Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:12:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230113: I think this bug can be closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2004 17:30:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 28 09:30:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tux.linux-nantes.fr.eu.org [195.25.81.226] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AltWa-0005pb-00; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:30:48 -0800
Received: by tux.linux-nantes.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1020)
        id 41B3D2F219; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:30:06 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:30:06 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AMaViS resets connection on MAIL FROM
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vincent CORREZE)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: amavis-ng
Version: 0.1.6.2-1
Severity: grave

On fresh install I configured AMaVis to work as an SMTP server (as
explained in /usr/share/doc/amavis-ng/README.Postfix).


When I connect this to postfix, I get a disconnect at the MAIL FROM:
command on SMTP.

/var/log/syslog says :
Jan 28 07:39:41 tux postfix/smtp[9283]: OE725F223: to <myadress>,
relay=localhost[127.0.0.1], while sending MAIL FROM)

/var/log/amavis-ng/amavis-ng.log says :
AMAVIS::MTA::SMTP: fork() successufl, child-s PID=18787

And that's all.

I get the same error when trying to do
$telnet localhost 10025.
HELO works fine ; MAIL FROM : connection lost.

I am using a Debian testing (sarge) with kernel 2.4.23-1-686 with libc6
2.3.2.ds1-10

The versions of dependence are :
logrotate 3.6.5-2
perl 5.8.2-2
perl-modules 5.8.2-2
libfile-mmagic-perl 1.20-1
libconfig-inifiles-perl 2.38-2
libmime-perl 5.411-2
libmime-base64-perl : perl 5.8.2-2
libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-3
libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0-1
libarchive-tar-perl 1.03-0.1
libarchive-zip-perl 1.05-1
suidmanager 0.52
perl-suid 5.8.2-2
nomarch 1.3-1
debconf 1.3.22

I have no idea how to resolve this.

Here are the relevant lines of my /etc/amavis-ng/amavis.conf :
mail-transfer-agent = SMTP
virus-scanner = CLAM
extractors=MAIL, GZIP, Zip, Tar, TNEF
notifiers = Sender, Recipients
x-header = true
x-header-tag = X-Scanned-By
x-header-line = AMaViS-ng at linux-nantes.fr.eu.org
unpack-dir = /tmp/
quarantine dir = /var/spool/amavis-ng/quarantine
problem dir = /var/spool/amavis-ng/problems
syslog = mail|info
syslog loglevel = 3
logfile = /var/log/amavis-ng/amavis-ng.log
logfile loglevel = 15
[Notify]
local domain = .*linux-nantes\.fr\.eu\.org
mail from = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
admin = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SMTP]
input address = localhost
input port = 10025

output address = localhost
output port = 10026

[CLAM]
clamscan = /usr/bin/clamscan

My master.cf goes exactly as in the doc file of Amavis for such a case.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 230113-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2005 20:12:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 22 12:12:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cobolt.net (mustang.cobolt.net) [213.180.160.231] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CsRcT-0000Wi-00; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:12:29 -0800
Received: from pd9513a1e.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.81.58.30] 
helo=turtle.linuxia.de)
        by mustang.cobolt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1CsRb0-00052N-00; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:10:58 +0100
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:12:17 +0100
From: Stefan Hornburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Emmanuel Lacour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#230113: I think this bug can be closed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: LinuXia Systems
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned-By: AMaViS-ng with CLAMD on mustang.cobolt.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:49:26 +0100
Emmanuel Lacour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Package: amavis-ng
> Version: 0.1.6.9-1
> Followup-For: Bug #230113
> 
> I checked this bugs. I cannot reproduce it on the bug amavis-ng version
> (1.6.2) beacause I wasn't able to make it work on unstable ;)
> 
> But I tried to reproduce it on the latest version without success (in
> the strace, Fabian Fagerholm seems to did a "MAIL FROM:<..." without
> space after ":" but in the initial report, this was made by postfix wich
> I believe doesn't violate rfcs in such way ;)
> 
> I also found that there is changes related to handling of this "MAIL
> FROM" address in (old) amavis-ng cvs:
> 
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/amavis/amavis-ng/AMAVIS/MTA/SMTP.pm?r1=1.23&r2=1.24
> 
> So I really think that if the initial author of this bug report doesn't
> tell us that he as still this bug, we should close it.

Ok, thanks for your help with this bug. Honestly, I didn't have a good clue
how to handle. Based on your analysis, I'll close this bug now.

Bye
        Racke

-- 
LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/
Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration
ICDEVGROUP => http://www.icdevgroup.org/
Interchange Development Team


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to