Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:28:54 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The bug didn't work?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2005 21:37:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 13:37:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from m26s25.vlinux.de [83.151.30.59] 
([NZTHS4LXQXlK8sCcXgzH/3l30pX6Qbo2])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CqI5e-0003qG-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:37:43 -0800
Received: from m-134-246.adsl.univie.ac.at ([131.130.134.246])
        by m26s25.vlinux.de with asmtp (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CqI6K-0005bX-Qg
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:38:44 +0000
Received: from ametzler by downhill.univie.ac.at with local (cert-ver=0) (Exim 
4.43)
        id 1CqI5M-0002DS-SQ
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:37:24 +0100
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:37:24 +0100
From: Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Dummy bug] Keep exim docs for 4.4x out of sarge until exim4 4.4x 
itself can propagate
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-GPG-Fingerprint: BCF7 1345 BE42 B5B8 1A57  EE09 1D33 9C65 8B8D 7663
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: eximdoc4
Severity: serious
Version: 4.40-1
Tags: sid

eximdoc4 4.4x must not go into sarge if exim 4.4x does not. This bug
will (should) be closed once exim4 is ready.
           cu andreas
--=20
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"
                                           http://downhill.aus.cc/

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB6t6UHTOcZYuNdmMRAtchAKChhnGMNuo4BduvBG1N2OtS00ewEQCeP/XJ
+0zyNESh3XioBzglOBnNWqk=
=OdUy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 290810-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2005 17:28:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 06 09:28:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 5301d.unt0.torres.l21.ma.zugschlus.de 
(torres.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de) [217.151.83.1] (Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CxqDQ-0004E2-00; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 09:28:57 -0800
Received: from lefler.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de ([192.168.130.38]:34738)
        by torres.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de with esmtps 
(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
        (Exim 4.44)
        id 1CxqDO-0004kP-RD; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:28:54 +0100
Received: from mh by lefler.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de with local (Exim 4.44)
        id 1CxqDO-0007KG-4Z; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:28:54 +0100
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:28:54 +0100
From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: The bug didn't work?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 06:33:12AM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote:
> Strange.  exim4doc moved into testing this morning, despite this bug.

Suckage. Closing the bug, while investigating while the bug didn't
hold eximdoc4 from sarge.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |  lose things."    Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to