Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 317082 dpkg-dev
Bug#317082: libc6-s390x: missing depends on lib64gcc1
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-s390x' to `dpkg-dev'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
reassign 317082 dpkg-dev
thanks
Summary:
The bug submitted in #317082 that requests adding Depends:
lib64gcc1 to libc6-s390x on s390. However the bug submitted in
#258647 that requests removing Depends: lib64gcc1 to libc6-sparc64
on sparc. Both bugs are conflicted because both
At Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:44:11 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
GOTO Masanori writes:
At Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:09:59 -0700,
Ryan Murray wrote:
libc6-s390x is missing a depends on lib64gcc1 that causes gcc to fail to
link
when -m64 is used on an s390 system.
I'm filling the bug here
At Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:09:59 -0700,
Ryan Murray wrote:
libc6-s390x is missing a depends on lib64gcc1 that causes gcc to fail to link
when -m64 is used on an s390 system.
I'm filling the bug here rather than on the gcc-VERSION packages because the
sparc64 packages have the dependency in
GOTO Masanori writes:
At Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:09:59 -0700,
Ryan Murray wrote:
libc6-s390x is missing a depends on lib64gcc1 that causes gcc to fail to
link
when -m64 is used on an s390 system.
I'm filling the bug here rather than on the gcc-VERSION packages because the
sparc64
Package: libc6-s390x
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge, etch, sid
libc6-s390x is missing a depends on lib64gcc1 that causes gcc to fail to link
when -m64 is used on an s390 system.
I'm filling the bug here rather than on the gcc-VERSION packages because the
sparc64 packages have the dependency in
6 matches
Mail list logo
