Hello,
It seems that this issue was fixed for me in linux-image-6.1.0.16
(6.1.67-1) from stable-updates.
Thanks.
Rpnpif
packages linux-image-6.1.0-15-amd64 suggests:
pn debian-kernel-handbook
ii grub-efi-amd64 2.06-13+deb12u1
pn linux-doc-6.1
Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-15-amd64 is related to:
ii firmware-amd-graphics 20230210-5
pn firmware-atheros
pn firmware-bnx2
pn firmware-bnx2x
pn firmware-brcm80211
pn firmware-cavium
pn firmware-intel-sound
pn firmware-intelwimax
pn firmware-ipw2x00
pn firmware-ivtv
ii firmware-iwlwifi 20230210-5
pn firmware-libertas
ii firmware-linux-nonfree20230210-5
ii firmware-misc-nonfree 20230210-5
pn firmware-myricom
pn firmware-netxen
pn firmware-qlogic
ii firmware-realtek 20230210-5
pn firmware-samsung
pn firmware-siano
pn firmware-ti-connectivity
pn xen-hypervisor
-- no debconf information
--
Rpnpif
Le 05/07/2020 à 11:51, Stephen Kitt a écrit :
Hi,
On Sun, 05 Jul 2020 11:42:08 +0200, rpnpif wrote:
The command hubicfuse /mnt/hubic -o noauto_cache,sync_read
get the result :
hubicfuse: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.1.0.0: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or
Package: hubicfuse
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
The command hubicfuse /mnt/hubic -o noauto_cache,sync_read
get the result :
hubicfuse: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.1.0.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file
Andreas,
Thank you very much for the patch for Jessie.
Regards.
--
Alain Rpnpif
Package: gpa
Version: 0.9.5-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
In the Server menu, Send keys. A dialogue box is displaying which asks
"Are you sure you want to distribute this key?" If I click on the cross
(x) to close this box, so it is the same as to click on Ye
hat should lead to the removal of this package if not fixed.
Yes, it is not a severe violation but almost useless.
I think about Libreoffice that the packages have this function removed.
Nothing else.
Do what you want or what you can.
Regards.
--
Alain Rpnpif
Package: pdfsam
Version: 1.1.4-2
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
pdfsam should not search an update. This is the role of apt-get in Debian.
It is not conform to the policy of Debian and get a security issue in some case.
Logs in a terminal :
18:31:59,337 DEBUG UpdateManager Recherche de mise
Package: linux-image-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64
Version: linux-image-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
Booting on this linux-image-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 kernel makes always reboot
immediately after all auto fstab partitions mounted in the init p
/dev/cdrom1
logical name: /dev/scd1
logical name: /dev/sr1
capabilities: audio
configuration: status=nodisc
--
Alain Rpnpif
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ntly.)
I have also this issue.
> Until then I suggest to not bother anymore with that problem. If we do
> not get anymore replies during the next two weeks, I suggest to split up
> the Debian bug report.
>
> The first one of rpnpif, downgrade the severity to important and mark it
&
Package: brasero
Version: 2.30.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Brasero does not take account of the options such max speed and
simulating request.
Simulation seems to be too short in time. Speed is set to the maximum for
the hardware but not conformed to my reque
atures... As bad as it might be...
Hi,
So far I have not found other documents with this behavior.
--
Alain Rpnpif
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: openoffice.org-impress
Version: 1:3.2.1-7
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Open
http://media.eduscol.education.fr/file/seminaire_STI2D/56/7/STI2D_BacSTI2D_157567.odp
Export in PDF/A-1a.
The message "export to PDF" is displaying in status bar and OOo freezes wi
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:19:24AM -0400, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I have trouble understanding what you mean by "to upgrade
> initramfstools in mod edebootstrap".
>
> Could you give us the messages that appear on the fourth console? As
> Aurélien was explaining, if something is on-interactive w
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:40:48AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> This is something actually normal. What is not normal is that packages
> ask setup questions directly on the console, this is forbidden by
> policy. Do you have the name of such packages?
>
I think that it is not normal because
Now, this bugs is issued always once after the boot. If I restart by invoke-rc
cupsd restart, no issue occurred.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.3.17-4
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
/etc/init.d/fetchmail has
# Should-Start: $mail-transport-agent exim4
but fetchmail starts very early and failed to deliver mails because
The mail transport agent is not ready.
This issue could
Package: debian-installer
Severity: grave
debian-installer (netinstall) of 2010-08-19.
With normal mode of install (ncurses ?), it is impossible to answer to setup
questions (configure) seen in the background screen (Alt-F4). The install
freeze.
Only a kill action in busybox can do to continue.
19 matches
Mail list logo