Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In woody, tetex-base already contained this as a symlink, so surely it
> was an RC issue all that time ago already?
Yes. I think the problem was not noticed before because if tetex-base is
unpacked before ivritex, this sentence of Policy applies:
On Florent's request, I'm currently building a fixed tetex-base
package with this fix in it. So that these sorts of things can be
fixed for release, please can we avoid tampering with the main
branches of the tetex-* CVS repositories; it seems silly to have a
separate branch just for this release
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:19:26PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > tetex-base contains /usr/share/doc/texmf/doc as a symlink.
>
> I suppose you mean /usr/share/texmf/doc.
>
> > In woody the package ivritex contained this as a directory.
Hi,
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tetex-base contains /usr/share/doc/texmf/doc as a symlink.
I suppose you mean /usr/share/texmf/doc.
> In woody the package ivritex contained this as a directory.
This is a bug that was partially fixed in ivritex 1.0-3 and finally
fixed in vers
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2c-7
Severity: serious
tetex-base contains /usr/share/doc/texmf/doc as a symlink.
In woody the package ivritex contained this as a directory.
This can cause problems on woody->sarge upgrades.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Relea
5 matches
Mail list logo
