can't. The lack of it means t
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:26:21AM +, Ross Paterson wrote:
> I know nothing of powerpc asm, but the GHC code is identical to the Hugs
> code except that it has "r" instead of "g":
>
> __asm__ volatile ("dcbf 0,%0\n\tsync\n\ticbi 0,%0"
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:37:25PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> The only non-standard thing I have in my environment that is related to
> gzip is this variable:
>
> GZIP=--best
OK, that's the problem. hugs98/debian/rules uses a variable GZIP,
and when you make it an environment variable, the
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:13:23PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> > hugs98 (98.200503.08-4) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* Added buid-depends on gzip (Closes: #336201).
>
> Thank you for this new version ! Unfortunately it does not fix my
> problem. In fact gzip was already installed on
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:56:50PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > That shouldn't be necessary -- all the locales in Debian agree with C
> > on ASCII-only text.
>
> Ah, that would be convenient. I've just done a quick test and they all
> seem OK except vi_VN.TCVN (both with latest CVS and the release
Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We're not sure the new hugs should go into sarge without matching new
> ghc/nhc98 due to library changes. We also need to check these changes
> don't cause any breakage elsewhere.
What incompatibilities with GHC 6.2 and nhc98 1.16 have you discovered
that w
6 matches
Mail list logo
