Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 07:51:56AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 03:33:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:45:05AM +0100, Loic Minier wrote: > > > Anyway, your preferred option seems saner, and quite doable given the > > > limited amount of AP

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 03:33:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:45:05AM +0100, Loic Minier wrote: > > Anyway, your preferred option seems saner, and quite doable given the > > limited amount of API / ABI changes as listed by mdz. > > Other symbols removed since 2.1.7

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Will Newton
On Monday 21 November 2005 10:35, Steve Langasek wrote: > - restore ABI compatibility with libfreetype6 to freetype 2.1.10, in > cooperation with upstream > - restore ABI compatibility with libfreetype6 to freetype 2.1.10, without > upstream's cooperation :/ > - downgrade to a compatible versi

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:45:05AM +0100, Loic Minier wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > > This procedure should be avoided except in cases where the library is > > important enough to keep around for binary compatibility with software > > external to Debian. I don't have reaso

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Loic Minier
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > This procedure should be avoided except in cases where the library is > important enough to keep around for binary compatibility with software > external to Debian. I don't have reason to believe this is the case for > libfreetype; do you? I'm not su

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:54:50AM +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote: > without checking the exported symbols, I synced 2.1.10-1 into Ubuntu. > Feeling slightly guilty, I felt responsible to work on getting the > situation 'fixed'. To solve this problem, (I read that it'll be a long > way to freetype 2.

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Loic Minier
Hi, On Mon, Nov 21, 2005, Daniel Holbach wrote: > With the information that Matt revealed, I think it'd make sense to > rename the package to libfreetype6a (or whatever) and treat this like a > 'normal' transition, that other libraries do as well. I think you should reupload a fixed pack

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Daniel Holbach
Hello, without checking the exported symbols, I synced 2.1.10-1 into Ubuntu. Feeling slightly guilty, I felt responsible to work on getting the situation 'fixed'. To solve this problem, (I read that it'll be a long way to freetype 2.2), I'd like to come to an agreement here. With the information