Bug#482053: xfsprogs: xfs_growfs will create unmountable filesystem on 32bit OS

2008-05-20 Thread nscott
Package: xfsprogs Version: 2.8.11-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system XFS on 32bit Linux cannot mount filesystems 16T see: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00124.html xfs_grow will grow a filsystem larger than this which will function untill the system

Bug#480141: Fails to build with gcc-4.3

2008-05-08 Thread nscott
Hi Riki, curve.cpp: In static member function 'static double Curve::NaN()': curve.cpp:35: error: 'numeric_limits' is not a member of 'std' curve.cpp:35: error: expected primary-expression before 'double' curve.cpp:35: error: expected ';' before 'double' curve.cpp:35: error: expected

Bug#479687: fix for 479687

2008-05-06 Thread nscott
tags 479687 +patch thanks adding pcp, libglu1-mesa-dev andmesa-common-dev to the build-dependencies will make this build (at least on i386 and amd64, I don't have any other platforms handy to test). Thanks Peter. The pcp dependency is not right - thats a packaging issue in PCP, which I

Bug#470326: pcp: FTBFS: checking for ps style... unknown

2008-03-11 Thread nscott
On 11/03/08 at 10:55 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: Can you confirm that procps was _not_ installed in the build chroot for me please? If it is, can you mail me the output from ps -ef on a build system? procps was not installed (it's not an essential or build-essential package), it's only

Bug#465733: Updating bug status

2008-02-29 Thread nscott
Hi, Just a quick note to say I'll be downgrading the severity on this bug - as per the previous email on the bug, xfs_repair can fix the FS damage. In the long run, theres also discussion (upstream) of replacing xfs_check entirely by an xfs_repair -n wrapper, which would resolve this issue

Bug#465733: xfsprogs: xfs_check SEGV

2008-02-15 Thread nscott
On Friday 15 February 2008 09:16, Nathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 22:42 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: Package: xfsprogs Version: 2.8.11-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Heh, er, just a tad extreme? (its not clear how an xfs_check