Hello,
I was looking for some RC bugs to close and found that one.
When I look to the debian/control file, I don't see any build-dependency
against libssl0.9.7, but a one against libssl-dev which is good.
Moreover, looking to the binary package in sid, I find that the
dependency is good:
Depen
Hi
Alexis Sukrieh schrieb:
> I was looking for some RC bugs to close and found that one.
>
> When I look to the debian/control file, I don't see any build-dependency
> against libssl0.9.7, but a one against libssl-dev which is good.
>
> Moreover, looking to the binary package in sid, I find that
* Christoph Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> > So I guess that bug can be closed by hand, can't it?
>
> I think you have to wait some more time. It looks like someone did a non
> maintainer binary only upload:
Well, ok, but I think NMU'ing the source package is welcome, isn't it?
--
Alexi
Hi Alexis,
Alexis Sukrieh schrieb:
> * Christoph Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
>
>>>So I guess that bug can be closed by hand, can't it?
>>
>>I think you have to wait some more time. It looks like someone did a non
>>maintainer binary only upload:
>
> Well, ok, but I think NMU'ing the sour
* Christoph Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> If I understand this correct the packages has only to be rebuild and no
> changes have to be make in the sources. What do you want to change in
> the sources for the NMU?
Well, I thought the source should have been sync with the binary. Forget
my m
Hi Alexis,
Alexis Sukrieh schrieb:
> * Christoph Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
>
>>If I understand this correct the packages has only to be rebuild and no
>>changes have to be make in the sources. What do you want to change in
>>the sources for the NMU?
>
> Well, I thought the source shoul
Hi Christoph,
* Christoph Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> > But I must be wrong, sorry for the noise.
>
> No. Thanks for your work. If you think a real NMU would make the case
> clearer and speed up the inclusion in testing, go ahead. The maintainer
> of cl-tclink is really not responsive.
* Alexis Sukrieh [Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:14:11 +0100]:
Hi,
> * Christoph Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> > > But I must be wrong, sorry for the noise.
> > No. Thanks for your work. If you think a real NMU would make the case
> > clearer and speed up the inclusion in testing, go ahead. The mai
8 matches
Mail list logo
