Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:46:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Mono won't enter testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2004 22:47:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 01 15:47:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 205-200-74-130.static.mts.net (Zimmer) [205.200.74.130]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C2dsh-00058h-00; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:47:07 -0700
Received: from ddaniels by Zimmer with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1C2dsg-0000EH-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 17:47:06 -0500
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:47:06 -0500
From: Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mono won't enter testing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: mono
Severity: serious
Justification: ftbfs on arm
---------------------
There's no request to remove mono-mint against ftp.debian.org.
The "mono (1.0-4) unstable;" changelog entry says:
* Eduard Bloch
+ disabled mono-mint build for i386 and powerpc, upstream wish
According to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interpreters/mono-mint
there's still "1.0-3 [i386, powerpc]". Why did upstream only request
that a few arch's have mono-mint removed, and not the others (alpha,
arm, s390, sparc)?
--------------------
Also:
mono hasn't been tried on arm since 20040610-1450 (0.91-1).
http://buildd.debian.org/stats/arm-all.txt says:
interpreters/mono_1.0.1-1: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-elara
[optional:out-of-date]
Dependencies: libicu28-dev
Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 26 08:45:53
and:
devel/monodevelop_0.5-2: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-europa
[optional:uncompiled]
Dependencies: gtk-sharp-gapi
Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 09 18:23:07
[...]
web/mod-mono_1.0-1: Needs-Build [optional:uncompiled]
Previous state was Building until 2004 Aug 13 18:10:26
libicu28-dev doesn't exist on arm! Therefore there's a ftbfs on arm.
Perhaps there's another icu development package?
--------------------
Also:
mono-assemblies-arch (source mcs) is out of date on s390. mcs also
requires that s390 builds mono-jay.
--------------------
Also:
"easy mono mcs" from debian-release (Release Managers) is needed when
the packages are ready?
--------------------
Drew Daniels
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 283381-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 22:47:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 15:47:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DL7gL-0006Ig-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:47:01 -0700
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DL7gJ-0008HO-Sp; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:47:00 +0200
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:46:59 +0200
To: Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mono won't enter testing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:47:06PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Package: mono
> Severity: serious
> Justification: ftbfs on arm
>
> ---------------------
> There's no request to remove mono-mint against ftp.debian.org.
>
> The "mono (1.0-4) unstable;" changelog entry says:
> * Eduard Bloch
> + disabled mono-mint build for i386 and powerpc, upstream wish
>
> According to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interpreters/mono-mint
> there's still "1.0-3 [i386, powerpc]". Why did upstream only request
> that a few arch's have mono-mint removed, and not the others (alpha,
> arm, s390, sparc)?
> --------------------
mono-mint has been removed on all architectures on Fri, 18 Feb 2005
07:48:17 -0500, because the source packge stopped to build it
altogether.
This bug is therefore no longer relevant.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
