> It could not work in an acceptable way.
> Please read the huge past threads about this.
Could you provide a ML link, or perhaps record the points of the debate
into README.Debian or something similar? This isn't some discussion I
follow, but it just happened to bite me when upgrading udev so t
On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have a compatibility udev maybe ? Also you have to remember, that some people
It could not work in an acceptable way.
Please read the huge past threads about this.
> like or need to run two sets of kernels.
And I want a pony.
--
ciao,
Marco
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:27:09AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 29, Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In my case, I have installed a 2.6.12 kernel image, but not yet
> > rebooted. udev refuses to install because the RUNNING kernel is 2.6.11
> > not 2.6.12. preinst is a poor
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:08:17PM -0500, Ryan Underwood wrote:
>
> In my case, I have installed a 2.6.12 kernel image, but not yet
> rebooted. udev refuses to install because the RUNNING kernel is 2.6.11
> not 2.6.12. preinst is a poor place for this check, imho.
Indeed, this whole situation i
On Aug 29, Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my case, I have installed a 2.6.12 kernel image, but not yet
> rebooted. udev refuses to install because the RUNNING kernel is 2.6.11
> not 2.6.12. preinst is a poor place for this check, imho.
If you think you have a better idea, feel fr
In my case, I have installed a 2.6.12 kernel image, but not yet
rebooted. udev refuses to install because the RUNNING kernel is 2.6.11
not 2.6.12. preinst is a poor place for this check, imho.
--
Ryan Underwood, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
6 matches
Mail list logo
