I do not know, whether I have already respond to you...
Am 2005-09-18 14:14:59, schrieb Florian Weimer:
> * Michelle Konzack:
> > I can confirm this too
> > It does not affect Debian, but Mandrake and Redhat... :-)
>
> How have you determined this?
>
> Can you rule out that it's not reproducib
I summarized my "research" with:
> [T]his might not apply to debian at all.
Michelle Konzack chimed in with:
> It does not affect Debian, but Mandrake and Redhat... :-)
Florian Weimer asked:
> Can you rule out that it's not reproducible with some other charset?
I can't rule anything out. If I
* Michelle Konzack:
>> I tried both examples on
>> debian sid x86_64, mutt 1.5.10-1
>> debian sarge x86, mutt 1.5.9-2
>> All four combinations (two mailboxes, two debian systems)
>> ran normally, no crashes or any other unusual behavior.
>> So this might not apply to debian at all.
>
> I can con
Am 2005-08-26 16:28:38, schrieb Larry Doolittle:
> I read the full-disclosure post, and its reply.
> http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Full-Disclosure/2005-08/0600.html
> Two example mailboxes are given (one in each post),
> and it is suggested that the problem is triggered
> by a library ru
I read the full-disclosure post, and its reply.
http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Full-Disclosure/2005-08/0600.html
Two example mailboxes are given (one in each post),
and it is suggested that the problem is triggered
by a library runtime version mismatch.
I tried both examples on
debian s
5 matches
Mail list logo
