Bug#1017132: opentracing-cpp: diff for NMU version 1.6.0-2.1

2022-08-30 Thread Luca Falavigna
Both ways are fine. If you upload -3 right now, NMU will be rejected because of the newer version, otherwise it'll reach the archive when time elapses. A maintainer upload would be better, though :-) -- Cheers, Luca

Bug#1017132: opentracing-cpp: diff for NMU version 1.6.0-2.1

2022-08-29 Thread Stephen Gelman
On Aug 29, 2022 at 6:52:06 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Il giorno lun 29 ago 2022 alle ore 07:34 Stephen Gelman > ha scritto: > > Would you be interested in creating a MR for your changes to salsa? If not > that’s fine, just let me know and I will pull in the changes myself. > > > Sure, here it

Bug#1017132: opentracing-cpp: diff for NMU version 1.6.0-2.1

2022-08-29 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il giorno lun 29 ago 2022 alle ore 07:34 Stephen Gelman ha scritto: > Would you be interested in creating a MR for your changes to salsa? If not > that’s fine, just let me know and I will pull in the changes myself. Sure, here it is:

Bug#1017132: opentracing-cpp: diff for NMU version 1.6.0-2.1

2022-08-28 Thread Stephen Gelman
On Aug 28, 2022 at 4:29:03 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Control: tags 1017132 + patch > Control: tags 1017132 + pending > > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for opentracing-cpp (versioned as 1.6.0-2.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it

Bug#1017132: opentracing-cpp: diff for NMU version 1.6.0-2.1

2022-08-28 Thread Luca Falavigna
Control: tags 1017132 + patch Control: tags 1017132 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for opentracing-cpp (versioned as 1.6.0-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards, Luca diff -Nru