severity 317365 wishlist thanks Hi,
I am not sure I can follow what the object of this report is, and I certainly do not see why a serious priority is justified. What exactly is the potential for litigation here in policy? The bug number referenced offers no further explanations either. From what I can gather, the objection in some sense seems to be on the word "agreement". Not arguing the merits of that claim (personally, I would like to see some better justification for all this furor) -- the policy document does not include the word agreement, so surely whatever the problem is, if any, it does not warrant a serious bug on policy. Secondly, I am not sure that Debian technical policy is the proper mechanism to disseminate Legal advice to developers -- or even best practice. manoj -- Anybody who doesn't cut his speed at the sight of a police car is probably parked. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]