Your message dated Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:44:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302258: All users unable to authenticate or logon to the
system via netatalk
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 22:11:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 30 14:11:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from galaxy.systems.pipex.net [62.241.162.31]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGlOz-0000oJ-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:11:05 -0800
Received: from saturn.jchome (81-178-223-230.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.223.230])
by galaxy.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49518E000261;
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:10:33 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Johan Raubal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: All users unable to authenticate or logon to the system via netatalk
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:10:36 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: netatalk
Version: 2.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Having initially beeing runing the stand-alone package of the v2.0
version of netatalk. in the last week it appeared in dist-upgrade.
Now, before upgrade the package was working flawlessly, since upgrade,
it will not authenticate any users! I have tried removeing the
package, removing all config files, runing a absolutly default config
(did not touch files in /etc/pam.d - but it looked ok) and still did
not work. No user can logon. OS X 10.3.x reports that the username
or password is incorrect, but never presents the user with a login
window. What does work is, that if I change to use *only*
uams_guest.so, some access can be achived. I have found no way
around this, looked very carefully at config, but no joy. uams_dhx.so
is also missing from the package, not sure that this is relevant or
not. There are no stored usermames or passwords in OS X that could be
interfering, multiple clients have the same issue - temporary
workaround with Samba in place...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages netatalk depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcupsys2-gnutls10 1.1.23-7 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) -
ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii libgssapi1-heimdal 0.6.3-8 Libraries for Heimdal Kerberos
ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libslp1 1.0.11a-2 OpenSLP libraries
ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-8 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302258-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 22:46:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 30 14:46:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 0x3ef3a55b.virnxx2.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk (xayide.jones.dk)
[62.243.165.91] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGlwp-0006ec-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:46:03 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xayide.jones.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28A91AB2F8;
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:45:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from xayide.jones.dk ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (xayide.jones.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with SMTP id 19501-10; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:45:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.102.136] (unknown [192.168.102.136])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by xayide.jones.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40351AB2F7;
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:45:33 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:44:54 +0200
From: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050329)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Johan Raubal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#302258: All users unable to authenticate or logon to the
system via netatalk
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at jones.dk
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 31-03-2005 00:10, Johan Raubal wrote:
> Having initially beeing runing the stand-alone package of the v2.0
> version of netatalk. in the last week it appeared in dist-upgrade.
> Now, before upgrade the package was working flawlessly, since upgrade,
> it will not authenticate any users!=20
> uams_dhx.so is also missing from the package,
Debian cannot officially build Netatalk with encryption support, which
is what you're missing.
I believe it is properly documented in README.Debian - but please take a
look, and file a wishlist bugreport if you believe it can somehow be
improved to avoid others getting into same trouble as you.
Sorry - seems from your bugreport that you've been through frustrated
time :-(
I dare close this bugreport. Please reopen if you believe I am wrong in
my assumptions. (do *not* reopen simply because you want netatalk to be
compiled with encryption support - a bugreport has already been filed)
Kind regards,
- Jonas
(not the official package maintainer of netatalk, just helping out...)
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er n=C3=A6r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCSyvmn7DbMsAkQLgRAsGjAJ0YRPWjzv8eVdjN02Tyou7pB2gPmACgmINL
gh4l6a1yFywrZPq46/uV/v0=3D
=3DFJi8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
