Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-05-26 11:20:09)
> On Sat, 25 May 2024 20:27:28 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 1071900
> >
> > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-05-25 20:13:12)
> > > Ahh, you are talking about *async-channel* v2.3.0. Please consider in
> > > future to mentio
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:02:23 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> > I will look into updating concurrent-queue to 2.5.0 then.
>
> Any news on updating concurrent-queue to 2.5.0?
>
> - Jonas
Just uploaded to exp along with async-io 2.3.3.
best,
werdahias
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 22:57:35 +0200 Matthias Geiger
wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:02:23 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard
wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I will look into updating concurrent-queue to 2.5.0 then.
> >
> > Any news on updating concurrent-queue to 2.5.0?
> >
>
> > - Jonas
>
> Just uploaded to exp alon
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-06-18 15:19:23)
> anything blocking an upload of async-process 2.3.0 to exp ?
That it doesn't exist?
Newest upstream release of async-process is v2.2.3.
Not sure why you need it - there is zero functional changes for for
non-android systems since v2.2.1 currently in
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-06-18 22:06:09)
> Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-06-18 15:19:23)
> > anything blocking an upload of async-process 2.3.0 to exp ?
>
> That it doesn't exist?
>
> Newest upstream release of async-process is v2.2.3.
>
> Not sure why you need it - there is zero functiona
On 18.06.24 22:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-06-18 22:06:09)
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-06-18 15:19:23)
anything blocking an upload of async-process 2.3.0 to exp ?
That it doesn't exist?
Newest upstream release of async-process is v2.2.3.
Not sure why you need
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-06-19 17:10:20)
> On 18.06.24 22:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-06-18 22:06:09)
> >> Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-06-18 15:19:23)
> >>> anything blocking an upload of async-process 2.3.0 to exp ?
[...]
> >> Not sure why you need it - th
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 20:04:26 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > >
> > I packaged async-signal; it's awaiting a NEW trip.
>
> Great!
>
async-signal migrated to testing; I'd appreciate it if you could test if
re-enabling async-signal fixes this bug.
best,
werdahias
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:45:07 +0200 Matthias Geiger
wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 20:36:11 +0200 Matthias Geiger
> wrote:
> > Source: rust-async-process
> > Version: 1.7.0-4
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: jbi...@debian.org, werdah...@riseup.net
> >
> >
> > I didn't have
On Wed, 15 May 2024 22:18:38 +0200 Matthias Geiger
wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:45:07 +0200 Matthias Geiger
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 20:36:11 +0200 Matthias Geiger
> > wrote:
> > > Source: rust-async-process
> > > Version: 1.7.0-4
> > > Severity: important
> > > Tags: ftbfs
> > > X-
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-05-25 17:29:45)
> On Wed, 15 May 2024 22:18:38 +0200 Matthias Geiger
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:45:07 +0200 Matthias Geiger
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 20:36:11 +0200 Matthias Geiger
> > > wrote:
> > > > Source: rust-async-process
> > > > Ve
Control: block -1 by 1071900
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-05-25 20:13:12)
> Ahh, you are talking about *async-channel* v2.3.0. Please consider in
> future to mention crate name, both in email subject and in content, to
> help disambiguate.
>
> I'll have a go at updating async-channel, and tigh
On Sat, 25 May 2024 20:27:28 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1071900
>
> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-05-25 20:13:12)
> > Ahh, you are talking about *async-channel* v2.3.0. Please consider in
> > future to mention crate name, both in email subject and in content, to
> > hel
Control: block -1 by 1071902
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-05-26 11:20:09)
> I will look into updating concurrent-queue to 2.5.0 then.
Please also see https://bugs.debian.org/1071902
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1071900
Bug #1069575 [src:rust-async-process] FTBFS in experimental
1069575 was not blocked by any bugs.
1069575 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1069575: 1071900
--
1069575: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069575
D
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1071902
Bug #1069575 [src:rust-async-process] FTBFS in experimental
1069575 was blocked by: 1071902 1071900
1069575 was not blocking any bugs.
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #1069575 to the same blocks
previously set
--
1069575: https:/
16 matches
Mail list logo