Bug#1063752: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1063752: custodian: Inappriate maintainer address

2024-03-08 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 11:24:15AM +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: > Source: custodian > Followup-For: Bug #1063752 > X-Debbugs-Cc: Debichem Team > Control: reassign 1063752 lists.debian.org > Control: affects 1063752 src:custodian > > Scott Kitterman reported that lists.alioth.debian.org is boun

Bug#1063752: custodian: Inappriate maintainer address

2024-02-13 Thread Nicholas Breen
Might this have been a one-time glitch? The list receives mail from the ftpmaster role address routinely, before and after the bug report: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debichem-devel/2024-February/author.html#16139 If there are no other reported incidents, I'd suggest closing the bug

Bug#1063752: custodian: Inappriate maintainer address

2024-02-13 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: custodian Followup-For: Bug #1063752 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debichem Team Control: reassign 1063752 lists.debian.org Control: affects 1063752 src:custodian Scott Kitterman reported that lists.alioth.debian.org is bouncing emails from debian official addresses (ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org in th

Bug#1063752: custodian: Inappriate maintainer address

2024-02-12 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: custodian Followup-For: Bug #1063752 I am confused by this bug report. The debichem Maintainer address used for custodian is the same as that used for any other debichem package. No problems were reported for the other packages.

Bug#1063752: custodian: Inappriate maintainer address

2024-02-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
Source: custodian Version: 2024.1.9-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 Policy 3.3 says that maintainer addresses must accept mail from Debian role accounts. This one, apparently, does not: From: debichem-devel-ow...@alioth-lists.debian.net To: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org Sen