Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:22:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 0.4.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2005 01:53:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 18:53:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E4qeC-00053a-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:53:49 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7G1rkus012675
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1E4osk-0001M5-1v
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:00:42 -0700
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:00:41 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: No matching function for ExtractTar call
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1023/Mon Aug 15 13:15:08 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: gnome-apt
Version: 0.4.7-1.2
Severity: serious

gnome-apt fails to build because there is no matching function for the
call of ExtractTar:

> if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/libg=
ksu1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include   `pkg-config --=
cflags libgksu1.2 libgksuui1.0` -DPREFIX=3D\"/usr\" -DSYSCONFDIR=3D\"/etc\"=
 -DDATADIR=3D\"/usr/share\" -DLIBDIR=3D\"/usr/lib\" -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=3D"\"GDe=
b\"" -DGNOMELOCALEDIR=3D\""/usr/share/locale"\"    -g -O2 -DG_DISABLE_CHECK=
S=3D1 -MT main.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/main.Tpo" \
>   -c -o main.o `test -f 'main.cc' || echo './'`main.cc; \
> then mv -f ".deps/main.Tpo" ".deps/main.Po"; \
> else rm -f ".deps/main.Tpo"; exit 1; \
> fi
> main.cc: In member function 'virtual std::string DebPackage::Filelist()':
> main.cc:231: error: no matching function for call to 'ExtractTar::Extract=
Tar(FileFd&, const long unsigned int&)'
> /usr/include/apt-pkg/extracttar.h:55: note: candidates are: ExtractTar::E=
xtractTar(FileFd&, long unsigned int, std::string)
> /usr/include/apt-pkg/extracttar.h:29: note:                 ExtractTar::E=
xtractTar(const ExtractTar&)

Appending "gzip" to the arguments to ExtractTar should fix this
problem.

--=20
Matt

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDASypfNdgYxVXvBARAoWCAJ48MuWuImdZFZVGPoMIw77EeJejuwCdEdd2
w3yXvNO6eUMwy3IXe2DYlm0=
=IkoL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289869-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 12:23:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 05:23:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from slider2.rack66.net (slider2.rack66.com) [212.3.252.150] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E65tk-0005FE-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 05:23:00 -0700
Received: by slider2.rack66.com (Postfix, from userid 1005)
        id 5D1CB73C7F; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:22:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:22:58 +0200
From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in 0.4.8-1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

I uploaded gnome-apt 0.4.8-1 today, which fixes this bug. Closing.


mvg,

Filip

-- 
"Sometimes it pays to stay in bed on Monday, rather than spending the rest of
 the week debugging Monday's code."
        -- Dan Salomon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to