On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 05:59:15AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:23:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > This has now been accepted, and the package uploaded to experimental.
> >
> > Please let me know how dumat feels about it :)
>
> Thanks. It reached dumat and the
Hi Andrea and Guido,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:23:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> This has now been accepted, and the package uploaded to experimental.
>
> Please let me know how dumat feels about it :)
Thanks. It reached dumat and the libvirt report entirely disappeared.
Green light for
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 05:17:28PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 09:38:46PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Looking forward to your update.
>
> MR here:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/-/merge_requests/232
>
> Please take a look.
This has now been
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 09:38:46PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 09:19:08PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > I disagree on the check being useless in general though. The
> > diversion should only be created when upgrading from a version of
> > libvirt that was not usr-merg
Hi Andrea,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 09:19:08PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > If you happen to enjoy merge requests originating from the Debian
> > Janitor, you may wrap all the added code like this:
> >
> > # begin-remove-after: released:trixie
> > #DELETE_PROTECTIVE_DIVERSION#
> > # end-remo
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 09:53:29AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Let me do the review part here given that you already did most of the
> work and given that a number of remarks have multiple options and I
> don't happen to know your preference.
Thanks!
> If you happen to enjoy merge requests orig
Hi Andrea,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:17:05AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> I read up a bit on the various problems and mitigations documented as
> part of DEP17 yesterday and figured that our changes would probably
> hit P1. I hoped that M7 might be enough to take care of that, but I
> trust y
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:17:05AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> +#BEGIN CREATE_PROTECTIVE_DIVERSION
> +create_protective_diversion() {
> +local usrfile="$1"
> +local firstver="$2"
> +
> +if [ "$2" != "--" ]; then
This should be "$3" for things to work. Same in the other snippet.
-
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 08:34:21AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> dumat already did its work. Your ping was still helpful. Please do not
> upload libvirt to unstable as is. I'll copy the relevant yaml report
> here for reference:
>
> libvirt-daemon-log:
> 10.6.0-2:
> issues:
> - files:
>
Hi Andrea,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 01:31:59AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> 10.6.0-2, which includes the changes, is now in experimental. Thanks
> again for taking care of the upload, in addition to reviewing and
> testing everything, Guido!
Thanks as well.
> Do we need to do anything to caus
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 02:29:52PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> The changes I've been working on are now available here:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/-/merge_requests/229
>
> Thank you all for your patience.
10.6.0-2, which includes the changes, is now in experimental.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 09:30:52PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 08:14:59AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 12:03:47AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > I have however realized that there is an obstacle to enacting the
> > > plan as outlined abo
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 08:14:59AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 12:03:47AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > I have however realized that there is an obstacle to enacting the
> > plan as outlined above: the restructuring involves introducing
> > several new binary packages
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 12:03:47AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 06:19:31PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > I spent some more time testing the restructuring today, and it seems
> > to behave well. There is still one known issue with transferring
> > conffiles betwe
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 06:19:31PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> I spent some more time testing the restructuring today, and it seems
> to behave well. There is still one known issue with transferring
> conffiles between packages under certain conditions, but I believe
> that I have a solid plan
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 06:19:31PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> So, here's my proposal: in two weeks' time, i.e. by September 25, I
> will upload a version of libvirt that includes both the restructuring
> and the usr-merge bits to experimental.
I obviously meant *August* 25 here O:-)
--
And
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 05:41:25PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 03:30:23PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Note that I have also uploaded 10.6.0-1 in the meantime, which is set
> > to migrate to testing tomorrow. I wonder how the two uploads will
> > interact with each o
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 03:30:23PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:46:36PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
[..snip..]
> Anyway, you've uploaded the changes now, so it's a done deal I guess.
> I'll just figure out how to deal with any potential fallout. Maybe
> it wil
18 matches
Mail list logo
