Paul Gevers, Sep 19, 2022 at 21:52:
> Architecture: !armel !armhf
> is supported.
Awesome. I'll upload a new version with that fix then.
Thanks!
Hi Robin,
On 19-09-2022 21:17, Robin Jarry wrote:
Paul Gevers, Sep 19, 2022 at 21:13:
I consider tests marked flaky as not so useful. Obviously if you'll
look at it from time to time it's OK, but if no human is going to
inspect it, it's smarter to just skip those architectures. Doing the
latter
Paul Gevers, Sep 19, 2022 at 21:13:
> I consider tests marked flaky as not so useful. Obviously if you'll
> look at it from time to time it's OK, but if no human is going to
> inspect it, it's smarter to just skip those architectures. Doing the
> latter is also easier than the former as we have the
Hi Robin,
On 19-09-2022 10:41, Robin Jarry wrote:
Would it be acceptable to mark these tests as flaky only on armel and
armhf?
I consider tests marked flaky as not so useful. Obviously if you'll look
at it from time to time it's OK, but if no human is going to inspect it,
it's smarter to jus
Hi Paul,
sorry for the delay. I am getting to work on this issue.
I am not sure how to increase the timeouts for these tests.
Would it be acceptable to mark these tests as flaky only on armel and
armhf?
Source: python-bonsai
Version: 1.3.0+ds-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails on armel and armhf.
Because the unstable-to-testing migration software
6 matches
Mail list logo
