Processed: Re: Bug#1003865: GPG error: http://deb.debian.org/debian sid InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 648ACFD622F3D138 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster)

2022-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1003865 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" } [apt-cacher-ng] GPG error: http://deb.debian.org/debian sid InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 648ACFD622F3D138 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster) Severity set to 'i

Processed: Re: Bug#1003865: GPG error: http://deb.debian.org/debian sid InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 648ACFD622F3D138 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster)

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 apt-cacher-ng Bug #1003865 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" } [debian-archive-keyring] GPG error: http://deb.debian.org/debian sid InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 648ACFD622F3D138 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster) Bug r

Bug#1003865: GPG error: http://deb.debian.org/debian sid InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 648ACFD622F3D138 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster)

2022-01-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 02:47:56 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: I have seen at least one forum posting on the same error when searching for it so its likely more common https://www.nixcraft.com/t/signatures-were-invalid-badsig-648acfd622f3d138-debian-archive-automatic-signing-key-10-buster/4025 May