On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:27:01AM +0800, Anthony Fok wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:49:46AM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:03:33AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > seeing as xa is in the xa65 package probably the best way to resolve > > > this is to rename the binary in xa65 to xa65. David? > > > > Yes, I'll upload a package with this fix as soon as possible. > > It should be noted that upstream development of xa65 seems to have > > stopped completely, however the upstream has repeatedly turned down > > offers of adopting the software, so I'm considering either a > > reimplementation or a fork. > > Hello, > > Another solution is to get rid of xa+cv altogether. I doubt if anyone > still uses it. It was a temporarily solution for the days when Linux > i18n (esp. Chinese) framework wasn't mature enough. :-)
So it wasn't included in sarge, should we get rid of it from unstable, too? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
