Processed: Re: Bug#1004863: Bootstrapping a Fedora produces a system with an empty package database

2022-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1004863 [dnf] Bootstrapping a Fedora produces a system with an empty package database Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1004863: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004863 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow.

Bug#1004863: Bootstrapping a Fedora produces a system with an empty package database

2022-02-11 Thread Holger Levsen
control: severity -1 important On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 06:05:24PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > thank you for packaging dnf in Debian! thank you for filing this bug report, Enrico! However I've downgraded it to important as eg Qubes 4.1 uses dnf on Debian to download upgrades for dom0, which is F

Bug#1004863: Bootstrapping a Fedora produces a system with an empty package database

2022-02-10 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 2/2/22 6:05 PM, Enrico Zini wrote: > I'm trying to use dnf to bootstrap rpm-based chroots, which seems to > work, but the rpm package database on the resulting distribution is > empty, as in, `rpm -qa` returns no output, and `rpm -q` on any package > complains that it is not installed. The act

Bug#1004863: Bootstrapping a Fedora produces a system with an empty package database

2022-02-02 Thread Enrico Zini
Package: dnf Version: 4.5.2-6 Severity: serious Hello, thank you for packaging dnf in Debian! I'm trying to use dnf to bootstrap rpm-based chroots, which seems to work, but the rpm package database on the resulting distribution is empty, as in, `rpm -qa` returns no output, and `rpm -q` on any pa