On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:36 PM Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> (Sorry, I thought I had sent this earlier.)
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 08:39:05 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:33 AM Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > If that's the case, then we should have transitional packages with
(Sorry, I thought I had sent this earlier.)
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 08:39:05 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:33 AM Simon McVittie wrote:
> > If that's the case, then we should have transitional packages with those
> > names that just depend on libproxy1v5 (>= 0.5.3). This
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:33 AM Simon McVittie wrote:
> If that's the case, then we should have transitional packages with those
> names that just depend on libproxy1v5 (>= 0.5.3). This serves two purposes:
What do you think about adding versioned Breaks/Replaces/Provides
instead? That seemed to
Source: libproxy
Version: 0.5.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks debian-edu-config dependencies
It looks as though the new libproxy1v5 has absorbed all of the
functionality of the older libproxy plugins:
- libproxy1-plugin-gsettings replaced by config-gnome internal to the library
-
4 matches
Mail list logo
