On 2022-12-30 01:48:56 +0100, Lorenzo wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Could you please clarify if this package should be maintained inside the
> Debian-Multimedia Team or outside? I.e. an uploader or a new maintainer?
Whatever the new maintainer prefers. The multimedia team always is happy
to welcome
Hi Sebastian,
Could you please clarify if this package should be maintained inside the
Debian-Multimedia Team or outside? I.e. an uploader or a new maintainer?
Regards,
Lorenzo
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 23:25:00 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Source: mplayer
> Version: 2:1.4+ds1-3
> Severity: seri
Am 21.10.2022 12:36, schrieb Tj:
I require mencoder specifically to handle some old legacy format
conversion where I found ffmpeg fails despite many attempts to work
around the issues with various command-line options.
Ever considered reporting these issues to the ffmpeg project?
- Fabian
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 20:09:59 +0100 Diederik de Haas
wrote:
On 16 Feb 2022 23:25:00 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Source: mplayer
> Version: 2:1.4+ds1-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bookworm
>
> I think we should not include mplayer in bookworm.
> mpv is a worthy replacement for mplayer
On 16 Feb 2022 23:25:00 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Source: mplayer
> Version: 2:1.4+ds1-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bookworm
>
> I think we should not include mplayer in bookworm.
> mpv is a worthy replacement for mplayer.
I do use mpv to play ~ all my video files, but I also wrote
Reimar Döffinger writes ("Re: Bug#1005899: mplayer: should not release with
bookworm"):
>
> These are definitely fixed in 1.5, and the fix for giflib should be not hard
> to cherry-pick for 1.4 if there is a need.
>
> > and #958865 (crash on theora) really ought
> On 28 Feb 2022, at 19:12, Ian Jackson wrote:
> It seems to me that at #1004579 (ffmpeg 5.0) and #939032 (giflib)
> would need to be addressed,
These are definitely fixed in 1.5, and the fix for giflib should be not hard to
cherry-pick for 1.4 if there is a need.
> and #958865 (crash on theo
On 2022-02-28 18:12:27, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This bug came to my attention as a user of mplayer, due to the testing
> autoremoval which is the consequence of an RC bug.
>
> I tried Sebastian Ramacher's suggested alternative of `mpv` and,
> speaking entirely personally, it would do OK for me as a r
This bug came to my attention as a user of mplayer, due to the testing
autoremoval which is the consequence of an RC bug.
I tried Sebastian Ramacher's suggested alternative of `mpv` and,
speaking entirely personally, it would do OK for me as a replacement
for mplayer. It seems to have many of the
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:45:59PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-02-17 19:13:08 +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >
> > > On 16 Feb 2022, at 23:25, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > >
> > > Let's stop pretending that mplayer is maintained.
> >
> > What is your criteria for "maintained"?
On 2022-02-17 19:13:08 +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>
> > On 16 Feb 2022, at 23:25, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >
> > Let's stop pretending that mplayer is maintained.
>
> What is your criteria for "maintained"? In Debian or upstream? Upstream
> issues are still addressed from time to time,
> On 16 Feb 2022, at 23:25, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
> Let's stop pretending that mplayer is maintained.
What is your criteria for "maintained"? In Debian or upstream? Upstream issues
are still addressed from time to time, there are still several people around
that can address issues, in
Source: mplayer
Version: 2:1.4+ds1-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
Let's stop pretending that mplayer is maintained. The upstream mailing
list infrastructure is gone and development has been minimal over the
last couple of months and years. So I think we s
13 matches
Mail list logo
