On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 06:12:50PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> I am not too fond about the suggested patch since it breaks atop on
> systems with 32bit time_t,
It does not: promoting the time_t to a long long on all architectures before
passing it as an argument to the format string is portable to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1069859 [atop] atop: Fix atop for 64-bit time_t on arm
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/Atoptool/atop/issues/306
Bug #1069859 [atop] atop: Fix atop for 64-bit time_t on arm
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://githu
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Atoptool/atop/issues/306
thanks
thanks for spotting and debugging this.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 02:16:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Although atop currently builds successfully on armhf and armel, it is broken
> at runtime b
Package: atop
Version: 2.10.0-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Hi Marc,
Although atop currently builds successfully on armhf and armel, it is broken
at runtime because it tries to use a time_t in a format string which now
4 matches
Mail list logo