Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-06-10 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-05-26 11:20:09) > On Sat, 25 May 2024 20:27:28 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Control: block -1 by 1071900 > > > > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-05-25 20:13:12) > > > Ahh, you are talking about *async-channel* v2.3.0. Please consider in > > > future to mentio

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-06-11 Thread Matthias Geiger
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:02:23 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > I will look into updating concurrent-queue to 2.5.0 then. > > Any news on updating concurrent-queue to 2.5.0? > > - Jonas Just uploaded to exp along with async-io 2.3.3. best, werdahias

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-06-18 Thread Matthias Geiger
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 22:57:35 +0200 Matthias Geiger wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:02:23 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > > > > I will look into updating concurrent-queue to 2.5.0 then. > > > > Any news on updating concurrent-queue to 2.5.0? > > > > > - Jonas > > Just uploaded to exp alon

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-06-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-06-18 15:19:23) > anything blocking an upload of async-process 2.3.0 to exp ? That it doesn't exist? Newest upstream release of async-process is v2.2.3. Not sure why you need it - there is zero functional changes for for non-android systems since v2.2.1 currently in

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-06-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-06-18 22:06:09) > Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-06-18 15:19:23) > > anything blocking an upload of async-process 2.3.0 to exp ? > > That it doesn't exist? > > Newest upstream release of async-process is v2.2.3. > > Not sure why you need it - there is zero functiona

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-06-19 Thread Matthias Geiger
On 18.06.24 22:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-06-18 22:06:09) Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-06-18 15:19:23) anything blocking an upload of async-process 2.3.0 to exp ? That it doesn't exist? Newest upstream release of async-process is v2.2.3. Not sure why you need

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-06-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-06-19 17:10:20) > On 18.06.24 22:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-06-18 22:06:09) > >> Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-06-18 15:19:23) > >>> anything blocking an upload of async-process 2.3.0 to exp ? [...] > >> Not sure why you need it - th

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-06-24 Thread Matthias Geiger
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 20:04:26 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > > I packaged async-signal; it's awaiting a NEW trip. > > Great! > async-signal migrated to testing; I'd appreciate it if you could test if re-enabling async-signal fixes this bug. best, werdahias

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-05-15 Thread Matthias Geiger
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:45:07 +0200 Matthias Geiger wrote: > On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 20:36:11 +0200 Matthias Geiger > wrote: > > Source: rust-async-process > > Version: 1.7.0-4 > > Severity: important > > Tags: ftbfs > > X-Debbugs-Cc: jbi...@debian.org, werdah...@riseup.net > > > > > > I didn't have

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-05-25 Thread Matthias Geiger
On Wed, 15 May 2024 22:18:38 +0200 Matthias Geiger wrote: > On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:45:07 +0200 Matthias Geiger > wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 20:36:11 +0200 Matthias Geiger > > wrote: > > > Source: rust-async-process > > > Version: 1.7.0-4 > > > Severity: important > > > Tags: ftbfs > > > X-

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-05-25 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-05-25 17:29:45) > On Wed, 15 May 2024 22:18:38 +0200 Matthias Geiger > wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:45:07 +0200 Matthias Geiger > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 20:36:11 +0200 Matthias Geiger > > > wrote: > > > > Source: rust-async-process > > > > Ve

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-05-25 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Control: block -1 by 1071900 Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-05-25 20:13:12) > Ahh, you are talking about *async-channel* v2.3.0. Please consider in > future to mention crate name, both in email subject and in content, to > help disambiguate. > > I'll have a go at updating async-channel, and tigh

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-05-26 Thread Matthias Geiger
On Sat, 25 May 2024 20:27:28 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Control: block -1 by 1071900 > > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-05-25 20:13:12) > > Ahh, you are talking about *async-channel* v2.3.0. Please consider in > > future to mention crate name, both in email subject and in content, to > > hel

Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-05-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Control: block -1 by 1071902 Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-05-26 11:20:09) > I will look into updating concurrent-queue to 2.5.0 then. Please also see https://bugs.debian.org/1071902 - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.

Processed: Re: Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-05-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 1071900 Bug #1069575 [src:rust-async-process] FTBFS in experimental 1069575 was not blocked by any bugs. 1069575 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1069575: 1071900 -- 1069575: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069575 D

Processed: Re: Bug#1069575: FTBFS in experimental

2024-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 1071902 Bug #1069575 [src:rust-async-process] FTBFS in experimental 1069575 was blocked by: 1071902 1071900 1069575 was not blocking any bugs. Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #1069575 to the same blocks previously set -- 1069575: https:/