Bug#999526: Taking over package into Debian Python Team maintenance and fixing bug (Was: mdp: FTBFS with numpy 1.21 (in experimental): dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{versi

Hi Andreas, Thank you very much for offering help. I think Tiziano would not mind, so please feel very welcome to a) for the sake of b) or any other goodness you would like to bring ;) Note though that MDP is pretty much inactive project since a few years back. It seems it is still used by

Bug#1015102: heudiconv: FTBFS: FAILED heudiconv/tests/test_heuristics.py::test_reproin_largely_smoke[--files /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.10_heudiconv/build/heudiconv/tests/data-reproin]

oh, sorry about that and thanks for the ping! I fixed it upstream already (the bug is really in datalad), and will look to release it asap (i.e. now) and then see if we can update package (might need to also upload new version of dcmstack first) On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi

Bug#1009381: datalad-container: diff for NMU version 1.1.6-0.1

THANK YOU Adrian! Apparently I have forgotten to upload updated debian package after all those now automated bugfix releases in datalad-container... I will do that now, and if I fail -- your NMU would proudly solve the issue -- no need to cancel. On Thu, 26 May 2022, Adrian Bunk wrote: >

Bug#1010941: python-argcomplete salvaging and possible team (re)join

omplete (1.12.3-0.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * debian/rules +- provide workaround for tests to not fail (Closes: #1010941). + Upstream issue: https://github.com/kislyuk/argcomplete/issues/337 + + -- Yaroslav Halchenko Fri, 13 May 2022 13:07:30 -0400 +

Bug#1010941: FTBFS due to tests 56 tests failing

Package: python3-argcomplete Version: 1.12.3-0.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source Wanted to build a backport but failed to have it built even in current sid. A complete log is at http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/python-argcomplete_1.12.3-0.1_amd64.build and

Bug#937209: openopt: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

> openopt seems dead upstream and has been dropped from testing for almost > two years, let's remove it? sounds good to me -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 WWW:

Bug#982503: marked as pending in neurodebian

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #982503 in neurodebian reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#982503: marked as pending in neurodebian

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #982503 in neurodebian reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#982503: marked as pending in neurodebian

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #982503 in neurodebian reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#980967: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Yaroslav Halchenko ) (Bug#980967: fixed in bats 1.2.1-2)

On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Yaroslav, > On 15-02-2021 05:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > bats (1.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* debian/patches > > - adopted patch from https://github.com/bats-core/bats-core/pull/387 to > >resolve

Bug#978257: pynwb is marked for autoremoval from testing

failed to arrive with working minimal patch against that elderly 1.2.1 FWIW built current snapshot which seems to be ok. but I am reluctant to upload that one since it has breaking (we have no rev-depends though in debian ATM) changes. On Sun, 14 Feb 2021, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Yaroslav,

Bug#982120: heudiconv still depends on python

Thanks, on it. also needs a patch now for datalad 0.14 deprecation On Sat, 06 Feb 2021, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: heudiconv > Version: 0.9.0-1 > Severity: serious > This looks like a forgotten conversion: > https://sources.debian.org/src/heudiconv/0.9.0-1/debian/control/#L28 -- Yaroslav

Bug#982119: dcmstack: autopkgtest failure

Thanks! Test building and will upload if all good with $> git show commit e9f88704d2fd8bf5f0053904222e66dcc69db621 (HEAD -> debian, tag: debian/0.8-2) Author: Yaroslav Halchenko Date: Sat Feb 6 12:29:39 2021 -0500 Replace nosetests-3 with python3 -m nose for autopkgtest invo

Bug#975166: connectome-workbench: FTBFS: qwt_painter_command.h:85:22: error: field ‘clipPath’ has incomplete type ‘QPainterPath

Great, thanks for the info and the buzz -- missed this, will try now and upload if all good. Cheers, On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, s3v wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > I tried to build your package in a sid chroot environment > and I confirm that patch fixes this issue. > Kind Regards -- Yaroslav O.

Bug#932197: Bug#937144: Request to join the Neurodebian group

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > Thanks for the hint. While this could possibly speet up the upload of > > nipype I for myself are fine with waiting for the new Build-Depends. > > Anybody who wants to speed up things is kindly invited to add this patch > > and upload. >

Bug#959138: Error in build time tests (Was: numpy breaks nipy autopkgtest: No module named 'numpy.testing.decorators')

FWIW those were reported "upstream" https://github.com/nipy/nipy/issues/466 unfortunately I had no time to look at them (again :-/) On Tue, 08 Dec 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 pending > Control: tags -1 help > Hi, > I've updated nipy Git[1] to version 0.4.3~rc1 which solves

Bug#976325: [ans...@debian.org: Bug#976325: src:libgdf: invalid maintainer address]

On Thu, 03 Dec 2020, Rafael Laboissière wrote: > Dear Yaroslav and Michael, > Are you aware of the problem related in Bug#976325, regarding the email > address t...@neuro.debian.net? thanks Rafael. I think that elderly mail server didn't re-emerge from the dead upon recent power outage. I

Bug#972163: Bug#972166: Rising severities

Feel welcome to NMU without delay. Sorry for being slow etc. Thank you! On Sun, 25 Oct 2020, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > severity 972163 serious > severity 972166 serious > block 972176 by 972163 > block 972176 by 972166 > thanks > Hi! We are close to begin the Qt transition

Bug#964650: pydicom: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13

On Fri, 17 Jul 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 help > Hi, > the new upstream version I've just pushed to git solves the issue thanks! > that is reported here, but I'm running into a different issue: >TypeError: data type 'uint15' not understood I do not understand it

Bug#938605: svgtune: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 938605

Old python ones are listed only as alternative dependencies to easy backports for ancient systems. https://packages.debian.org/sid/svgtune I don't think this package holds any python removal On June 20, 2020 12:49:59 AM EDT, Sandro Tosi wrote: >Control: reopen -1 > >This bug was closed, but

Bug#937485: pymvpa2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

As the upstream and Debian maintainer for it, I am ok with it. It could be easily made to build for python 3 but tests would show that it is not entirely kosher. I better reupload it when it i an sure it is functioning correctly again On June 13, 2020 1:16:58 PM EDT, "Moritz Mühlenhoff" wrote:

Bug#945739: symeig - RM?

all' instead of 'any' * Boosted policy to 3.8.3: - -dbg got correct "section: debug" and "priority: extra" -- Yaroslav Halchenko Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:55:44 -0500 so indeed it is time for it to RiP ;) please RM On Wed, 13 May 2020, Sco

Bug#959940: hdmf FTBFS with h5py 2.10.0

Package: python3-h5py Version: 2.10.0-7 Followup-For: Bug #959940 Please see https://github.com/hdmf-dev/hdmf/issues/343#issuecomment-625972582 for possibly more info: @tillea @yarikoptic the debian port contains this code in h5py_2.10.0-7.debian/debian/wrapper_module/h5py/__init__.py

Bug#959575: marked as pending in neurodebian

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #959575 in neurodebian reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#959575: neurodebian: FTBFS: (process:15028): WARNING **: 05:07:11.653: Unable to create profile directory (Permission denied) (13)

On Sun, 03 May 2020, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > [ ! -d build/icons ] && mkdir -p build/icons > > inkscape artwork/icon.svg -w 32 -h 32 \ > > -e build/icons/neurodebian.png > > ** (process:15028): WARNING **: 05:07:11.653: Unable to create profile > > directory (Permission denied) (13) > >

Bug#937431: pyepl: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

> > yes, AFAIK it is dead. Let's RM. you ? me ? ;) > Please go ahead :-) FTR #959213 -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834

Bug#932197: Bug#937144: Request to join the Neurodebian group

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 04:15:03PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:37:30AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > thank you Andreas!!! > > > re etelemetry: I made it optional for previous v

Bug#937431: pyepl: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:33:35AM +, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: src:pyepl > > Version: 1.1.0+git12-g365f8e3-3 > > Severity: normal > > Tags: sid bullseye > > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: py2removal > > Python2

Bug#936857: libfreenect: diff for version 1:0.5.3-2

Thanks for the alert, FWIW, done now: (git)lena:~exppsy/libfreenect[debian]git $> gbp push salsa gbp:info: Pushing debian/1%0.5.3-1 to salsa gbp:info: Pushing upstream/0.5.3 to salsa gbp:info: Pushing refs/heads/debian to salsa:refs/heads/debian gbp:info: Pushing refs/heads/dfsg to

Bug#936857: libfreenect: diff for version 1:0.5.3-2

On Thu, 09 Apr 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Control: tags 936857 + patch > Dear maintainer, > I've prepared an upload for libfreenect (versioned as 1:0.5.3-2). The diff > is attached to this message. Thank you Sandro! -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience

Bug#954579: datalad-container: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: datalad (>= 0.11.5~)

On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: datalad-container > Version: 0.5.0-1 Thank you for the report. 1.0.0-1 was built but forgotten to be uploaded at the end of Feb. Now it would need to wait until datalad 0.12.4 is uploaded first which would resolve incompatibilities with

Bug#942615: no-changes source-only NMU

On Fri, 06 Mar 2020, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 pending > Dear maintainer, > I have uploaded a no-changes source only version to DELAYED/15. Please > tell me if I should delay or cancel the upload. oh, I have missed that https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942615 and

Bug#951982: fixed upstream

FWIW, this issue should be fully addressed in recent releases. in Debian we have 4.30.0-1, upstream release is v4.43.0, and this issue was fixed in https://github.com/tqdm/tqdm/commit/0fcf9ed4c191fa224afd5581ac1a47b2cf80bc54#diff-79a0b30dff238cd3aa6b9f8e665a57a0 pandas: support v1.0.0 (so even

Bug#932197: Bug#937144: Request to join the Neurodebian group

thank you Andreas!!! re etelemetry: I made it optional for previous version of the package: $> quilt series deb-no-demand-on-etelemetry $> git describe debian/0.6.0-1 On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > here is some update I'm also forwarding

Bug#937249: closed by Abhijith PA (Bug#937249: fixed in patool 1.12-4)

On Thu, 06 Feb 2020, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, Abhijith PA wrote: > > Hi Adrian, > > On 15/01/20 5:47 pm, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 03:21:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System > > > wrote: > > >> ... &

Bug#936305: marked as pending in citeproc-py

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #936305 in citeproc-py reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#937249: closed by Abhijith PA (Bug#937249: fixed in patool 1.12-4)

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, Abhijith PA wrote: > Hi Adrian, > On 15/01/20 5:47 pm, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 03:21:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >> ... > >> Architecture: source all > >> Version: 1.12-4 > >> ... > > Please make a source-only upload to allow

Bug#936857: libfreenect: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

On Mon, 27 Jan 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote: > in the archive we have 0.5.3, released in 2015; the latest upstream > release is 0.5.7 which was released in 2017; the first release to > support python3 is 0.5.4 of 2016. > I see 2 paths forward: > 1. (longer) the package gets upgraded to 0.5.7 (with

Bug#948372: Please push your changes to nibabel

On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 01:01:00PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > I'm fine with re-doing what I changed if you consider it really of > > > practical relevance. If you ask me we two would spent time we could > &

Bug#948372: Please push your changes to nibabel

On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > > so I should be able to transfer over to debian-med. May be rename yours > > into nibabel-med-initial so I could do it? > I'm fine with re-doing what I changed if you consider it really of > practical relevance. If you ask me we two would spent

Bug#948372: Please push your changes to nibabel

On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Yaroslav, > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:50:07AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > I think it would be helpful if you would remove the old repository > > > in neurodebian-team. > > shouldn't I (you) just "

Bug#948372: Please push your changes to nibabel

On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Yaroslav, > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 02:41:52PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > actually as far as I see it Sando has pushed everything for > > 2.5.1-2 > > https://salsa.debian.org/neurodebian-team/nibabel/blob/d

Bug#948372: Please push your changes to nibabel

On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Yaroslav, > can you please push your latest changes to nibabel? I'd volunteer > to fix #948372 and when doing so move the repository to Debian Med > if you do not mind. actually as far as I see it Sando has pushed everything for 2.5.1-2

Bug#929954: [Python-apps-team] Bug#929954: what about just uploading relevant patch for now?

On Fri, 09 Aug 2019, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > If new version building is problematic, why not to upload just a patched > > version? > That would only delay the removal a bit: I'm sure that the current > version doesn't work with p

Bug#936450: duecredit: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

thanks! fixing now On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Followup-For: Bug #936450 > Control: found -1 0.7.0-2 > There are some references to python2 left, causing the package to FTBFS: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=duecredit=all=0.7.0-2=1576039796=0 > fakeroot

Bug#913015: Bug#936372: dcmstack: diff for version 0.7-2

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Control: tags 913015 + patch > Control: tags 936372 + patch > Control: tags 942992 + patch > Dear maintainer, > I've prepared an upload for dcmstack (versioned as 0.7-2). The diff > is attached to this message. > i dont have access to the GH repos,

Bug#945348: python3-joblib: Missing new dependency python3-pkg-resources

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > Package: python3-joblib > Version: 0.14.0-0.2 > Severity: critical > Tags: patch > Justification: breaks unrelated software > Hi, > as per latest debci log of spades[1] joblib needs python3--pkg-resources. > I will add this to the dependencies but

Bug#934868: pynwb: Please drop python2 support

On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, peter green wrote: > severity 934868 serious > thanks > python-pynwb depends on python-h5py, which is no longer built by the h5py > source package. > unfortunately it seems hdmf is still stuck in new, can you go ahead with > uploading the python2 removal with the

Bug#903213: fixed in datalad 0.10.2-1

On Tue, 06 Aug 2019, Santiago Vila wrote: > reopen 903213 > found 903213 0.4.1-1 > fixed 903213 0.10.2-1 > thanks > Hi. Could we please fix this in stretch? > (Packages in stretch must be buildable in stretch). ... FAILED (SKIP=65, errors=63, failures=15) I will unlikely embark on that

Bug#941242: pymc: intention to remove this package from Debian

I guess it could indeed be removed, even if only to raise later from ashes as pymc3 Cheers On September 26, 2019 7:18:08 PM EDT, Sandro Tosi wrote: >Source: pymc >Severity: serious > >Hello, >pymc is abandoned upstream and replaced by pymc3 (python3 only module),

Bug#934687: Bug#938974: Removed package(s) from unstable

On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Version: 0.5.3-1+rm oh well -- I have missed all the reports (misconfigured debian.net MX for a few months, heh). So only saw the effect of RM. Just want to clarify heudiconv is maintained python3 support was added upstream as of 0.3 I

Bug#935015: Thank you!

Dear Sandro, Steve, and Peter Thank you for all the modernization of DataLad package. Feel welcome to upload to shorter NMU if desired/needed. Some of those changes are now addressed upstream and I will include/ack your NMUs with the next release of datalad package. Cheers, -- Yaroslav O.

Bug#929954: what about just uploading relevant patch for now?

Package: rst2pdf Version: 0.93-7 Followup-For: Bug #929954 If new version building is problematic, why not to upload just a patched version? I have verified that adding import reportlab to /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/rst2pdf/flowables.py addresses the issue I ran into this one while

Bug#926930: joblib: FTBFS (test_nested_parallelism_limit does not always work)

TL;DR summary: interesting... in my case reliably fails locally on python 3.6 and 3.7 but not 2.7 even with fresh release of 0.13.0 reported upstream https://github.com/joblib/joblib/issues/870 Thanks for the patch -- I will xfail it in 0.13.0-1 with this, upload to unstable, and then upload

Bug#918206: Pandas

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > Dear Rebecca, > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 07:25:26AM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > > On 27/02/2019 07:00, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Dear Rebecca, > > > I do not think that there is any > > > need for a separate branch. Just stick to the debian

Bug#917740: not about CHANGES

upstream shortly - so we will see if reproduces then On Sun, 03 Feb 2019, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > CHANGES error is benign , will clarify upstream > https://github.com/nipy/nipype/issues/2873 > the actual issue is > > raise TypeError("expected str, bytes o

Bug#917740: not about CHANGES

CHANGES error is benign , will clarify upstream https://github.com/nipy/nipype/issues/2873 the actual issue is > raise TypeError("expected str, bytes or os.PathLike object, " > > "not " + path_type.__name__) > E TypeError: expected

Bug#919727: cmtk /dcmtk

On Mon, 21 Jan 2019, Torsten Rohlfing wrote: >Hi there - >Upstream owner of CMTK here. It looks like DCMTK in release 3.6.4 changed >their API for locking/unlocking the global data dictionary. >I am going to look into fixing this, but it'll take a while since I'll >have to

Bug#896025: Segfault in test suite of new upstream version (Was: python-mne FTBFS with python-matplotlib 2.2.2-1)

Dear Andreas Thank you for taking a stab at this! I will try to not forget to look at it tomorrow (need to meet some other deadlines today). If you had a chance to try figuring out in what part segfault happens (I would just strace -f -o /tmp/strace.log python -m pytest ...) it might give a

Bug#911830: FTBFS on multiple architectures

Dear Yangfl and other Debian-science folks could you please have a look at the scikit-learn packaging, which was heavily tuned up recently and I have little to no clue how to augment it reliably back or to avoid parallel build and its gotchas. See http://bugs.debian.org/911830 for more details

Bug#911830: FTBFS on multiple architectures

Great, thanks For starters I would just disable parallel invocation of debian/rules since indeed there is no guarantee of absent races. Will do and reupload when get back from dentist ;-) -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko (mobile version) Center for Open Neuroscience

Bug#911830: FTBFS on multiple architectures

On Sun, 02 Dec 2018, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > There's no visible progress on this problem in git -- is there progress > > elsewhere? > you could find some traces of the progress which lead to i386 fixes on > https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues?utf8=%E

Bug#911830: FTBFS on multiple architectures

On Sun, 02 Dec 2018, Stuart Prescott wrote: > Dear Yaroslav & Michael, > scikit-learn currently FTBFS everywhere. please define your version of "everywhere". From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=scikit-learn=unstable I see that 0.20.1+dfsg-1 builds fine on all intel and mips

Bug#908555: Bug #908555 in pydicom marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #908555 in pydicom reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#907335: similar issue

thanks! upstream says the issue was fixed in https://github.com/pydata/patsy/pull/131 so I will just build a fresh snapshot Cheers! On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Julian Taylor wrote: > this problem probably has the same python change as cause as this issue: >

Bug#909990: Stange import error for nibabel when trying to import from .pybuild

Thank you Andreas for looking into it 2.3.1 bugfix is around the corner https://github.com/nipy/nibabel/pull/667 so I will aim to make sure the #909990 is fixed within it (for starters - I do not think I observed this exception when building from current RC branch) On Mon, 08 Oct 2018,

Bug#906388: nipy: FTBFS in buster/sid (failing tests)

update: - uploaded sympy 1.3 which resolves sympy bug - running by upstream the resolution for the other failed test: https://github.com/nipy/nipy/pull/445 and will upload fixed up package tomorrow On Tue, 02 Oct 2018, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > FWIW, two of the errors are caused by a

Bug#906388: nipy: FTBFS in buster/sid (failing tests)

FWIW, two of the errors are caused by a bug in sympy which was fixed in 1.3 . I am preparing sympy 1.3 although didn't check yet if it would fix it in nipy tests (not clear why it wasn't triggered before) On Fri, 17 Aug 2018, Santiago Vila wrote: > Package: src:nipy > Version: 0.4.2-1 >

Bug#907806: How to disable tests for Python2 only?

On Mon, 01 Oct 2018, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Yaroslav, > was this helpful for you? sorry -- didn't look into scikit-learn yet. BTW - 0.20 release was posted, so we should update and try again. Will you have time or should I ? -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience

Bug#866455: Bug #866455 in psychopy marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #866455 in psychopy reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#907806: How to disable tests for Python2 only?

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Andreas Tille wrote: > Probably due to racing condition since I migrated the repository before > your pushes. > > > either needed to be imported as quilt patches or alternatively you can > > > use git mode in d/watch which creates a new tarball for you > > > incorporating

Bug#907806: How to disable tests for Python2 only?

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > When you talked about new upstream version: Do you want to give 0.20rc1 > > I did give it a try... > > From the now empty list of > > https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/created_by/yarikoptic it > > might be that all of the ones

Bug#902817: fail2ban: diff for NMU version 0.10.2-2.1

On Sun, 23 Sep 2018, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Control: tags 902817 + patch > Control: tags 902817 + pending > Dear maintainer, > I've prepared an NMU for fail2ban (versioned as 0.10.2-2.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. I guess if

Bug#907806: How to disable tests for Python2 only?

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Andreas Tille wrote: > When you talked about new upstream version: Do you want to give 0.20rc1 I did give it a try... From the now empty list of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/created_by/yarikoptic it might be that all of the ones I've filed are

Bug#907806: How to disable tests for Python2 only?

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:54:02AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > Outstanding few issues so far are reported/dealt with upstream: > > https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+author%3Ayarikoptic+

Bug#907806: How to disable tests for Python2 only?

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 04:33:21PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > looking at the bug log of scikit-learn[1] it seems to be a simple means to > > do > > --- a/debian/control > > +++ b/debian/control > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ Build-Depends:

Bug#907806: scikit-learn: FTBFS in buster/sid (could not import 'distributed')

FWIW - waiting on upstream to fixup issues I've reported leading to FTBFS of 0.20rc: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+author%3Ayarikoptic+label%3ABlocker when done, will upload the 0.20 to address this one On Sun, 02 Sep 2018, Santiago Vila wrote: >

Bug#904359: pending

Tags +pending Sorry I caused us duplicate work. for a minor slip it wasn't uploaded to debian proper, I will build (now) and upload tomorrow morning cheers, -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman

Bug#903213: datalad: FTBFS in stretch/buster/sid

Should be fixable, concerns only testing On July 8, 2018 9:02:07 AM EDT, Sean Whitton wrote: >Hello Santiago, > >On Sat, Jul 07 2018, Santiago Vila wrote: > >> This is just how the build ends in my autobuilder with >dpkg-buildpackage -A, >> but there are full build logs available here: >> >>

Bug#903213: datalad: FTBFS in stretch/buster/sid

I bet it is the security fix which was recently introduced... Would need a patch to datalad from https://github.com/datalad/datalad/pull/2670 Hopefully still easy to apply since datalad moved way far ahead since 0.4 . For buster/sid we will just release fresh version soon which would be

Bug#901377: ping (was: Re: skimage: FTBFS and Debci failure with NumPy 1.14)

FWIW -- about to upload, cosmetics now On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 25 June 2018 at 18:21, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > I am loosely involved and highly interested ;-) If someone could help > > maintaining it, I would appreciate. > > meanwhile sinc

Bug#901377: ping (was: Re: skimage: FTBFS and Debci failure with NumPy 1.14)

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 25 June 2018 at 18:21, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > I am loosely involved and highly interested ;-) If someone could help > > maintaining it, I would appreciate. > > meanwhile since there were no other activity re

Bug#901377: ping (was: Re: skimage: FTBFS and Debci failure with NumPy 1.14)

On Sat, 23 Jun 2018, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Stefan, Yaroslav > On 22 June 2018 at 21:15, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > > That sounds like a good solution to me. That said, scikit-image in > > Debian is now maintained by the science team, so it would be good to > > hear from a member of that

Bug#902302: connectome-workbench FTBFS on armel/armhf: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef khronos_ssize_t GLsizeiptr'

Thank you Adrian Yes, we will proceed the RM way, will deal with it tomorrow Cheers On June 24, 2018 2:30:35 PM EDT, Adrian Bunk wrote: >Source: connectome-workbench >Version: 1.3.1-1 >Severity: serious > >https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=connectome-workbench=sid > >... >In file

Bug#902258: any docker command triggers an attempt to unlock my GPG key

Package: docker.io Version: 18.03.1+dfsg1-3 Severity: grave Filing an official report so it doesn't get forgotten (we had some private correspondence about it). New behavior was detected while testing new version in experimental (17.12.1+dfsg-2) and maintains with current one: running any

Bug#895226: FTBFS on amd64 in testing/unstable - a number of tests failures

Package: python-cffi Version: 1.11.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) testing/cffi0/test_verify.py ..s [ 35%] [ 39%]

Bug#894526: Taking over scikit-learn into Debian Science team maintenance

meanwhile may be let me just take care about this tiny issue myself On Sun, 08 Apr 2018, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Ok. Go ahead. Thanks. > But indeed please keep it in a shape so it could be easily backported. > On April 8, 2018 1:59:53 AM EDT, Andreas Tille <andr...@fam-til

Bug#894526: Taking over scikit-learn into Debian Science team maintenance

Ok. Go ahead. Thanks. But indeed please keep it in a shape so it could be easily backported. On April 8, 2018 1:59:53 AM EDT, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Yaroslav and Michael, > >as I did in the past with other scientific packages I would like to >take >over scikit-learn into

Bug#866433: impressive: diff for NMU version 0.11.2-1.1

Feel welcome to upload without delays On February 3, 2018 7:47:15 AM EST, Adrian Bunk wrote: >Control: tags 866433 + patch >Control: tags 866433 + pending > >Dear maintainer, > >I've prepared an NMU for impressive (versioned as 0.11.2-1.1) and >uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please

Bug#880793: closed by Yaroslav Halchenko <deb...@onerussian.com> (Bug#880793: fixed in pymvpa2 2.6.4-1)

On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Control: reopen -1 > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 03:39:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > >... > > > pymvpa2 (2.6.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#880793: closed by Yaroslav Halchenko <deb...@onerussian.com> (Bug#880793: fixed in pymvpa2 2.6.4-1)

On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Control: reopen -1 > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 03:39:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > >... > > > pymvpa2 (2.6.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#880793: closed by Yaroslav Halchenko <deb...@onerussian.com> (Bug#880793: fixed in pymvpa2 2.6.4-1)

On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 03:39:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >... > > pymvpa2 (2.6.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium > >... > >* debian/rules > > - run tests under fixed MVPA_SEED=1 to avoid surprises, so

Bug#867550: libgiftiio-dev: This package should have a strong dependance on libnifti-dev

severity 867550 normal thanks On Fri, 07 Jul 2017, Manonam wrote: > Package: libgiftiio-dev > Version: 1.0.9-1+b2 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Sorry for a delayed reply. As far as I see - it builds fine for me in a clean

Bug#866458: Please update Git repository mentioned in VCS fields

On Sat, 20 Jan 2018, Andreas Tille wrote: > Could you please bring the Git repository in sync to enable me to make > a proper team upload instead of putting the work to inject a NMU into > the repository for something that is so simple that if it would be less > work if you do it yourself.

Bug#866446: Where is an up to date Git for openpyxl (Was: What branch of the git repository is featuring the latest packaging)

Regarding the original report: $> grep python-pil debian/control python-pytest, python-pil | python-imaging, Recommends: python-pytest, python-pil, python-imaging so the only "harm" here is a possible recommends of python-imaging. IMHO severity is exaggerated. Anyways, I will

Bug#853492: libgdf: ftbfs with GCC-7

Thanks! On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Juhani Numminen wrote: > Control: tags -1 + patch > This patch removes -Werror to resolve this FTBFS. Removing the deprecated > exception specifications is another option but I didn't feel like editing > the public headers of the library. -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko

Bug#883466: singularity-container: FTBFS on mips*

Thanks -- I have submitted them for upstream review/feedback https://github.com/singularityware/singularity/pull/1195 On Mon, 04 Dec 2017, James Cowgill wrote: > Source: singularity-container > Version: 2.4-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid buster patch > Hi, > singularity-container FTBFS on

Bug#877344: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#877344: Bug#877344: python-mne FTBFS: ERROR: Test ICA on raw and epochs

On Mon, 04 Dec 2017, Alexandre Gramfort wrote: >oh mayavi >I would really be in favor of removing mayavi as a hard dependency. >is it an option? well, it is not a hard dependency already... I just hate when users keep reporting all those and then I need to react. Prefer not to

Bug#877344: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#877344: python-mne FTBFS: ERROR: Test ICA on raw and epochs

On Mon, 04 Dec 2017, Alexandre Gramfort wrote: >Hi Andreas, >I don't have the bandwidth to address this sorry. >Also mne 0.13 is now 2 versions behind where we are now. >Nobody found the time to do the debian packaging for 0.14 >and 0.15 so far. >Really sorry about this.

Bug#877344: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#877344: python-mne FTBFS: ERROR: Test ICA on raw and epochs

I will look into updating it in upcoming days On December 4, 2017 8:54:28 AM EST, Alexandre Gramfort wrote: >Hi Andreas, > >I don't have the bandwidth to address this sorry. > >Also mne 0.13 is now 2 versions behind where we are now. >Nobody found the time to do the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >