El Miércoles, 3 de Agosto de 2005 23:19, GOTO Masanori escribió:
> Yes, I was confused. I understood the explanation from vorlon that
> (1) the previous version was compiled with old lkh - so the bug
> #318979 was happenned, (2) but unfortunatelly new lkh has another
> problem with xorg-x11, so it
* GOTO Masanori [Thu, 04 Aug 2005 06:19:13 +0900]:
Hello,
> Looking through this bug, the problem was introduced for compat_ioctl
> - the header used long type accidentally. I'll check it more.
Do you have an approximate idea when an upload could happen? Depending
on your timing, I'd like t
At Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:02:46 -0400,
Josh Metzler wrote:
> As far as I understand, #318979 caused xorg-x11 to FTBFS on sparc because it
> included which used __user but failed to include
> where __user was defined. This was apparently fixed in
> linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1. So, #318979
As far as I understand, #318979 caused xorg-x11 to FTBFS on sparc because it
included which used __user but failed to include
where __user was defined. This was apparently fixed in
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1. So, #318979 is no longer a problem.
What Adeodato is saying is that xorg-x
4 matches
Mail list logo
