Bug#318590: versioned symbols patch

2005-09-16 Thread Domenico Andreoli
hi Daniel, here is my proposed patch to allow, at configure, time the production of shared library with versioned symbols. i used it to build curl 7.14.1-1 debian package now in experimental. i'd be very glad to see it applied to your source tree. feel free to modify any part of it but please

Bug#318590: versioned symbols patch

2005-09-16 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Domenico Andreoli wrote: here is my proposed patch to allow, at configure, time the production of shared library with versioned symbols. i used it to build curl 7.14.1-1 debian package now in experimental. Thanks! I like the general spirit, but I have a few remarks: 1

Bug#318590: Versioned symbols?

2005-09-12 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Domenico Andreoli wrote: Why would it need versioned symbols? The whole point of the different .so names would be so that _either one_ of the libs could be used, both would _never_ be used at the same time as it would be pointless. never? libA uses curl+openssl, libB

Bug#318590: Versioned symbols?

2005-09-11 Thread Daniel Stenberg
Hello Why would it need versioned symbols? The whole point of the different .so names would be so that _either one_ of the libs could be used, both would _never_ be used at the same time as it would be pointless. And of course, since the symbols aren't changed like that they can't be. --

Bug#318590: Versioned symbols?

2005-09-11 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:53:19PM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Hello Why would it need versioned symbols? The whole point of the different .so names would be so that _either one_ of the libs could be used, both would _never_ be used at the same time as it would be pointless. never? libA