On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 08:06:06AM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>
> So what's special about this build env compared to normal sbuild, where
> it builds just fine?
>
The build runs without networking, like the main buildds, and the Ubuntu
buildds.
The Policy requires builds to complete without de
Hmm.
I re-test things on my local builder before reporting them, so I've
definitely been able to reproduce this failure. My builder is much
more normal than jenkins: it uses apt to resolve packages, and things
like that.
If you don't have any ideas then I can run the build a few more times
and s
Maybe this is a duplicate of:
https://bugs.debian.org/800371
..depending on the solution they arrive at.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 04:31:15PM +0300, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote:
> Now that Bug#779324 is fixed, a simple rebuild would fix the problem.
Looks good, yep.
I have been reminded that there's a nasty C++ transition going on, so
these might be transient (i.e. fixed when the upstream libraries are
done transitioning).
Feel free to close as invalid, drop priority, or whatever!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:45:17PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Actually, my bad, the commit I referenced is already in the package in the
> form of a patch.
>
> In your https://paste.debian.net/286717/, I don’t see any mention of the
> patch, though…? Does your build environment not apply p
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:26:10PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> control: tags -1 + unreproducible
>
> Chris, was this an issue on your end? Or am I misinterpreting something?
>
The problem seems to have gone away. I was running local builds in
response to errors on the reproducible-builds
This is happening to other packages too, and I can't find the .moc files
I thought were bundled before; maybe it's just transition related and
will go away?
See e.g. qapt:
https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/qapt.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.de
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:03:04AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > t/undo.t ... ok
> > t/unexpected-cases.t ...
> > Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> > Failed 1/98 subtests
> thanks for the report, but I couldn't reproduce this, neith
9 matches
Mail list logo
