close 1084993 26.1.5+dfsg1-2
thanks
close 1077435 0.6.0~dfsg-3
thanks
hi,
Le lun. 31 juil. 2023 à 08:27, Kunal Mehta a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> On 7/29/23 16:44, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > resources/lib/
> > (https://sources.debian.org/src/mediawiki/1:1.39.4-2/resources/lib/)
> >
> > include a few library already packaged for debian.
> >
> > Mo
Hi Paul,
It is a regression on qemu. I will disable the test but I will prefer
qemu fixed.
I could not reproduce on porter box, I get another qemu bug...
Who is the specialist of qemu ?
Bastien
Le mer. 19 juil. 2023 à 10:45, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>
> Source: isa-support
> Version: 15.1
> Seve
Le lun. 26 juin 2023 à 14:16, David Bremner a écrit :
>
> roucaries bastien writes:
> >
> > Yes in your case i cheched by grepping thé build log. Lua ils compiléd what
> > why i set rc severity.
>
> I suspect that you saw a different package with Lua in the name, na
Le lun. 26 juin 2023 à 06:45, David Bremner a écrit :
> Bastien Roucariès writes:
>
> > Source: darktable
> > Version: Use packaged lua
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: embded code copy
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > It appear that your package embded and compile lua
> >
> > Could you:
Control: tags 964198 + patch
Control: tags 964198 + pending
Control: tags 978220 + patch
Control: tags 978220 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for hylafax (versioned as 3:6.0.7-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
d
close 939391 6.5.1~dfsg-1
thanks
close 939391 6.5.1~dfsg-1
thanks
Fixed uploaded.
BTW this package is a security trap.
I plan to open a few CVEs.
Did you have wrd karaoke file ? I plan to drop this feature if i could not test
bastien
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:53:05PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>>
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:47 PM, wrote:
> Package: libmagick++-6.q16-7
> Version: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid buster
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: gcc-7-op-mangling
>
I need a change that break ABI, I will release a new version. Does it
exist in this case a
I can do it but I do not know that is the best:
- let 1.6 go to unstable
- patch old version
Could you ask release team.
The debdiff between the two version is so small that I have doubt
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> If you would like me to prepare an upl
control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/crypto-browserify/diffie-hellman/issues/22
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Source: node-diffie-hellman
> Version: 5.0.2-1
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-CC: Bastien Roucariès
>
> Hi,
>
> I just ACCEPTed node-diffie-hellman from NEW
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1334543
> Control: forwarded 849832 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1334543
>
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 22:52:08 +0100 Bastien ROUCARIES
> wrote:
>> severit
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> control: tag -1 unreproducible
>
> Good evening.
>
> In my linux/amd64 sbuild setup, dx builds just fine.
>
> What had me puzzled, though, is how the message "checking architecture
> type... amd64" came to be. If uname works correctly, the st
BTW feel free to NMU imagemagick during a short break I take in the
next two days.
Bastien
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:22 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:29 PM, roucaries bastien
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:28 PM, roucaries bastien
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
>>> wrot
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:29 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:28 PM, roucaries bastien
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/12/16 22:37, roucaries bastien wrote:
>>>> control: forw
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 09/12/16 22:37, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/320
>>
>> Dear realease team,
>>
>> What is the next step?
>
> In whi
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:28 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> On 09/12/16 22:37, roucaries bastien wrote:
>>> control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/320
>>>
>>&
an ABI break.
>
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 at 15:55:02 +0100, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> * struct _DrawInfo (1) is not a problem from a C point of view because
>> it should be set and destry by API function. It is a opaque object. So
>> no need to so bump for this
>> * _ElementR
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> I'm unsure this makes sense to have a big bugreport collecting
> various issues. Can this be split in the various isolated issues?
> Otherwise it is untrackable.
>
> I for now have removed the entry from the security-t
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:52 AM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
>>
>> What a mess.
>
> I can only agree...
>
>> Preparing to unpack .../libmagickwand-6.q16-2_8%3a6.9.2.10+dfsg-2_i386.deb
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:52 AM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
>>
>> What a mess.
>
> I can only agree...
It is experimental
>
>> Preparing to unpack .../libmagickwand-6.q16-2_8%3a6
control: found -1 4.0.2-1.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 2:52 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> control: reopen -1
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System
> wrote:
>> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
>> which was filed against
control: reopen -1
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the src:libgda5 package:
>
> #788729: [src:libgda5] Some sources are not included in your package
>
> It has been closed b
Le 27 janv. 2015 22:15, "Vincent Fourmond" a écrit :
>
> I've run the build on the MIPS portebox. It hangs on the first SVG
> to PNG conversion. Here is a full backtrace. The process is for now
> stopped on the porterbox; I think I can leave it for some hours more
> at least, if other informatio
control: reopen -1
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the chromium-browser package:
Hi,
I am sorry but it work on sse but not on i387 is the sign of huge
problem in the float
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 6:58 PM, DRC wrote:
> I can readily reproduce the failure with the supplied test case, but what
> I'm tripping on right now is understanding why a Huffman-encoded block can
> grow so much larger than the size of the source block (128 bytes.) While
> this test case is very
control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> package: imagemagick
> version: 8:6.8.9.9-3
> severity: serious
It is likely not in imagemagick, package does not fail before corrupt
png fix (not triggered by built) and source is indentical
previous build succe
this
> can be caused by the overlying application, even though the bug manifests in
> the underlying library.
>
>
>
> On 11/7/14 12:47 PM, roucaries bastien wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:36 PM, DRC
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I want exactly what I aske
, restart_interval = 0,
restart_in_rows = 0, write_JFIF_header = 1, JFIF_major_version = 1
'\001', JFIF_minor_version = 1 '\001',
density_unit = 1 '\001', X_density = 72, Y_density = 72,
write_Adobe_marker = 0, next_scanline = 2592, progressive_mode = 0,
max_h_samp_
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:26 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:57 PM, DRC wrote:
>> Happy to fix it, but I need to be able to reproduce it first, using only
>> libjpeg-turbo. Currently I cannot. I tried running
>
> Here a backtrace, do you want to get
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:57 PM, DRC wrote:
> Happy to fix it, but I need to be able to reproduce it first, using only
> libjpeg-turbo. Currently I cannot. I tried running
Here a backtrace, do you want to get some argument of the call function ?
#0 0x77067107 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entr
Le 7 nov. 2014 10:14, "Ondřej Surý" a écrit :
>
> Did anyone report that to the upstream? Since it affects multiple
> distributions that should have been the first thing to do...
I Sent a mail to upstream contact adress.
Bastien
>
> Cheers,
> Ondrej
>
> On Thu
More information could be found here
http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=26482&sid=81658bc2f51a8d9893279cd01e83783f
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>
> This is an automatically gene
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Source: imagemagick
> Version: 8:6.8.9.9-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
I beat you. I have just uploaded a version under mentors.
> imagemagick declares a build dependen
control: tags -1 + pending
control: clone -1 -2
control: reassign -2 dpkg
control: severity -2 wishlist
control: retitle dpkg-maint-helper should document that
dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir pathname are canonical path
Hi,
Pending for imagemagick. However could we document that
dpkg-maint
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> severity 701655 serious
> thanks
Dear moritz,
We are really near a imagemagick transition that will fix this bug.
Could you wait the transition ?
Bastien
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:46:50PM -0500, Michael Terry wrote:
>> Package: ima
control: tags -1 + pending
control: tags -1 + confirmed
control: tags -1 - unreproducible
Thanks for the bug report. I think I have found the problem
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:37 AM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
>> Package: imag
/cpuinfo ?
Thnak for testing
Bastien
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:37 AM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
>> Package: imagemagick-6.q16
>> Version: 8:6.8.9.6-1
>> Severity: grave
>> File: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/Image
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:37 AM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: imagemagick-6.q16
> Version: 8:6.8.9.6-1
> Severity: grave
> File: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ImageMagick-6.8.9/bin-Q16/import
>
> $ import /tmp/n.png
> Illegal instruction
Could you give:
- the architecture ?
- a stack trace ? Smell
Control: tag -1 + patch
Control: tag -1 + confirmés
Thanks i have done a patch
Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
>Package: libimage-magick-q16-perl
>Version: 8:6.8.5.6-3
>Severity: serious
>User: debian...@lists.debian.org
>Usertags: piuparts
>
>Hi,
>
>during a test with piuparts I noticed your packag
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2013-02-17 21:08, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> Thanks waiting under mentors to be uploaded
>
> * missing #DEBHELPER# token in both new maintainer scripts
> * use the real path in the changelog entry, not the placeho
control: tags -1 pending
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: autoconf-archive
> Version: 20111221-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> an upgrade test with piuparts revealed that your package installs files
> over
control: tags -1 pending
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:46 PM, David Wagner wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> Thanks for dealing with this bug!
>
> On 4 December 2012 13:12, roucaries bastien
> wrote:
>> Do you suffer dataloss ?
>
> I had the bibtex file in version control, s
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
> Would it be possible to get the patches noted to fix these flaws? Other
> distros would be interested in it as well (as would upstream, I
> imagine). Has this been reported upstream yet?
They have been fixed upstream. it is only a backport
tags 680928 + unrreproducible
tags 680928 + moreinfo
severity 680928 important
thanks
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Matt Cockayne wrote:
> Package: Imagemagick
> Version: 8:6.6.0.4-3+squeeze3
> Severity: critical
>
> Debian Squeeze 6.0.5
> Kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64
>
> Issue: When using the conv
tags 679063 + patch
tags 679063 + pending
thanks
> | Vorbereitung zum Ersetzen von libmagickcore5-extra:i386 8:6.7.7.2-1 (durch
> .../libmagickcore5-extra_8%3a6.7.7.9-1_i386.deb) ...
> | Ersatz für libmagickcore5-extra:i386 wird entpackt ...
> | dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von
> /var/cache/apt/
What is your arch ?
Bastien
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Source: cernlib
> Version: 20061220+dfsg3-1
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
> Test# 79 ( U501 ): completed successfully
>
> *
severity 66 serious
affects 66 src:imagemagick
block 634550 by 66
severity 634194 serious
block 634550 by 634194
affects 634194 src:imagemagick
severity 569251 serious
block 634550 by 569251
affects 569251 src:imagemagick
thanks
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Werner Mayer wrote:
> ...
>> Mehdi Dogguy or others who work on the platform kFreeBSD can you please
>> upload the file config.log because there we can see what really happened
>> during configure.
>
>
>
Package: imagemagick
Version: 8:6.6.0.4-2.2
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hppa
severity: serious
FTBS with:
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./www/Magick++/thumbnail-sample-plain.jpg
/build/buildd-imagemagick_6.6.0.4-2.2-hppa-WKfFIA/imagemagick-6.6.0.4/debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/imagemagic
2009/3/17 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer :
> El Tuesday 17 March 2009 15:40:25 Bastien ROUCARIES escribió:
>> Package: kde
>> Version: 5:48
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> I have upgraded this week my testing system (last update from five day
>> ago). Since this date accent are not correctly typed
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 02:26:18PM +0000, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> > # and to be frank I believe this bug is just plain invalid
>> > severity 511687
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> # and to be frank I believe this bug is just plain invalid
> severity 511687 normal
> thanks
No the bug is not really invalid it shoke insserver because
git-daemon-run is a binary file, it does not crash but report loundly
that it can not
severity 510987 grave
thanks
Restore grave severity because quota is not instalable. insserv is a
new init infrastructure I agree, but your package should not break.
Does not fix the problem.
host:/home/bastien# invoke-rc.d quota start
invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/quota not found
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Here is the fix in the proper location.
Thank you :-)
Will wait the fix :-)
> Kind regards
>
> T.
>
> --- librsvg-2.22.2.orig/rsvg-path.c
> +++ librsvg-2.22.2/rsvg-path.c
> @@ -114,8 +114,9 @@
>cause divide by zero and subsequent
Package:reaim
Version:0.8-3
Severity:critical
It is not possible to connect to msn with 0.8-3 and kopete.
Log are not useful and are:
[Sat Sep 10 17:49:52 2005] [CONN_NB] Connection [172.20.3.2:33084 ->
65.54.239.20:1863 via proxy] created [pending connection] (5 6)
[Sat Sep 10 17:49:52 2005] [CON
59 matches
Mail list logo
