Bug#622343: Return xpdf-utils to Debian

2011-04-12 Thread Yitzchak Gale
Package: xpdf-utils Version: 3.02-12 Severity: grave xpdf as a rendering library was removed from Debian, with the justification that a fork of this library, poppler, could be used instead. However, the command-line utilities in poppler-utils are significantly different than those of xpdf and

Bug#547944: still unbootable

2009-10-06 Thread Yitzchak Gale
OK, I've gotten myself out of my predicament. In a root shell launched using the Debian Lenny installation disk Rescue Mode, I re-installed grub-pc (because I had previously tried to recover by downgrading to grub-legacy), then I typed the following sequence of commands: mv /boot/grub

Bug#547944: Still unbootable

2009-10-04 Thread Yitzchak Gale
After running upgrade-from-grub-legacy, my system is unbootable. I don't recall whether I saw such a checkbox, or if I did, whether I checked it. So I am replying to this bug rather than opening a new one on the chance that this is the same issue. I tried reconfiguring grub-pc, reinstalling

Bug#432755: Flashplugin-nonfree: md5sum mismatch found in version 9.0.48.0.3

2007-12-09 Thread Yitzchak Gale
Yes, the Adobe download page at: http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlashP2_Platform=Linux reports that version 9,0,115,0 of Adobe Flash Player for Linux was posted on 2007-12-03. So we need yet another urgent upgrade of the Debian package. This is

Bug#402753: lilypond-doc : there is no HTML documentation at all

2007-02-08 Thread Yitzchak Gale
Frank Küster wrote: Well, there are still the info files. Whether it is grave or important to not include the html docs, this I leave to the maintainer. Never mind, let's fix it! However, the bug can be fixed by adding rsync to Build-Depends-Indep. At least this helped when I tried in a

Bug#405386: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#405386: digikam: moving items loses tag and rating data in 0.9.0-beta3

2007-01-04 Thread Yitzchak Gale
Is there a version of digikamimageplugins that can be used with digikam 0.9.0 and libexiv2-0.12? We are keeping in front of you but only just. :-) Thanks. I know that maintaining a package with so many dependencies is a challenge. But when you are successful, that is where Debian provides

Bug#405386: digikam: moving items loses tag and rating data in 0.9.0-beta3

2007-01-03 Thread Yitzchak Gale
As a heavy users of digicam (actually my kids, not me, anyway...), we would lose a LOT more data from digicam being removed from etch than from this bug. It would be nice if 0.9.0-final could make it into etch, but I have my doubts that it is possible at this point. So I urgently request that

Bug#405386: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#405386: digikam: moving items loses tag and rating data in 0.9.0-beta3

2007-01-03 Thread Yitzchak Gale
Mark Purcell wrote: ...we are going to... revert digikam in etch to 0.8.2 due to a library transition for libexiv2... digikam 0.9.0 (final) is currently available in the experimental distribution. I would suggest that you both upgrade to 0.9.0 and advise if this issue is still a problem. Where

Bug#405386: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#405386: digikam: moving items loses tag and rating data in 0.9.0-beta3

2007-01-03 Thread Yitzchak Gale
digikam 0.9.0 (final) is currently available in the experimental distribution. I would suggest that you both upgrade to 0.9.0 and advise if this issue is still a problem Is there a version of digikamimageplugins that can be used with digikam 0.9.0 and libexiv2-0.12? Thanks, Yitz -- To

Bug#397006: Python 2.5 still broken on testing

2006-11-05 Thread Yitzchak Gale
On testing, that work-around is not possible - 70 dependencies prevent upgrading python2.4-minimal to 2.4.4-1. So python2.5 still cannot install on testing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]