On Fri, 2022-06-10 at 05:09 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> There's a 101.0.1 on the way.
I assume you mean "being built for Debian"?
Anyway... thanks for taking care. :-)
Cheers,
Chris.
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 01:59:36PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Could someone then possibly rebuild this with Julian’s patch, ASAP?
>
> Over a week with a likely remote code exploit hole in the browser of
> any Debian (non-ESR) FF user, seems not so ideal,
There's a 101.0.1 on the
Could someone then possibly rebuild this with Julian’s patch, ASAP?
Over a week with a likely remote code exploit hole in the browser of
any Debian (non-ESR) FF user, seems not so ideal,
Thanks,
Chris.
reopen 1012275
tags 1012275 patch
Hi,
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 23:46:25 +0200 Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-06-04 at 14:42 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > Unfortunately, Firefox is not buildable due to depending on a
> > version of
> > Cargo not available in unstable.
>
>
On Sat, 2022-06-04 at 14:42 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Unfortunately, Firefox is not buildable due to depending on a version
> of
> Cargo not available in unstable.
Shouldn't that be reopened then?
I wouldn't be surprised if quite a number of people use the non ESR FF,
probably also DDs/DMs.
❦ 3 June 2022 20:48 +02, Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> close 1012275 101.0-1
Unfortunately, Firefox is not buildable due to depending on a version of
Cargo not available in unstable.
--
Don't diddle code to make it faster - find a better algorithm.
- The Elements of Programming Style
close 1012275 101.0-1
thanks
7 matches
Mail list logo
